Britain, Government, National Security, Society, Terrorism

Right-wing extremists to be monitored by MI5

BRITAIN

BRITISH intelligence is to take responsibility for tackling the terror threat from Right-wing extremists as part of a major overhaul.

Amid increasing concern that white supremacists are trying to stir up a racial and religious war on UK streets, MI5 will for the first time take the lead in combating the problem.

In the past, the police have been directly tasked with monitoring far-Right groups. It means the ideology will sit in the same security service portfolio as Islamist terrorism.

Extreme Right-wing activity will be designated as posing a key threat to national security.

Four far-Right terror plots have been thwarted in Britain since 2017, compared to 13 involving Muslim fanatics. The authorities have expressed fears about a resurgence from neo-Nazi groups, especially since the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox by white supremacist Thomas Mair in 2016.

In February, Darren Osborne was jailed for life for attacking Muslim worshippers with a van in Finsbury Park, North London, in June 2017.

And, in the past week, a man has been charged with sending 13 pipe bombs to opponents of President Donald Trump. A second man was arrested for murdering 11 Jewish worshippers during an anti-Semitic gun attack at a synagogue in the US city of Pittsburgh.

In the UK, there are about 100 live investigations into extreme Right-wing individuals and groups. Although the threat is not assessed to be of the same magnitude as that posed by Islamic State or Al-Qaeda, security chiefs are aware that extreme Right-wing organisations are attempting to provoke violence and by sowing discord.

MI5’s techniques and greater powers of surveillance will allow intelligence agents to discover more about threats posed by the extreme right than the police are able to.

It will formally take responsibility for identifying suspects, assessing their danger, analyse networks of extremists and rank threats.

Police will stay in charge when it comes to launching an operation to disrupt a plot or by making arrests.

Last month, Home Office figures revealed the number of white terror suspects being apprehended or arrested was higher than those who were Asian for the first time since the July 7 bombings in 2005. In the year to June, 133 were white and 129 were Asian ethnic background.

Neil Basu, Britain’s top counter-terrorism police officer, told the home affairs select committee that the extreme Right-wing was growing across Europe. He said: “There is no doubt that crosses the border into the UK and there have been attempts by groups here to coordinate with European partners as well.”

Standard
Britain, Defence, Government, National Security, Terrorism

Security Review: Terror threat to UK to get worse

BRITAIN

A SECURITY review warns that Britain could face a greater threat from Islamist terrorism over the next two years.

Intelligence experts fear battle-hardened jihadis in Syria are dispersing to set up cells elsewhere from which to plot attacks on the West.

There are also concerns that die-hard fanatics could try to come back to Britain to carry out massacres.

These factors, on top of concerns that youngsters at home are being easily radicalised on the internet, point to a heightened terror threat.

The assessment comes after MI5 chief Andrew Parker recently warned that the terror threat was already the worst he had ever seen in his 34-year career.

A security shake-up detailed in the National Security Capability Review, states: ‘We expect the threat from Islamist terrorism to remain at its current heightened level for at least two years and it might increase further.’

The review comes in the wake of five terror attacks on British soil last year and this month’s nerve-agent attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, in Salisbury.

In other details from the review, it can be disclosed that:

. The UK will introduce a ‘fusion doctrine’ to use military, financial, cultural and diplomatic clout to quash threats;

. ‘Unprecedented’ levels of intelligence were shared with allies after Salisbury to make the case for action against Russia;

. Russia, Iran and North Korea are identified as the key state-based threats;

. So-called ‘soft power’ such as the BBC’s World Service and social media will be used to tackle misinformation.

The review outlines the threats facing the UK and how the Government plans to deal with them.

In it, Theresa May states: ‘Every part of our Government and every one of our agencies has its part to play. As long as we defend our interests and stand up for our values, there will continue to be those who seek to undermine or attack us. But these people should be in no doubt that we will use every capability at our disposal to defeat them.

‘Over the past year we have witnessed appalling terrorist attacks in London and Manchester. But also a brazen and reckless act of aggression on the streets of Salisbury: Attempted murder using an illegal chemical weapon, amounting to an unlawful use of force against the UK.’

She said national security depended on not only the police, security services and the Armed Forces, but ‘on our ability to mobilise… the full range of our capabilities in concert’.

The nerve-agent attack in Salisbury shows just how important it was to counter propaganda from Russia. The Kremlin had put out more than 20 stories to confuse the picture.

On top of this, up to 2,800 Russian bots – computer programmes that generate posts on social media – are thought to have tried to sow confusion after the poison attack by spreading deliberately fake information. Officials have feared for months that IS jihadists defeated in Iraq and Syria could morph into a new terror group.

But the danger from Islamist extremists moving into other regions seems likely to increase the threat to British citizens. There are, for example, cells in Yemen, Nigeria, Somalia, as well as those remnants that remain in Syria and Iraq. There is no doubt that they will seek to project out.

