Government, Politics, Society, United States

U.S. Finance Bill

UNITED STATES

Intro: President Trump unveils his first finance bill

DONALD TRUMP has promised a “new chapter of American greatness” as he unveiled plans to spend billions of dollars more on defence and building the wall with Mexico.

In his first finance plan, the U.S. President intends to ramp up security by slashing budgets on foreign aid, poverty programmes and the environment.

Defence will receive a 10 per cent increase of some £44billion – the biggest since Ronald Reagan’s boost in the 1980s.

Officials say the money would be used to “accelerate the defeat” of Islamic State and ensure U.S. troops were the “most ready forces in the world”.

Homeland Security will also see its budget rise by 7 per cent, assigning £2.3billion for building the border wall.

The Environmental Protection Agency will be cut by 31 per cent, the State Department by 28 per cent, and Health and Human Services by 17.9 per cent.

Climate change research is to be axed completely, along with smaller agencies financing the arts, public service broadcasting, and legal aid for the poor.

Standard
Government, Politics, Society, United States

Donald Trump should deal with what he was elected to do

UNITED STATES

Intro: President Trump has more pressing issues to contend with than constant squabbling with his political opponents.

IT WAS IN 1987 when Donald Trump wrote in his book The Art of the Deal, ‘you can get any job done through sheer force of will’. This has come to be reflective of his attitude that is both his strength and weakness.

It got him elected President of the United States against all predictions; but it has also made the first few weeks of his tenure in the White House a somewhat surreal experience for those looking in.

The fact that Mr Trump is not a politician in the conventional sense was well known to voters before last November’s election. It will take time for him to become familiar with presidential protocols and in becoming more accommodating, rather than disdainful, of aspects of the office he now holds. Indeed, it was largely this image of the anti-libertarian and anti-establishment figure that appealed to millions of American voters.

But even though he won he continues to act as though he were the loser. He fixated for a while on the fact that Hillary Clinton obtained more votes than he did, despite the college electoral system declaring him the winner.

In recent days, he has accused his predecessor Barack Obama of authorising the tapping of his campaign HQ telephone in Trump Tower, but without providing corroborating evidence to substantiate the claim. The FBI has denied it ever happened, which is tantamount to accusing Mr Trump of lying.

It is not a healthy state of affairs for the president and his intelligence agencies to be constantly at war. Mr Trump has now signed a revamped immigration ban wholly aimed at stopping terrorists entering the US, but is becoming increasingly alarmed at the belligerence being displayed by North Korea. Its latest indiscipline includes the firing of three ballistic missiles towards Japan.

As the leader of the world’s most powerful nation there are far more important things for him to be getting on with. Mr Trump no longer needs to keep fighting opponents he has already defeated.

Standard
Britain, NATO, Russia, United States

US-UK relations on NATO and Russia

WASHINGTON-LONDON

trump-may-reaffirm-us-uk-special-relationship

Ties between the US and Britain have “never been stronger”, US President Donald Trump said as he welcomed British Prime Minister Theresa May to the White House.

President Donald Trump is 100 per cent behind NATO, Theresa May has declared.

Following their first talks in the White House, the Prime Minister has said that the U.S. and UK were united in their “unshakeable commitment” to the alliance, and that both leaders recognise NATO as the “bulwark of our collective defence”.

However, the pair are set for a collision course on how to handle Vladimir Putin after President Trump said he hoped to have a “fantastic relationship” with the Russian leader. The British Prime Minister said she strongly supported continuing sanctions against Russia, but Mr Trump’s newly assembled administration said the lifting of sanctions was on the table.

Earlier this month, the president caused alarm across Europe as he dismissed NATO as “obsolete” and expressed a desire for warmer ties with Mr Putin. During his election campaign Mr Trump even suggested he could withdraw the US from the military alliance if other European members did not spend more money on defence.

Mrs May has pledged to work in persuading other EU leaders to meet their NATO commitment of spending 2 per cent of national income on defence. She has said that member states need to make sure they are equipped to fight terrorism and cyber warfare, as well as combatting conventional forms of war.

But, there are clear differences between the US and UK on Russia. In comments that would have been alarming to No 10, the president said of Mr Putin: ‘I don’t know the gentleman. I hope we have a fantastic relationship. That’s possible and it’s also possible that we won’t. We will see what happens.’

President Trump, said: ‘I have had many times where I thought I would get along with people and I don’t like them at all… And I have had some where I didn’t think I was going to have much of a relationship and it turned out to be a great relationship.’

Mr Trump has also said that he hoped for a ‘great relationship’ with China.

Mrs May said the UK would not back down on Russian sanctions amid suggestions Mr Trump could agree to lift them.

The Prime Minister said: ‘As far as the UK is concerned on sanctions for Russia in relation to their activities in the Ukraine, we have been very clear that we want to see the Minsk agreement (aimed at resolving the conflict between Ukraine and pro-Russian rebels) fully implemented.

‘We believe the sanctions should continue until we see that Minsk agreement fully implemented, and we’ve been continuing to argue that inside the European Union.’

Mr Trump has not answered directly whether he would remove the measures. A senior adviser to the U.S. President said that US sanctions against Moscow, and other issues, would be on the table.

Barack Obama’s administration and the EU hit Moscow with sanctions for sending in troops and supporting pro-Russian rebels in Ukraine. Earlier this month Mr Trump suggested his administration could lift them in return for a nuclear arms deal – irrespective of whether Mr Putin withdrew troops from the Ukraine.

The comments have sparked fears that an emboldened Russia could launch a full-scale invasion in the Ukraine or Baltic States.

Responding to the possibility of sanctions being lifted, the former head of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said: ‘I would urge strong caution against reversing any sanctions on Russia without concrete concessions.

‘Easing sanctions will only embolden Russia’s aggression in the region, putting the security interests of Ukraine and the United States in jeopardy.’


The U.S. softens its stance on torture

Donald Trump has dropped his controversial threat to revive the use of torture. This follows a warning from Theresa May who said it would force Britain to curb intelligence sharing.

In what will be seen as a dramatic about-turn, the US President has indicated that he would not now order secret service interrogators to use torture despite maintaining “it works”. Mr Trump said he would defer to his security advisers who are overwhelmingly opposed to the use of torture.

Mr Trump sparked an angry backlash when he first spoke out in favour of waterboarding, saying the West had to “fight fire with fire” in the war on terrorism.

His comments sparked alarm in the British intelligence community, with sources warning rules banning intelligence sharing with states that use torture would prohibit vital co-operation with the US. The U.S. President said he was bowing to the advice given to him by his Defence Secretary, General James Mattis, who has seen active service in the Middle East and who is opposed to torture.

Protagonists argue that extreme interrogation methods should be used if it saves lives.

Standard