Britain, Government, Policing

Policing formula for England and Wales under review

POLICING

MetCressidaDick

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick says she is facing a shortfall of £400million over the next few years if there is no change to the current police funding model.

GOVERNMENT MINISTERS are said to be considering a U-turn on police funding after the head of Scotland Yard has warned that the force is ‘stretched’ by terror attacks and violent crime.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd is under pressure to boost cash for the Metropolitan Police after Commissioner Cressida Dick said she was facing a shortfall of £400million over the next few years. She is also being pressed to scrap a controversial shake-up of a police funding formula following stark warnings that budget cuts in Britain’s biggest force would put London’s security at risk of a terror atrocity.

Met chiefs were braced to lose millions from their annual budget when the Home Office changes the method by which resources are allocated to forces across the country later this year. Before a previous shake-up was axed in 2015, Scotland Yard said it stood to lose £184million.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan has warned the city has lost ‘thousands of police staff’ since 2010, while the Commissioner has said she would ‘obviously’ be seeking extra resources.

She said: ‘We’re not having any fewer calls from the public, so we’re stretched. We do undoubtedly need a very capable police service in the future for all the reasons people can see. I’m sure we can become more efficient, however, we need the resources to do the job and I am talking to the Government and to the Mayor about that.’

Mr Khan said: ‘I’m pleased that the Government look likely to drop their plans to change the police funding formula. However, this alone is not enough to protect police numbers in London or to ensure we are able to deal with major counter-terrorism incidents and the rise in violent crime.

‘The Home Office has already made the Metropolitan Police find £600million of savings following cuts since 2010. Their plans to make the Met find a further £400million of savings on top of this over the next few years will have a big impact on policing in London.’

The Government faced criticism during the general election over the scale of police cuts since 2010, which led to some 20,000 fewer police officers on the streets south of the Border, following the terror attacks in Manchester and on London Bridge.

A spokesperson for the Home Office said: ‘The Government is undertaking a period of engagement with policing partners and independent experts on the police funding formula. The arrangements are outdated and do not reflect the demands of modern policing.’

And it can also be disclosed that around 2,000 extra Met police officers will be armed with 50,000-volt Tasers to tackle the threat of terrorism and knife crime.

The force will hand more frontline officers with stun guns following a surge in violence – bringing the number carrying the controversial weapons to more than 6,400.

SCOTLAND

HUNDREDS of police officers in Scotland are to be axed despite the growing terror threat as Scottish ministers removes one of its flagship pledges to maintain manpower.

Senior officials in Scotland have published a report spelling out their vision for the future development of Police Scotland over the next decade.

The Policing 2026 document was almost identical to a draft published in February but the final report was handed to Justice Secretary Michael Matheson after a consultation.

A move to axe up to 400 officers remains central to the plan despite the spate of terrorist attacks on Britain’s streets during the consultation – which had a response rate among police officers and civilian workers of only 2 per cent.

Mr Matheson insisted recruitment would not be slowed until there was evidence officers had been prised away from desk-based roles and sent to the frontline.

But Scottish Labour said this was ‘barely credible’ given the financial constraints the force faces as it tackles a looming deficit of nearly £200million.

Andrea MacDonald, chairman of the Scottish Police Federation, representing rank-and-file officers, said: ‘The world has changed since February after the terror attacks, but Policing 2026 hasn’t.

‘The concerns of our officers have not been taken into account and the report is full of shorthand for cutting officer numbers.

‘We are also very concerned about the money being spent on this report and on implementing it, with high-salary jobs being created to make it possible, at a time of huge financial constraints.’

The Policing 2026 report was drawn up with the help of consultancy firm Deloitte, which was paid nearly £700,000 of taxpayers’ money.

It is a blueprint for the next decade that looks at how police should respond to new threats such as cybercrime.

The core of the plan is that more civilian workers will be needed for these tasks rather than uniformed officers.

But it comes as some violent crime continue to rise, which critics say will require more officers on the beat. Police and ministers insist that beat policing will not suffer because of the move to shift more officers away from their desks back onto the streets to mitigate the decline on overall officer numbers.

