Consumer Affairs, Energy, Government, Society

Smart Meters and the ‘hidden agenda’

ENERGY USAGE

Smart Meters

ENERGY firms using smart meters have a “hidden agenda” to charge customers more when demand for power surges, an expert has warned.

The technology has been promoted as a way of ending estimated bills and giving households real-time information on how much energy they are using.

But it will also allow firms to introduce a raft of new tariffs that will hit those who use electricity and gas at peak times with higher charges.

Under these “time-of-use” tariffs those who use appliances at off-peak times overnight will be rewarded with low rates. This will have the effect of spreading out demand over a 24-hour period. This is seen as an advantage by the Government and energy industry because it means fewer power stations are needed to cover the daily peak.

. See also Concern over energy firms refusing to pass on price cuts…

But the move towards these tariffs raises the prospect of surge pricing during holiday periods when millions of householders are using appliances at the same time.

The former head of gas and electricity meter technology at the energy regulator OFGEM, Jerry Fulton, said the industry will quickly move beyond a two-tier peak and off-peak system to prices that change depending on demand every 30 minutes. He said: “I believe that the hidden agenda behind smart meters is that they will allow half-hourly charging.

“Instead of having two charge rates – day and night – the price of energy will change every half hour, so when solar and wind generation are low and usage is high the price of electricity will rise steeply.”

Unlike ordinary meters, smart devices transmit information about when households use most energy to suppliers.

The default setting on most means that the machines send a total usage figure to suppliers once a month. Customers can change this to send their data as often as every half an hour.

These regular updates are essential for those who have signed up to a tariff where prices vary depending on the time of day. This type of tariff was first offered by British Gas two years ago.

It ran trials giving smart meter customers free electricity for eight hours on either a Saturday or Sunday in an attempt to encourage them to shift heavy power use to this off-peak period.

Another smaller provider, Green Energy UK, has already launched a “time-of-day” tariff where prices vary between periods of high and low demand. It charges five times more for electricity used in early evening than it does overnight.

More of these types of tariffs are expected to flood the market as the rollout of smart meters continues. They are not yet compulsory, but suppliers must at least offer every household a smart meter by 2020.

Critics say everyone cooking family meals, watching prime-time TV shows and heating their homes in the evenings will be penalised by time-of-day tariffs. Higher charges are also likely to apply in the mornings when people are taking showers and heating their homes as they get ready for the day ahead.

A spokesperson for the comparison site Energy helpline, said: “Energy prices are confusing enough and fluctuating half-hourly tariffs will complicate matters further. How are you supposed to know when to turn the dishwasher on when the cost is continually changing?

“For years the Government has been saying it wants to simplify the energy market for customers. This will do the exact opposite.”

Standard
Arts, Books, Legal, Literature, Scotland

Book Review: Conan Doyle For The Defence

SCOTLAND: TRUE CRIME

Fox

Conan Doyle For The Defence by Margalit Fox

Intro: How the creator of Sherlock Holmes unravelled a real murder and deeply troubling miscarriage of justice

ON JANUARY 25, 1925, a prisoner was released from Peterhead jail. Concealed beneath his dentures, so the prison authorities could not find it, was an urgent note from a fellow convict.

It included a message for one of the most famous men in the world – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes.

Oscar Slater, the man who sent the message, had already spent 16 years in prison for a murder he did not commit.

In 1908, an 82-year-old spinster, Marion Gilchrist, was living in a large flat in a prosperous neighbourhood of Glasgow. On the evening of December that year, her maid popped out to buy a newspaper. She was gone for just 15 minutes, but when she returned she found her mistress bludgeoned to death.

“Miss Gilchrist,” reports Margalit Fox in this gripping account of the murder and its aftermath, “had been beaten so savagely that autopsy photographs depict a face that looks as though it had never been human.”

Oscar Slater, whose real name was Oscar Leschziner, was born in Germany in 1872. He had lived in New York, London, Paris and Brussels as well as Glasgow. He moved in a dodgy underworld of chancers and semi-criminals, but he had no record of violence.

There was not a single link between him and Miss Gilchrist. Almost certainly, he had never heard of her before he was accused of killing her.

Unfortunately, the police were looking for a suspect. In Slater – a gambler, a foreigner, a Jew and a less than solid citizen – they found an ideal candidate.

His pawning of a brooch similar to one stolen from Miss Gilchrist brought him to their attention. It was not Miss Gilchrist’s brooch but this scarcely mattered. The police wanted him found guilty. In what Conan Doyle later called “a disgraceful frameup”, they made sure he would be.

Witnesses had seen a man leaving the scene of the murder.

In an identity parade, dark-haired, olive-skinned Slater was placed among 11 pale, pink Scotsmen. As a journalist later wrote, it was “like attempting to conceal a bull-dog among ladies’ poodles”. Unsurprisingly, the witnesses picked out Slater.

All evidence in Slater’s favour was either ignored or suppressed. At his trial, the judge gave a summing-up that was outrageously biased against him.

He was found guilty and sentenced to death. He had always been fascinated by machinery, but Slater surprised his warders by taking an interest in the gallows that was being constructed to hang him.

However, he was not to become too intimately acquainted with it – his sentence was commuted to life imprisonment.

In the words of a writer at the time, he was “held to be too guilty to be released, yet not guilty enough to be hanged”.

It was at this point that Conan Doyle became involved. With his big build and walrus moustache, he looked more Dr Watson than Holmes. But, Conan Doyle had a track record for reversing miscarriages of justice. Using observation and logic like his world-famous creation, he had already cleared the name of George Edalji in as bizarre a case as any Holmes had faced.

 

AN ANGLO-Indian solicitor living in the Midlands, he had been convicted of a series of animal maimings. Conan Doyle demonstrated that the man could not have been responsible.

Conan Doyle’s first efforts for Slater were unsuccessful and the convicted man continued to suffer in prison for years. Margalit Fox quotes extensively from his moving letters to his family back in Germany, which show he was very far from the unfeeling monster that had been described in court.

When Conan Doyle received the tiny note from the dentures in 1925 (it still exists in the Mitchell Library in Glasgow), he was inspired to try again. Times had changed, and Slater had so obviously been the victim of official dishonesty and incompetence that finally, after 18 years inside, the work of Conan Doyle and other supporters had its reward.

Slater was released from Peterhead prison on November 14, 1927. The rest of the story is not always a happy one.

Conan Doyle and Slater, who only met once face-to-face, fell out over money.

Slater was granted compensation of £6,000.

Conan Doyle thought he was honoured-bound to reimburse some of his supporters’ expenses. But Slater didn’t. The two men never communicated again.

And after 20 years of freedom, Oscar Slater died at his home in Ayr in 1948.

Nobody knows for certain who killed Marion Gilchrist. The only certainty is that it wasn’t Oscar Slater, who suffered one of the worst miscarriages of justice in Scottish legal history.

Margalit Fox’s engrossing book brings his case back to vivid life and highlights the part played in it by the creator of the world’s most famous detective.

Standard