Britain, Energy, Environment, Government, Politics, Society

Concern over energy firms refusing to pass on price cuts…

ENERGY BILLS

Intro: Millions of energy consumers on fixed deals will lose out

Millions of energy consumers with fixed price energy tariffs will not get a £50 reduction in utility bills as promised by David Cameron and George Osborne. A pledge was given this week in the Autumn Statement that electricity bills would be cut following the decision by the government to roll back some green levies.

The energy giant E.ON has announced that more than one million of its customers will get a reduction of only £12 – or 23p a week.

EDF is taking the same line with its one million fixed rate customers, who include many pensioners and families. Npower, SSE and Scottish Power may follow suit.

The Prime Minister, Chancellor George Osborne and Energy Secretary Ed Davey have made repeated pledges in their efforts to protect customers by rolling back environmental charges.

Mr Osborne said this week: ‘There’s going to be an average of £50 off people’s bills … We are absolutely insistent that this is going to be brought in.’

The smaller reduction of £12 covers the Government’s decision to switch funding of the Warm Homes Discount – a subsidy for poorer families – from energy bills to general taxation. The rest of the decrease was expected to come from changes to the Energy Companies’ Obligation Scheme, a levy applied to all bills to raise money for energy-saving measures for poorer households.

However, the element of the reduction is not being passed on to customers on fixed tariff deals by some companies.

In contrast, British Gas, the largest of the ‘big six’ suppliers, announced that all tariffs and payment methods will get a reduction of £53 from January 1.

A spokesperson for Consumer Futures, a campaign group, said: ‘The message has been that people were going to save £50 on their energy bill, but it seems a fair chunk of people will not get that. This sort of behaviour is not going to do anything to reassure customers … People feel confused and angry about their energy bills. This latest development just adds insult to injury.’

The spokesperson added: ‘I think in the current climate, bearing in mind how people are struggling, the right thing to do would be to apply the full reduction across the board. That is the expectation that the Government has created.’

Following the Autumn Statement, E.ON immediately announced a price rise of almost £60 a year for customers on standard tariffs. The changes will take effect from January 18.

The provider says that cutting the bills of fixed price customers by only £12 was justified because many of these people were already on relatively good price deals and tariffs.

EDF took a similar line and said its short-term fixed deal is some £90 a year cheaper than its new standard prices.

Related:

Standard
Britain, Government, Legal, Military, Society

Court Martial Review Board of a Royal Marine Sergeant found guilty of murder…

THE TENETS OF JUSTICE

In the High Court, yesterday, three judges lifted the anonymity of the Royal Marine Sergeant found guilty of murdering a seriously wounded Taliban prisoner – the first British serviceman to be found guilty of murder on the battlefield since the Second World War. A fundamental and central tenet of British justice is that justice should be seen to be done.

Defence counsel argued, with reason, that both he and his family could become targets for vengeful extremists. The judges dismissed this argument.

Related:

Yet, what of another trial currently taking place of two men accused of murdering Fusilier Lee Rigby? In this case, the jury has heard the statement from one of the accused, Michael Adebolajo, who has stated how he deliberately drove a motor vehicle into the soldier at 40mph, before attempting to decapitate him with a meat cleaver.

Adebolajo believed that Fusilier Rigby was a ‘fair target’ because, he said, a soldier is ‘someone who joins the army with a kind of understanding that your life is at risk.’ According to Adebolajo, this applies even if he is a ‘random individual’ who just happened to be walking down a street at the wrong time. However, the jury has decided in his case that Adebolajo is wrong that any soldier is deemed fair game for beheading just because they ‘know the risks’.

Primarily, the law needs to balance open justice with protecting the citizen. As long as there are those who feel it is perfectly acceptable to kill people for political or religious grounds and society is aware of such people, then the law really should protect potential targets. The Royal Marine Sergeant has been sentenced by the Court Martial Review Board to a life in prison, and he is to serve a minimum of ten years. He has also been dismissed from the service with disgrace. Any thought, however, of naming the other Royal Marines involved in the case of the murdered Taliban insurgent, who have subsequently been found not guilty, should be rejected outright as speedily as possible.

It is the view of this site that the Royal Marine Sergeant should not have been named.

Standard