The final strategy was signed off by Chief Constable Phil Gormley.

Police Scotland outlined the initial plans in February to cut officer numbers by up to 400 as part of a ten-year policing plan.

Mr Gormley said recruitment levels would begin to slow between 2018 and 2020, while more specialist civilian staff in areas such as cybercrime will be recruited. He also pledged better use of technology such as body-worn video cameras, more effective deployment and releasing officers from ‘back office’ and corporate roles.

Mr Matheson said the Policing 2026 programme was ‘ambitious and challenging’, with measures to counter the threat of cybercrime and a greater emphasis on addressing vulnerability and mental health issues.

He said: ‘The Chief Constable has assured me that operational policing capacity will be increased and I have made it clear that officer recruitment should not be slowed until clear independent evidence is provided that this increase has been delivered. Officer numbers will remain well above the number we inherited in 2007.’

His comments end the SNP’s commitment to keep officer numbers 1,000 above the level inherited in 2007.

Scottish Labour justice spokesman Claire Baker said: ‘Police Scotland must plug the black hole at the heart of its budget.

‘The reality is that many of the difficulties experienced by Police Scotland sit at the door of an SNP Government that tied itself to a policy of extra officers that it didn’t properly fund, with support staff being cut and officers back-filling roles.’

Tory MSP Margaret Mitchell said recorded crime figures – which are at a record low – were not an accurate measure of demand on the force. She asked: ‘What is the Cabinet Secretary doing to ensure more accurate recording of demands on police time and how can the level of police numbers required to cope with the demand be decided without this accurate data?’

Mr Matheson said the Policing 2026 strategy was designed to reflect the fact 80 per cent of police calls do not relate to a crime.

Seven priorities – except crime

SEVEN ‘priorities’ have been published for the next decade of policing – which failed to mention crime.

A diagram in the Policing 2026 report showed the priorities printed on blue circles, with ‘localism’ at the top.

The others are inclusion, prevention, response, collaborative working, accountability and adaptability.

Last October, police published an earlier list of future ‘priorities’ – with catching criminals ranked in only fourth place.

‘Localism’, ‘inclusion’ and ‘prevention’ all came above ‘improving the well-being of individuals and communities by tackling crime’ – now ostensibly under the heading ‘response’. The list has been replaced by a circle in an apparent bid to show all of the priorities are now equally weighted.

The ‘main purpose of policing’, according to the latest Policing 2026 document, is to ‘improve the safety and wellbeing of persons, localities and communities’.

More local policing is included in the list despite station front desks being closed and fears of a reduction in officer numbers.

The list of priorities follows earlier Scottish Government figures showing 40 per cent of Scots lack confidence in the ability of police to ‘catch criminals’.

Earlier this year, Chief Constable Phil Gormley said officers should be judged on their compassion when they respond to vulnerable people in trouble and needing help. He said an average of 84 people a day go missing and a ‘significant proportion’ of them have dementia, while about 260 calls a day concern problems other than allegations of crimes.

But the comments come at a time when sexual crime and some forms of violent crime are rising.

Mr Gormley added: ‘Another issue for us is a broader understanding of what the nature of policing is, because it is often reduced to crime-fighting and of course crime-fighting is what we must and will do.

‘But so much of what the public call the police about is not crime. We have 260 calls a day from people who are worried about other people and that’s what policing does.

‘I need to create a service with colleagues that understands those challenges.’

 

Standard
Britain, Government, Politics

Conservative Party drop key manifesto pledges from Queen’s Speech

BRITAIN: PARLIAMENT

Queen's Speech.

The Queen’s Speech is mainly taken up with Brexit measures in preparation of the UK leaving the European Union. A number of key Conservative Party manifesto commitments are missing from the speech.

The Queen announced 27 Bills and draft bills as she revealed the Government’s legislative agenda to Parliament.

The majority of the legislation planned for the next two years is dominated by Brexit measures, but there are also details on counter-terrorism plans, infrastructure projects and the economy.

After the Tories’ failure to win a majority at this month’s snap General Election, there are also notable absences from the Government’s plans.

