Arts, Books

Book Review: The Sun Does Shine

MEMOIR

Intro: Anthony Hinton tells of his thirty years on death row for a crime he didn’t commit

AROUND midnight on July 25/26, 1985, two things happened 15 miles away from each other in Birmingham, Alabama. At 11.57pm, Anthony Ray Hinton, 29, clocked in for his night shift at Bruno’s supermarket warehouse. He worked in the locked warehouse until 4am.

. See also Book Review: ‘The Innocent Man’…

In another area of the city, the manager of Quincy’s steak house, Sidney Smotherman, was driving home at 12.30am, when he was bumped from the rear and forced at gunpoint to drive back to the restaurant where he was shot in the head but not killed.

Later shown a selection of photographs of suspects, Smotherman identified Anthony Ray Hinton as the gunman who had shot him. As it happened, there had been two murders of restaurant managers in Birmingham in similar circumstances in that same year.

A week later Hinton was mowing the lawn at home, where he lived with his beloved mother – both were regular churchgoers – when two policemen came to arrest him.

After entering the house, the police officers removed his mother’s .38 calibre pistol, which they would wrongly identify as the weapon used in all three crimes.

The nightmare then begun in earnest. Everything would surely be cleared up in a couple of hours, Hinton thought, as he climbed into the police car, hands cuffed behind his back. In fact, he would not see freedom again for 30 years. His home, until he was grey-haired, would be a five-by-seven-foot prison cell on death row in the Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore.

Many readers of Hinton’s astonishingly moving memoir are likely to be devoured with a state of open-mouthed incredulity mingled with rage. His utter powerlessness in the face of State-sponsored racism was pitiful.

“The good old boys had traded in their white robes for black ones,” he writes, “but it was still a lynching.”

It was. Black, poor and unable to afford a private attorney, he was given a State attorney called Perhacs, who appointed a ballistics expert who only had one working eye. The expert pronounced that the bullets in the three crimes did not match Hinton’s mother’s gun, but his testimony was torn apart in court, due to his poor eyesight.

There was another horrible twist. A few years earlier, Hinton had made an enemy of a man called Reggie when he dated a girl who had turned Reggie down. Reggie was jealous and bent on revenge. He happened to work at Quincy’s steak house, and he helped to frame Hinton, telling Smotherman he knew a man who fitted the description of his assailant.

 

YET, it would have been impossible for Hinton to get out of the locked warehouse and drive 15 miles and back to commit the crime. Never mind, either, that he passed the lie-detection polygraph test.

“Anything that didn’t make me look like a killer was left out or plain lied about,” Hinton writes. Shackled in court, he had his final say, protesting his innocence to the all-white jury, but to no avail. The death sentence was pronounced and sanctioned on 15 December 1986.

Welcome to death row: the days before the method of killing changed (in 2002) from electric chair to lethal injection.

The prison guards who fed the inmates and who escorted them to the bathroom six days a week were also the ones who killed them on Thursdays.

In his time on death row, Hinton would hear 54 deaths going on down the corridor. When the death-inducing generator was switched on, the lights flickered; all the inmates would then bang their fists against the cell bars to show solidarity with the person being killed, to make them know they were not dying alone.

The most haunting aspects of this book are the small details of life on death row. It might seem a trivial thing, but because there were so many to feed in the vast prison, the death-row inmates got the worst deal when it came to mealtimes.

For 30 years, Hinton was served breakfast at 3am, lunch at 10am and supper at 2pm. All meals were covered in the dust of death, combined with rat hair and cockroach skin.

Wryly, Hinton notes, there’s no “Welcome to your appeal” brochure waiting for you when you first arrive in your cell. Once you’re in, it’s very hard indeed to get out. The State of Alabama had no intention of admitting it had ever made a mistake.

For the first three years, Hinton was in such a state of rage that he refused to speak, except to his mother and best friend Lester on the monthly visiting day.

His mother, bewildered by the events, would dress in her Sunday best for visits: ivory gloves, flowery dress and wide blue hat rimmed with lace. “Are you coming home soon, baby?” she would ask him, again and again.

The steadfastness of those two kept him going through the dark decades. It was a seven-hour roundtrip for them to visit. As his mother became older and ill from stress, she could no longer do the journey. But Lester always turned up.

One night, after three years of silence, Hinton heard the man in the next-door cell sobbing. He broke his silence. “Hey! Are you all right over there?”

