Health, Psychology, Research, Science

Positive Psychology: Barriers to well-being

BARRIERS TO HAPPINESS AND WELLBEING

ON May 9, 2021, an entry was made on this site concerning ‘happiness’ and the factors that can affect it. You might like to refer back to it.

The article looked at various tried and tested pathways to happiness, such as the five components of Martin Seligman’s well-being theory: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning and accomplishment.

But is happiness that easy to attain? Surely if it were that simple, we’d all feel pretty upbeat all the time. In practice, there are several psychological obstacles which stand in the way of us achieving long-lasting happiness and contentment, and it’s worth knowing what these are so that we can try to overcome them. This entry will explore the five main barriers to well-being.

Barrier 1: the negativity bias

The negativity bias refers to our tendency to pay more attention and give more weight to negative emotions, experiences, and information than to positive ones. This means that you’re more likely to remember (and take seriously) an insult, a criticism or a piece of negative information or feedback than a compliment or a piece of positive information or feedback. From an evolutionary perspective this makes perfect sense since we would not have survived as a species had we not been finely attuned to notice the actual dangers and possible risks all around us. But now that there are far fewer threats in our lives (whatever the media says), this in-built negativity bias can get in the way of our well-being.

Studies also show that positive and negative information of the same importance do not hold equal weight in our minds. If we are given two pieces of equally important information about a stranger, one positive and one negative, they don’t balance each other out – we’re more likely to form a negative view of the person than a neutral one. Similarly, if we have had a good experience and bad experience close together, we will feel worse than neutral, even if the two experiences are of a similar importance. The evidence suggests that positive and negative emotions are not equal, or, in other words, negative emotions reduce our level of well-being more than positive emotions increase it. This helps to explain why it is important to experience positive emotions frequently.

Psychologist Roy Baumeister and colleagues summed up the impact of the negativity bias in five words: “bad is stronger than good.”

Barrier 2: duration neglect

It seems logical that the duration of an experience should influence how we feel about it and how we remember it. A two-week holiday in the sunshine on a glorious tropical island should feel twice as good as exactly the same holiday in the same location lasting for one week. Likewise, undergoing a negative experience such as a 20-minute dental procedure should feel twice as bad as a 10-minute procedure, assuming we feel the same intensity of discomfort throughout both.

So, it may surprise you to discover that when we evaluate our positive and negative experiences, their duration hardly matters at all, which psychologists call duration neglect. Factors which are considered more important are, 1) the intensity of the peak positive or negative emotion, and 2) how the experience ends. So, if we undergo a painful medical procedure which lasts 20 minutes, as long as the pain we experience at the end is less severe than our worst experience of pain during the procedure, we’ll actually remember it more favourably than the same procedure in which the worst pain is the same, but which is only half as long.

In practice this means that if we want to increase our well-being, and that of other people, we should deliberately look for ways to end experiences on a high note. This might just be a simple thing such as when leaving work at the end of the week, you wish colleagues a good weekend. Or, if you have to do something like a presentation, make sure you end it on a high, and practise a positive ending until it comes naturally.

Barrier 3: social comparison

We use the expression “keeping up with the Joneses” to refer to the comparison we make with others – such as our neighbours – to determine how well we’re doing in life. If we buy things to keep up with the Joneses, it means we’re not doing it out of necessity, but as a way of maintaining social status. So, even if our standard of living is acceptable from an absolute perspective, if it’s lower than our peer group our well-being will be diminished.

If we see people around us (family, friends and colleagues) buying more or better things than us, it makes us feel worse about our lives. Thus, how much we earn or buy in comparison to others has an impact on our well-being. That others may be up to their eyeballs in debt to acquire all these new goods barely registers. If they’ve got it, we feel that we’ve got to have it too. This is all made much worse by celebrity lifestyles which are splashed across the internet, TV and magazines, plus the advertising and brand endorsements which accompany them. The problem occurs because, unbeknownst to many of us caught up in the endless must-have-more cycle, buying more things in an effort to keep up with the Joneses will never make us feel happier. The reason? It’s what positive psychologists have dubbed the hedonic treadmill.

Barrier 4: the hedonic treadmill

The bad news – Think of the last big purchase you made, the last time you were promoted or given a pay rise. Remember how excited and happy it made you feel? Now think how long you stayed excited and happy. A few days? A week? In all likelihood, it wasn’t very long. We adapt, we get used to things, whether it’s the things we buy or other positive events and experiences in our lives. When that happens, we start taking them for granted, quickly reverting to our usual happiness baseline (also called the “set-point”). This is what happens when “the novelty wears off”.

In reality, the hedonic treadmill means that there’s little point in expecting shopping and material goods to raise your well-being permanently. They may give you a little boost of positive emotion in the short term, but the bad news is that it won’t last, and you’ll soon feel exactly as you did before. Worse still, you may feel driven to buy something else in order to make yourself feel better again. And so, it goes on. And on.

Sadly, this adaptation principle also applies to other pleasant experiences or circumstances, such as getting married. In research, the average person does not experience a lasting boost to their satisfaction after marriage. Instead, they experience a short-term increase in happiness, followed by a return to their baseline level beyond the early years.

