Britain, Government, NBC Warfare, Russia, Society, United Nations, United States

Britain expels 23 Russian spies in biggest reprisal since Cold War

BRITAIN

MOSCOW has vowed revenge against Britain after Theresa May ordered the biggest purge of Russian spies since the Cold War.

In a barely-veiled threat, the Kremlin said its response to what it described as a “hostile” package of measures announced by the Prime Minister “would not be long in coming”.

The United States has vowed to stand shoulder to shoulder with the UK in its response to Russian involvement in the Salisbury chemical attack.

Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, said: “If we don’t take immediate concrete measures to address this now, Salisbury will not be the last place we see chemical weapons used. They could be used here in New York, or in cities of any country that sits on this council. This is a defining moment.”

Britain’s deputy UN ambassador Jonathan Allen accused Russia of deploying “a weapon so horrific it is banned from use in war”.

In a forceful statement to MPs, Mrs May said the Kremlin would be made to pay for its role in the Salisbury attack.

She confirmed that Moscow had failed to meet a deadline to explain how the Russian-produced military nerve agent Novichok came to be used in the attempt to murder former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.

She said Russia had “treated the use of a military-grade nerve agent in Europe with sarcasm, contempt and defiance”. She added: “There is no alternative conclusion other than that the Russian state was culpable for the attempted murder.”

The PM outlined a series of tough sanctions, including the expulsion of 23 suspected spies posing as diplomats as well as the threat of financial sanctions against Russian oligarchs and cronies of President Putin with assets in London.

The expulsion of diplomats is the biggest since 1985 and is designed to “fundamentally degrade Russian intelligence capability in the UK for years to come”.

High-level diplomatic relations will be scrapped, with an invitation to Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov to visit the UK revoked.

Mrs May also suggested that covert reprisals would be undertaken – in an apparent hint at cyber attacks aimed at damaging the Russian state’s propaganda machine.

British sources said Mrs May was willing to unveil even tougher sanctions if the Kremlin hit back.

A senior government official said: “We are responding in a way that is robust, it gives us the ability to respond if the Russians escalate but it is also in line with the rule of law, all of which is in stark contrast to the way the Russian state has behaved both in this instance and wider areas of policy. Further options remain on the table.” The official said that if the measures fail to produce a change in behaviour from the Kremlin… “we will look again.”

But Moscow has warned that the UK would face reprisals for the “groundless anti-Russian campaign.” The Prime Minister told MPs that the UK “does not stand alone in confronting Russian aggression”, with messages of support already received from key allies such as the US, France, Germany and NATO.

She added: “This was not just an act of attempted murder in Salisbury, nor just an act against the UK. It is an affront to the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons, and it is an affront to the rules-based system on which we and our international partners depend.”

Veteran Conservative MP Kenneth Clarke said the “bizarre and dreadful” use of a nerve agent appeared to be “a deliberate choice by the Russian government to put their signature on a particular killing so that other defectors are left in no doubt that it is the Russian government”.

Mrs May confirmed that Prince William and Prince Harry will join ministers in boycotting this summers football World Cup in Russia, but Government sources say that, although she called on the FA “to consider their position”, she will not order the England team to withdraw as there is no sign that other countries would join a walkout.

Labour MP Stephen Kinnock said: “The Russia World Cup risks vindicating the Putin regime. We should look at postponing the World Cup and hosting it in another country.”

Revised Foreign Office travel advice for Russia has warned of an upsurge in “anti-British sentiment or harassment” in a country plagued by violent football hooliganism. A Whitehall source said the estimated 2,000 fans who have bought tickets were likely to be issued with “very robust” travel advice.

 

Standard
Government, North Korea, Politics, Society, United Nations, United States

Comment: President Trump’s UN speech

DONALD TRUMP

MANY will sense an unmissable irony in President Trump’s address at the United Nations, set-up after the Second World War to promote global peace and co-operation. Mr Trump issued the bluntest of threats to “totally destroy” North Korea.

The only moot point is whether the leader of the free world intends to achieve that objective with a military invasion and conventional weapons, or by means of a nuclear strike.

These are certainly deeply worrying times. A forum meant for dialogue and cultural understanding, has been used by Mr Trump in the delivery of the most incendiary message a world leader could have mustered.

Mr Trump, of course, is no admirer of the UN, and has been constantly dismissive of the global body since coming to presidential office. Up until now, that criticism has been accepted as the usual bluster we have become accustomed to.

This week, however, his rhetoric moved to a new level. In vowing to obliterate North Korea, the American President is deliberately provoking Kim Jong-un, and by resorting to the playground tactic of name-calling with his reference to “Rocket Man”, many observers will wonder if he is laughing at the North Korean leader.