The man told him that his mother had just died. “And my heart broke,” Hinton writes. From that moment, he began to come back to life and started to engage with others. He requested to the warden that he and some other inmates might be allowed to start a book club, and this was granted.

They sat round discussing Uncle Tom’s Cabin: “The point,” Hinton writes, “was to get them thinking about anything but the dark, grimy, hot hell of the row.” And by hot, he meant it: it was 110f in the summer in the cells. No cooling fans were allowed for fear of the blades being refashioned into weapons.

 

ONE by one members of the club disappeared. Their death-dates were announced, giving them a month’s notice.

In one particular moving section, Hinton makes friends with a fellow inmate and book club member, a white man called Henry. He finds out a few weeks into their friendship that Henry is in fact the murderer Henry Hays, who was on death row for kidnapping and stringing up a black boy.

When Henry is killed in the normal way – bag over his head, generator switched on – everyone bangs their fists on the bars in solidarity, just as they would for a black man.

Death row is a great leveller. “Henry was my friend,” Hinton writes. “I had shown him compassion because that was how I’d been raised.”

After 15 years of hopelessness, with appeals rumbling on but never amounting to a retrial, Hinton at last acquired an attorney called Bryan Stevenson, who meant business.

Stevenson turned out to be a sort of Oskar Schindler of death row. He fought Hinton’s case in the courts, refusing to give up, for 15 years. At last in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the lower court had made an error all those years ago. “You’re going home, my friend,” Stevenson wrote to him. “You’re finally going home.”

Now living quietly in his original hometown of Praco, near Birmingham, Hinton makes sure he has an alibi for every day of his life. He has filed a compensation claim for $1.5million, but the State has denied it, saying he has not proved his innocence.

As for the State prosecutor, Robert McGregor, he died in 2010. Hinton was just one of scores of people he sent to death row in his career, feeling no stain on his conscience.

At the end of the book, Hinton lists the 1,200 people currently on death row in the U.S. Statistically, it is reckoned ten per cent of them are innocent.

In one of the many cruel injustices of this story, Hinton’s release came far too late to be reunited with his mother: she had died 13 years earlier.

Yet when Hinton walked out into freedom, cameras flashing, he was asked to say a few words. “The sun does shine,” he said. That’s the title of this unforgettable book.

– The Sun Does Shine by Anthony Ray Hinton is published by Rider for £8.99, 368pp

Standard
Arts, Books, History, Science, Scotland

Book Review: Green Gold

BOOK REVIEW

Green Gold by Gabriel Hemery is published by Unbound. It is the story of a brave Scottish botanist who fell of the edge of the world without a trace.

Intro: In 1850 young Scottish plant hunter John Jeffrey is despatched by an elite group of Victorian subscribers to seek highly-prized exotic tree and plant species in North America. An early letter home tells of a 1,200-mile transcontinental journey on foot.

IN Victorian times, plant-hunters were the astronauts of their age. They captured the popular imagination as they set off on exotic expeditions to discover new flora and fauna.

Like space travel today, these excursions were fraught with danger.

When 23-year-old John Jeffrey left his native Scotland for the Pacific coast of North America in 1850, he would have been familiar with the fate of his compatriot David Douglas 16 years earlier. The man, after whom the Douglas fir was named, perished when he fell – or likely was pushed – into a bull-pit in Hawaii.

At least we know what happened to him. For poor Jeffrey, however, who was last seen in San Francisco in 1854, disappeared without a trace. In this captivating book, forest scientist Gabriel Hemery offers the most informed speculation about his fate. Jeffrey kept diaries, now lost. So Hemery, who probably knows more about Jeffrey than anyone alive, has used his extensive research to fictionalise them.

They are interspersed with actual letters and other documents, which record that Jeffrey was despatched to North America thanks to a Victorian version of crowdfunding.

Shares in his expedition cost £5 each, and the list of 140 subscribers reads like a Who’s Who of high society, all looking to enhance their hothouses with the exotica he sent home. Their investment reaped some dividends. Visitors to the Royal Botanic Gardens in Edinburgh can now see the vibrant pink bloom Dodecatheon jeffreyi, also known as Jeffrey’s shooting star, which he found in California.

Jeffrey, a botanist hired by the keeper of that very garden, had never even been out of Scotland before, but soon found himself embarking on the Hudson’s Bay Company ship, the Prince of Wales.