BREXIT

Great Repeal Bill – A huge piece of planned legislation that aims to replicate all existing EU law into British law by the time of Britain’s departure from the EU. It will also revoke the 1972 European Communities Act, which makes Brussels legislation supreme in the UK.

Customs Bill – With Theresa May planning to take Britain out of the EU’s Customs Union, legislation is required to implement a new customs regime in order to continue the flow of goods across Britain’s borders.

Trade Bill – By leaving the Customs Union, Britain will be allowed to sign free trade deals with non-EU countries. This Bill aims to put in place the legal framework for the UK to sign any possible deals.

Immigration Bill – Both the Tories and Labour have said EU freedom of movement rules will end once Brexit is complete. This Bill will aim to implement a new immigration policy for EU nationals.

Fisheries Bill – Leaving the EU could see Britain quit the bloc’s Common Fisheries Policy. Legislation will be needed for the UK to manage its waters.

Agriculture Bill – The UK’s departure from the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy will similarly see new laws needed to manage farmland and the environment.

Nuclear Safeguards Bill – Another area in which new powers will be needed once Britain leaves the EU, with international safeguards required to be put in place once the UK quits the bloc’s Euratom organisation.

International Sanctions Bill – Britain currently places international sanctions on other countries through the European Council but will needs new legislation to take such decisions outside the EU.

TERRORISM AND DISASTERS

. A new Commission for Countering Extremism will be given the task of supporting the Government in “stamping out extremist ideology in all its forms”. There will also be a review of counter-terrorism strategy to make sure police and security services have “all the powers they need to protect our country”.

. In the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire, plans have been confirmed for a public inquiry into the tragedy. The Government also plans to introduce an independent public advocate to act for bereaved families after a disaster.

ECONOMY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

HS2 Phase 2 Bill – Legislation is planned to grant powers to build the second phase of the high speed rail line from Birmingham to Crewe as part of the £55.7bn project.

Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill – Motorway service stations and major petrol station chains will be required to install charging points for electric vehicles.

Space Industry Bill – Planned new powers will allow the licensing of new commercial space flights.

OTHERS

Courts Bill – A bid to make English and Welsh courts more efficient and accessible, including plans to ease the judicial process for victims of domestic abuse.

Civil Liability Bill – Plans to cut whiplash insurance claims will see proposals to settle claims without the support of medical evidence and a new fixed tariff for payments.

Armed Forces Bill – The Government hopes to attract more women to join the armed forces with proposals on part-time service, changes to maternity and paternity leave, and arrangements to ensure individuals are not deployed too far from home.

Data Protection Bill – Proposals to strengthen rights and hand people more control over their data, including a right to be forgotten.

WHAT’S MISSING?

. Donald Trump state visit – There is no mention of the US President’s state visit despite a reference to King Felipe and Queen Letizia of Spain’s visit in July.

. Grammar schools – The signature policy of the Prime Minister, which proved contentious with some of her own MPs, does not appear following the loss of the Tories’ majority.

. Social Care – The manifesto promises to reform social care funding, which arguably sank the Conservative’s General Election campaign, is missing along with other pre-election commitments such as the scrapping of universal free school lunches, means-testing of the winter fuel payment and an energy price cap.

. Fox-hunting – There is no commitment for a free vote on whether to repeal the ban on hunting with dogs, which appears to have been ditched.


COMMENT

The fragile conditionality of the new parliamentary order is clear for all to see as the Queen delivered her 2017 speech on the state opening of Parliament.

Conservative MPs, still shocked at the loss of their majority, managed to do their collective duty by attempting to rally behind Theresa May.

When a government has a majority, a Queen’s speech sets out the ways it seeks to change the country. This one, by contrast, contained only what the whips think they can get away with to stay in office. The list of bills was a radically emaciated version of the Conservative manifesto. Grammar schools dumped. The scrapping of the Serious Fraud Office abandoned. Foxes left to run free. The winter fuel allowance for pensioners has survived. Prison reform pointlessly scrapped. Other campaign pledges had been downgraded from certainties to possibilities, about which there will merely be consultation – on social care and the energy bill cap. Talk of an industrial strategy continues, but measures remain over the horizon. Counter-terrorism will be reviewed, as will mental health laws, though defence remains unexamined. The King of Spain will make a state visit, but of President Trump’s trip there was not a word.