The biggest shift in the terrorist threat comes from those who have been radicalised in their own communities and through their interactions in cyber space.


. Russia can take fight to space

Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier, Head of the RAF, warns that Russia could defy international rules by attacking in space.

THE UK must be ready to confront Russia in space as technology opens a new frontier, the head of the RAF has said.

In the wake of the Salisbury nerve-agent attack, Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier warned that Moscow could defy rules to attack in space.

He said enemy states were developing space weapons capable of destroying satellites and jamming GPS signals.

The Chief of the Air Staff said the RAF needed to be able to combat such threats. At the Royal Aeronautical Society in London, he said: “We have potential adversaries like Russia who are disregarding the rules-based international system and exploiting environments in whatever way they feel they can to their advantage. I don’t foresee a war in space, but I can see us being contested for use of space and for people trying to deny some of our specific capabilities.

“We already see that to a significant degree and we need to be prepared to deal with that threat.”

His warning of intensifying threats from Russia comes ahead of the publication of a defence review in the summer.

Weapons could affect the ability of aircraft to operate, cripple satnavs and shut down maps on mobile phones.

Consumers could also be stopped from using cashpoints and online banking because such activities rely on satellites and time signals.

Sir Stephen said: “We could look at it and say, ‘Yes that is the theory, but they wouldn’t do it, would they?’ Well they would never launch a nerve-agent on a city in the United Kingdom, would they? But they did. So, we need to be ready for those situations.” Pentagon experts believe Russia and China are developing lasers and missiles that could take out satellites in low-earth orbit, according to reports.

Sir Stephen also hit out at Russia for its use of a military grade nerve agent, as well as the “criminal activities of the Russian state in cyberspace”.

He said: “The post-war consensus that has provided the basis for the rules-based international order is being challenged and undermined.

“We must respond, collectively with our NATO and other partners, to counter hostile acts by Russia against our countries, our interests and our values.”

It comes as Western capitals brace for Kremlin reprisals after the list of British allies kicking out Russian spies over the Salisbury attack grew to 27.

Ireland, Belgium, Macedonia and Moldova have joined the list while NATO said it would cut the Russian delegation at its headquarters by ten.

Moscow has threatened a “tough response” to the expulsions.

. See also Britain’s Military and the 2015 Defence Review…

Standard
Google, Government, Technology, Terrorism

Google finally acts to block internet terrorists

GOOGLE

The Internet Search Giant Google is to start automatically searching for extremist material online. After months and years of campaigning by human rights groups and other lobbyists, it finally seems to be taking seriously the threat of terrorists on the web.

Through a process of algorithm adaptation Google will enhance the effectiveness of its computers to look for potentially dangerous content. This will then be reviewed to decide if it should be taken down.

Technology firms, including Google and its video streaming site YouTube, have been accused of foot-dragging and failing to remove extremist material quickly enough.

Kent Walker, Google’s senior vice-president, has now announced a plan to tackle the problem. He admits the search engine had previously not done enough.

“There should be no place for terrorist content on our services. While we and others have worked for years to remove content that violates our policies, the uncomfortable truth is that we, as an industry, must acknowledge that more needs to be done,” he said.

As part of the new effort, Google will use new technology to help identify extremist videos.

It is also extending its funding of experts who decide whether material should be taken down from the web.

The firm has pledged a “tougher stance” on videos that do not directly violate its rules but contain, for example, inflammatory religious or supremacist content.

In future, these will appear with a warning and adverts will not run with them, meaning those who post them online will not make money from such content.

And YouTube will re-direct potential Islamic State recruits who search for extremist material to anti-terror videos aimed at stopping them from being radicalised.

Mr Walker said: “Collectively these changes will make a difference. And we’ll keep working on the problem until we get the balance right.

“Extremists and terrorists seek to attack and erode not just our security but also our values – the very things that make our societies free. We must not let them. Together, we can build lasting solutions that address threats to our security. We are committed to playing our part.”

Labour MP Yvette Cooper, who was chairman of the home affairs select committee in the last Parliament, welcomed Google’s announcement.

She said: “The committee recommended that they should be more proactive in searching for – and taking down – extremist content.

“News that Google will now proactively scan content is therefore welcome, though there is still more to do.

“Still today there is illegal content easily accessible on YouTube – including terrorist propaganda. Google cannot delay in implementing these new rules.

“As with any other business, social media companies have a responsibility to make sure their platforms are safe. These steps are the first in a series which need to be taken to ensure they are fulfilling their important obligations.”

Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has called on fellow EU ministers to apply joint pressure on technology firms to do more to tackle the problem of extremism online.

At a meeting concluded in Luxembourg, Mr Johnson is hoping that all 28 foreign ministers will agree to establish an industry-led forum on preventing radicalisation via the internet.

In the wake of the Manchester bomb attack last month, links to handbooks imploring extremists to murder, and providing instructions for constructing home-made bombs, are still readily available.

 

Standard