This sort of approach by Mr Trump has worked well for him in the New York real estate market, where the winner takes all, and risks can be handsomely rewarded. It now looks as if he believes that a similar sort of approach can produce the same sort of results in war games, when the reality is that there would no winners. A strike on North Korea would almost certainly prompt counter-attacks on every territory within range of Kim Jong-un’s armoury – South Korea, China, Japan, Russia – and that is before account is taken of the secondary effects of fall-out from a nuclear explosion.

The danger in all of this is that Trump’s baiting of the North Korean leader could be enough to spark warfare. If we are unsure of what Trump’s actual strategy is, we have no idea what his counterpart is thinking right now, or how close to the edge he might already be. Kim is clearly irrational and unstable.

The other great irony from Mr Trump’s war-mongering address is that he is looking for backers to endorse his positioning. But a glance around the room would have seen only despair from the assembled delegates.

Mr Trump’s only known way of dealing with conflict is to goad, and growl threats which put every one of us at risk. There must be a better way.

Standard
Government, North Korea, Politics, Society, United Nations, United States

UN General Assembly – Trump: I’ll destroy North Korea and its Rocket Man

UNITED NATIONS

President Donald Trump delivers tough-talking at the UN General Assembly. Mr Trump gave warnings on North Korea, the Iran nuclear deal, Venezuela and on Socialism.

IN a blistering address to the UN General Assembly in New York earlier this week, Donald Trump vowed to “totally destroy” North Korea if it targets the United States or its allies with nuclear weapons. The US President labelled North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un a “Rocket Man on a suicide mission”.

Mr Trump accused the “depraved” regime in Pyongyang of starving millions of its own people to fund its nuclear programme, and of torturing and killing “countless others” in its efforts to retain power.

Kim has shocked the world with a series of nuclear and ballistic missile tests in recent months and has vowed he will not rest until he has a nuclear arsenal to rival America’s.

Mr Trump vowed merciless reprisals if North Korea acts on its threats.

“No nation on Earth has an interest in seeing this band of criminals arm itself with nuclear weapons and missiles,” he said. “The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.”

The uncompromising language at the world’s leading diplomatic forum will dismay those hoping to avoid war on the Korean peninsula.

Downing Street has said the Government remains committed to finding a “peaceful resolution” to the crisis.

A spokesperson for Number 10 described Pyongyang’s recent actions as “provocative and destabilising”, but added: “No-one wants to see military action, but as we progress with efforts to secure a peaceful diplomatic resolution it would be wrong to rule anything out.”

In a wide-ranging speech, Mr Trump also took aim at a string of other countries on collision course with the US, including Iran, Venezuela and Cuba.

And he issued a veiled warning to China and Russia over their expansionist ambitions and their willingness to trade with North Korea.

The President savaged the Iran nuclear deal signed by his predecessor Barack Obama – and suggested the US could pull out of it.

The deal lifts sanctions against the Tehran regime in return for assurances it will drop its dream of building a nuclear bomb.

Mr Trump described the Iranian regime as a “corrupt dictatorship… which has turned a wealthy country, with a rich history and culture, into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed and chaos”.

He added: “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it. Believe me.”

Israel welcomed the intervention, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying he had “never heard a bolder or more courageous speech” at the UN. But veteran Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein said: “The goals of the United Nations are to foster peace and promote global co-operation.

“Today, the President used it as a stage to threaten war.”

“He aims to unify the world through tactics of intimidation, but in reality he only further isolates the United States.”

In an ominous warning, Mr Trump also warned the US “cannot stand by and watch” while the socialist regime in Venezuela “destroys a prosperous regime”.

Rounding on dictator Nicolas Maduro, he said: “The situation is completely unacceptable.”

He added: “The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented. From the Soviet Union to Cuba to Venezuela, wherever true socialism or communism has been adopted, it has delivered anguish and devastation and failure.

“Those who preach the tenets of these discredited ideologies only contribute to the continued suffering of the people who live under these cruel systems.”

Mr Trump also issued a warning to world leaders on the need to tighten borders to stem the flow of migrants around the world. He said mass migration was “deeply unfair to both the sending and the receiving countries”.

And he warned that “substantial costs of uncontrolled migration” were “borne overwhelmingly by low-income citizens whose concerns are often ignored by both media and government”.

Mr Trump said he would not back away from his “America First” agenda – and urged other nations to follow suit.

“As President of the United States, I will always put America first,” he said. “Just like you, as the leaders of your countries, will always and should always put your countries first.”

Mr Trump also served notice on the UN that, like NATO, it could not expect the US to continue to pay an “unfair burden” towards its running costs.

The packed General Assembly hall greeted Mr Trump’s tough rhetoric with periods of silence punctuated by polite applause during his 42-minute speech.

Standard