The potential good news – On the other hand, this process of psychological adaptation also applies to unfavourable circumstances, which means that if bad things happen, we will feel worse in the short or medium term before eventually coming back up to our baseline or set-point level of happiness. However, research suggests that we adapt much more quickly to positive events and experiences than we do to negative ones.

There are two take-away messages from the hedonic treadmill story. The first is that you should expect the boost you get from positive experiences like shopping to wear off pretty quickly. The second is that over the longer term it’s worthwhile investigating other, more sustainable routes to well-being. And if you’re married or contemplating getting married, remember that it’s not a guaranteed pathway to permanent happiness – you’ll have to continually work at your relationship if you wish happiness to be your priority.

Barrier 5: lack of self-control

The fifth barrier to well-being is lack of self-control. Self-control (often called self-regulation) refers to our ability to control our impulses and channel our effort in a way that will allow us to reach particular goals. You’re not alone if you think you have low self-control – one study of the 24 character strengths of over 83,000 adults found that self-regulation scored lowest. But self-control is important; according to psychologists Mark Muraven and Roy Baumeister, lack of self-regulation is at the heart of many of the social and personal problems that we suffer in the modern, developed world.

Contrary to the popular view that happiness results from giving in to our natural desires, psychology studies show that higher well-being is actually linked to higher self-control. So, it makes perfect sense to find ways to increase your self-control. Luckily, self-control is bit like a muscle, the more you practise it, the stronger it gets. Developing self-control in one life domain can help to strengthen your self-control in other areas.

THINGS TO REMEMBER

. We naturally give negative emotions, experiences, and information more attention than positive ones.

. Negative and positive experiences of roughly the same importance do not cancel each other out – generally the negative experience will affect you more.

. Shakespeare was right – it’s true that all’s well that ends well! Try to ensure that negative events and experiences end on a high note.

. Comparing yourself upwards is likely to reduce your well-being. Comparing yourself downwards is likely to increase it.

. The novelty almost always wears off.

. Self-control is like a muscle: it improves with practice.

Standard
Arts, Health, Psychology

Resilience: Practise Gratitude

GRATITUDE

TAKING time to acknowledge what is good in life can make all the difference when adversity strikes. Studies show that gratitude lifts our spirits and floods our body with feelgood hormones and endorphins.

How you practise gratitude is up to you. You could end each day by reflecting on all the things that went well, or you could look for things that make you smile as you go about your day (such as an unexpected hug, embrace or bumping into an old friend). Some people find it useful to have a dedicated gratitude journal in which they write down three things they are grateful for every morning or evening. Gratitude journal’s are easily available and are an excellent resource for helping and improving mental health.

By training your mind to notice what’s right in life rather than what is wrong, you’ll have more emotional strength reserves to tap into to help you bounce back from the stresses and strains of life.

Standard
Government, Health, Medical, Scotland

‘Long Covid’: A Glasgow GP calls for community clinics

LONG COVID

A Glasgow GP and Conservative MSP for Glasgow has spoken about his concerns from those suffering with “long Covid”. As many as 90,000 Scots could be left suffering with the condition, a crippling condition which has left patients struggling to breathe, with chronic fatigue and aching joints.

Scottish Conservative MSP and GP Sandesh Gulhane is preparing to publish a paper on the condition after seeing patients in Glasgow. He believes the Government must begin work on a chain of clinics across Scotland to treat those left with health problems after coronavirus.

Dr Gulhane said he has seen first-hand how otherwise healthy people have been devastated by the diagnosis. He said the condition has left many people unable to do essential tasks.

According to Healthcare Improvement Scotland, most people struck down by Covid should be symptom free within 12 weeks. Anyone with new or persisting symptoms in that time frame is likely to have “long Covid”, which can have a “detrimental impact on their quality of life”.

Symptoms can include “shortness of breath, fatigue, heart, lung, kidney, neurological and musculoskeletal” problems.

The Scottish Government has warned that these are “not limited to people who were seriously unwell or hospitalised when they first caught the virus” – with a fluctuation in symptoms likely over time.

After looking at official data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), Dr Gulhane believes as many as 90,000 people living in Scotland could suffer from the condition.

He has welcomed the Covid in Scotland Study (CISS), which is looking to bring more understanding of the impact of prolonged symptoms.

Dr Gulhane has also issued a plea to the Government to “get to grips” with long Covid quicker. He says this must include a “network of community clinics” along with specialist centres.

The CISS is led by the University of Glasgow with Public Health Scotland and the NHS, and is funded by the Scottish Government. Every adult who has tested positive will be invited to take part – with researchers hoping to see how many continue to be unwell after having the virus.

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Our NHS is already delivering care tailored to the individual needs of people experiencing long-term effects.

“This is still a relatively new illness, and it is important that we continue to improve our understanding of its effects on people, in order to ensure they receive the best possible care.

“The Scottish Government has committed around £2.5million to fund nine projects to improve our understanding… and help with developing clinical interventions to support recovery.”

Standard