AN ACCOUNT OF RESISTANCE
Intro. More than six decades on this account of a couple’s doomed efforts to sabotage the Nazi regime remains powerful testimony.
HANS FALLADA led the kind of life that is measured in shots. Shots of every kind. At the age of 17 Rudolf Ditzen, to give him his birth name, shot one of his closest friends dead in a bizarre suicide pact, staged to look like a duel. As a result he was committed to a psychiatric institution. This spared him the ordeal of being tried and punished for his offence, but on the downside it ushered in a life increasingly governed by drink, morphine, marital breakdown, mental illness and the Nazis.
In 1944, having already endured two separate stints in prison for petty offences committed in pursuit of his drug habit, Fallada fired a gun at his first wife in a drunken incident. The couple had recently divorced. He was briefly jailed again and spent most of the rest of his life in and out of hospitals until he died of heart failure in February 1947, aged 54. Remarkably, the last 30 months of Fallada’s life yielded some of his most powerful and enduring works, among them Jeder Stirbt Fur Sich Allein (Everyone Dies Alone), first published in 1947, but only now available in English under the title Alone in Berlin.
Despite his formidable demons, Fallada was astonishingly productive. He enjoyed literary acclaim, and a rare spell of mental stability, following the publication of his 1932 novel Little Man, What Now? , which was made into a Hollywood film. But the rise to power of Hitler triggered the first in a series of breakdowns that marked his slow, painful decline.

Alone In Berlin: Hans Fallada has emerged with a novel that remains powerful 60 years after the Resistance to sabotage the Nazi regime. Berlin, 1940, and the city is filled with fear. At the house on 55 Jablonski Strasse, its various occupants try to live under Nazi rule in their different ways.
Fallada’s relationship with the Nazis was complex. Having been branded an “undesirable author” in the early days of the regime, he was later favoured by Joseph Goebbels following his 1937 novel Wolf Among Wolves, for its negative portrayal of the Weimar republic. The following year he made plans to flee the country, aided by his British publisher, George Putnam, but lost his nerve at the crucial moment. Wary of being blacklisted again, or worse still confined to one of the Nazis’ notorious mental institutions, he was forced to bargain with the regime he despised in order to continue publishing.
Crazed killer, alcoholic, morphine addict and Nazi collaborator: Hans Fallada was always going to be a hard sell outside his native country. So it is to Penguin’s credit that it has taken the long overdue step of commissioning this English translation of his final work. It is a necessary step, too, for Fallada invokes an aspect of the Second World War that is in danger of being forgotten: the grinding horror of life in a totalitarian state.
..
ALONE IN BERLIN is the story of a couple, Otto and Anna Quangel, who wage a doomed campaign of resistance against the Nazis. Otto Quangel is a foreman at a furniture factory in Berlin, a man who demands nothing from society beyond a living wage and the freedom to live as he pleases.
At the start of the novel Fallada introduces us not just to the Quangels, but to everyone in their block of flats on Jablonski Strasse: the die-hard Nazi clan, the Jewish widow on the top floor, the petty thieves hanging around the entrance. Fallada expertly weaves the stories of this disparate cast of characters, creating a clever cross-section of a society under siege.
The Quangels are no blameless innocents: they have supported the Nazis in the desperate days of the early thirties, and for many years close their eyes to the atrocities just around the corner. Otto Quangel chooses not to dwell on the sudden disappearances of workers from his factory floor or the pervasive rumours about what happens in the concentration camps. But as the crimes of the state mount up, such silent complicity is unsustainable. The turning point comes in the shape of two events. First, they receive news that their son, Otto, has been killed on the front – on the same day Germany’s triumph over France is announced, prompting an outburst of celebration among their Nazi neighbours. A few days later, their Jewish neighbour, under provocation from the same family, throws herself to her death from her top-floor window.
..
NO LONGER able to ignore the regime’s disregard for human life, the Quangels begin a futile campaign of resistance that leads to their arrest, trial and death. Quangel’s method of subversion is almost pathetic in its lack of impact: every Sunday he writes a handful of postcards denouncing the Nazis and deposits them in stairwells. When he is arrested, he learns that all but 18 of his cards have been handed to the police unread: his two-year crusade has reached, at most, a handful of people. And he pays for it with his life.
There are no tricks or unexpected twists in Alone In Berlin. It reads like a whodunit in reverse, an account of a murderous state clenching its fist around another victim. Fallada’s style is straightforward, often crude (he is said to have written the novel in a “white heat” of 24 days, under failing health), with only the occasional descriptive flourish. The power – and the horror – of the novel is rooted not in the grotesque spectacle of the Holocaust, but in the commonplace brutality that underpinned it.
The Quangels’ situation is hopeless, but Fallada offers them redemption in their refusal to succumb to the Nazis’ dehumanising crusade. It is portrayed as an assertion of the primacy of human life, vindicated by the demise of the regime in the closing chapter. As Anna Quangel puts it, “The main thing … is that we never allow ourselves to be made into them, or start thinking as they do.”
– ALONE IN BERLIN, Hans Fallada [transl. Michael Hofmann], is published by Penguin Classics at £20.