The speech contained no clues about the putative deal with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party. Talks continue, but the mood on both sides is getting irritable. What must have seemed to Mrs May like a good idea on 9 June now looks increasingly vexed, as it deserves to. The Ulster party is driving a hard bargain of cash for votes that sends an embarrassing message to Tory modernisers. Mrs May should cut her losses and trash the plan. The DUP are seeking billions in extra cash for supporting the Conservatives on major parliamentary votes. The Government cannot be held to ransom.

On the two great issues of the moment Mrs May said little that was new. Brexit will dominate the legislative agenda for the coming 18 months, but the once-trumpeted repeal bills are now shrouded in extra layers of uncertainty. The government’s EU goals remain obscure, so the legislation will contain many unresolved clauses until they are clarified. Things are no better where austerity is concerned. Facing demands for extra spending on health, care, police and schools as well as pay, Philip Hammond may be eyeing a modest reset in his autumn budget. But the government may struggle to last that long. It revealed today that the UK budget deficit is set to expand not reduce this year.

The Queen’s speech reveals a government without a clear mandate, lacking a clear plan and led by a prime minister whose credibility is clearly on the line. It is frightened of taking sensible action on both Brexit and public spending. Its programme poses an unanswered question: What is the point of this? Unless Mrs May can supply a better answer than she offered today, it looks a doomed enterprise.

Standard
Google, Government, Technology, Terrorism

Google finally acts to block internet terrorists

GOOGLE

The Internet Search Giant Google is to start automatically searching for extremist material online. After months and years of campaigning by human rights groups and other lobbyists, it finally seems to be taking seriously the threat of terrorists on the web.

Through a process of algorithm adaptation Google will enhance the effectiveness of its computers to look for potentially dangerous content. This will then be reviewed to decide if it should be taken down.

Technology firms, including Google and its video streaming site YouTube, have been accused of foot-dragging and failing to remove extremist material quickly enough.

Kent Walker, Google’s senior vice-president, has now announced a plan to tackle the problem. He admits the search engine had previously not done enough.

“There should be no place for terrorist content on our services. While we and others have worked for years to remove content that violates our policies, the uncomfortable truth is that we, as an industry, must acknowledge that more needs to be done,” he said.

As part of the new effort, Google will use new technology to help identify extremist videos.

It is also extending its funding of experts who decide whether material should be taken down from the web.

The firm has pledged a “tougher stance” on videos that do not directly violate its rules but contain, for example, inflammatory religious or supremacist content.

In future, these will appear with a warning and adverts will not run with them, meaning those who post them online will not make money from such content.

And YouTube will re-direct potential Islamic State recruits who search for extremist material to anti-terror videos aimed at stopping them from being radicalised.

Mr Walker said: “Collectively these changes will make a difference. And we’ll keep working on the problem until we get the balance right.

“Extremists and terrorists seek to attack and erode not just our security but also our values – the very things that make our societies free. We must not let them. Together, we can build lasting solutions that address threats to our security. We are committed to playing our part.”

Labour MP Yvette Cooper, who was chairman of the home affairs select committee in the last Parliament, welcomed Google’s announcement.

She said: “The committee recommended that they should be more proactive in searching for – and taking down – extremist content.

“News that Google will now proactively scan content is therefore welcome, though there is still more to do.

“Still today there is illegal content easily accessible on YouTube – including terrorist propaganda. Google cannot delay in implementing these new rules.

“As with any other business, social media companies have a responsibility to make sure their platforms are safe. These steps are the first in a series which need to be taken to ensure they are fulfilling their important obligations.”

Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has called on fellow EU ministers to apply joint pressure on technology firms to do more to tackle the problem of extremism online.

At a meeting concluded in Luxembourg, Mr Johnson is hoping that all 28 foreign ministers will agree to establish an industry-led forum on preventing radicalisation via the internet.

In the wake of the Manchester bomb attack last month, links to handbooks imploring extremists to murder, and providing instructions for constructing home-made bombs, are still readily available.

 

Standard