He was tasked with getting across Canada to Vancouver Island, and then down through Washington state, Oregon and California and as far down as Mexico.

His instructions were clear: ‘You will collect seeds of all such trees, shrubs and plants as are not already introduced into this country.’ They wanted him to send back beetles, too. His remuneration was fixed at £80 per annum.

He arrived in Canada in August 1850. He made the long trek west by dogsled and canoe, then crossed the Rocky Mountains on foot. It took him another 12 months to reach the Pacific coast.

In November 1851, a box sent by Jeffrey was excitedly opened in Edinburgh, by members of the Oregon Botanical Association. It contained a few varieties of pine cone, several dead birds, and a small bottle containing beetles. They were underwhelmed.

Jeffrey’s reputation back home seems to have gone steadily downhill after that. He kept sending boxes, but they didn’t contain enough seeds for the Association’s liking. And Jeffrey’s letters and correspondence got fewer and briefer. One tersely explained that, while camping, most of his seeds had been eaten overnight by a rat.

At that time, the California Gold Rush was in full swing. It could well have been that Jeffrey, disillusioned with the comments from Edinburgh, decided that the earth held far more alluring treasures than plants. Hemery’s research has uncovered other possibilities: Jeffrey simply fell in love and absconded, maybe with a Native American woman, and settled down. Or that he was robbed and murdered.

What we know for sure is that Jeffrey’s letters dried up altogether and there were no more sightings of him, to the fury of his paymasters. In March 1854, they decided to relieve him of his duties, even though he had effectively beaten them to it.

The Association’s minutes record little appreciation of what Jeffrey had sent home, yet that amounted to at least 400 plant specimens and the seeds of 199 species.

No attempts were made to find him. But this fascinating book now helps to ensure that he is remembered for his achievements, and not simply for going missing.

– Green Gold by Gabriel Hemery is published by Unbound for £10.99, 280pp

Standard
Arts, Films

Film Review: Tolkien (12A)

REVIEW

Nicholas Hoult in Tolkien, a sober affair that is driven by love and friendship.

TOLKIEN is driven by love. It is about the passion that J.R.R. Tolkien (Nicholas Hoult), creator of The Hobbit and The Lord Of The Rings, had for his wife, Edith (Lily Collins). In telling the story of his early years, it also chronicles his love for his friends, and for language itself. It is a likeable picture, a bit anodyne in parts, rather clunky in others, but it has a great heart.

Film Trailer (approx. 2.5 minutes)

It opens on nightmarishly familiar images of the Somme, and then whisks us back in time to show us young Ronald’s eventful early childhood. Around the turn of the 20th century, his widowed mother – the person who auspiciously first filled his head with stories of dragons and derring do – falls on what she calls “impecunious circumstances”, and uproots Ronald and his younger brother from a rural idyll to soot polluted Birmingham.

But then she dies, and his guardian, a kindly Catholic priest (Colm Meaney), moves the orphaned Ronald (played at this stage by Harry Gilby) to a kind of middle-class orphanage owned by a pompous matron (Pam Ferris). That’s where he falls for Edith, who becomes the love of his life.

Finnish director Dome Karukoski’s film explores their burgeoning relationship, and her influence on him, but also dwells on his coterie of schoolfriends, with whom Ronald forms a club, a fellowship, devoted to “changing the world through the power of art”.

His brilliant mind and academic prowess continues to broadens at Oxford, where he is mentored by a venerable professor of Middle English, sweetly played by Derek Jacobi. It is, though, his friends who influence him most, and he becomes especially attached to one of them, aspiring poet Geoffrey Bache Smith (Anthony Boyle).

Later, in one of the flits back and forth to the Somme, we see him and Geoffrey endlessly calling each other’s name on the battlefield. In scenes that are meant to be deeply poignant, cynics may wonder whether they shouldn’t perhaps be attempting to kill enemy soldiers rather than trying to locate each other like Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in the briny at the end of Titanic. Tolkien, for all its slight deficiencies, is a highly watchable film.

Aptly, for a biopic of perhaps the greatest of all fantasy writers, it is nicely written, by Stephen Beresford – who scripted the hugely engaging 2014 film Pride – and David Gleeson.

And while it no doubt takes plenty of dramatic licence, it is hard to see what might offend the author’s surviving relatives, who have strenuously objected to it being made at all.

Verdict: Big-hearted biopic

★★★

Standard