. Also In the Book Club series: Diary of an MP’s wife
Category Archives: Arts
Drama: The murder of Fred Henderson
WHODUNIT MURDER MYSTERY
SCENE
FRED HENDERSON died on Friday night. Several witnesses in the area heard the gunshot, placing the time of death at shortly after ten o’clock. Inspector McIntyre wasn’t particularly surprised by the news. A low-rent career criminal, Henderson had been violent, and although he had managed to avoid any murder convictions, he had never been likely to enjoy a long life. Appearances suggested that Henderson had been going to a meeting of some sort. There was a note in his breast pocket, and although the bullet had ripped through it and blood had turned it into a soggy mess, the time 10:15 could still be made out.
The bullet that had been extracted out of him was a .38, and it matched the revolver the police had found in an individual trash container a block away. It had been wiped down, but the lab was going over it to see if anything useful came up. In the meantime, three likely candidates had been brought in for questioning, and were waiting for McIntyre in separate interview rooms.
Lorenzo Holbrook was a local restaurateur with unproven ties to the mob. He was in his fifties and medium height with a stocky build. Bushy grey eyes did nothing to disguise his calculating eyes.
Inspector McIntyre introduced himself and slapped a photo of the victim in front of Holbrook. “Do you know this man?”
Holbrook nodded. “Yeah. Fred Henderson, ain’t it? He comes in the Olive Grove sometimes. Lousy tipper.”
“Can you think of anyone who might wish Mr Henderson harm?”
“Nah. Can’t say I know anyone who wishes him well either, mind.”
“He was murdered last night.”
Holbrook shrugged. “Is that so? Tragic. Tragic.”
“What were you doing around 10pm last night?”
“Washing dishes,” said Holbrook. “What else? I got three staff will vouch for it. I saw someone run down the alley behind my place, though. Little ferrety guy in a hat. It was dark. That’s the best I can do, Inspector.”
Toby Black was a cab driver who had done a stint in prison for armed robbery years before. “I was waiting for a fare who never showed,” he explained. “Dispatch will tell you that. I saw your guy, must’ve been. He hung around for a bit, then checked the time and walked into an alley. It was just across the road from me. A moment later, a tall man in a heavy coat walked in behind him. I remember, because the newcomer was as bald as an egg. There was a pop, and your vic just collapsed. Poor guy never even got the chance to turn round. Then the bald man sprinted off past him, down the alley. I was going to go and see if I could help, really I was, but I was scared in case the bald guy decided to come back to doublecheck. If there’s one thing driving a cab has taught me, it’s that you don’t go looking for trouble. Not in this town.”
The final interviewee, Jesse Hamby, worked in a local bar. Tall and muscular with short hair, he didn’t bother hiding his resentment at being called in by the police. When McIntyre showed him the photo, he shook his head silently.
“Are you sure?” asked McIntyre.
“Sure? Heck, no,” Hamby sneered. “I see four hundred different guys in the bar every week.”
“What were you doing around 10pm last night?”
“Walking home.”
“Did you see or hear anything unusual?”
“You mean apart from a chunky old guy who almost smacked into me, and what looked like a dead man huddled in an alley? Nope.”
McIntyre sighed. “What can you tell me about the dead man?”
Hamby tapped the photo. “You got his picture already.”
“Thank you, Mr Hamby. I’ll be back shortly.” Inspector McIntyre rose and left the room.
Outside, he turned to the officer guarding the interview rooms.
“Make sure no one leaves. I have an arrest warrant to finalise.”
Who is the murderer and how does McIntyre know?
HINT: Wound
– Detection level of difficulty: 5/6
(Philosophy): Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
1770–1831
GEORG HEGEL was born on 27 August 1770, in Stuttgart, Germany. He studied philosophy and classics at Tübingen, and, after graduation, he became a tutor and explored theology. Hegel taught at Heidelberg and Berlin, where he wrote and explored philosophical and theological concepts.
Hegel was a major figure in German idealism. His historicist and idealist account of reality was revolutionary at the time and a major factor in the development of some radical threads of left-wing political thought. His major work, The Phenomenology of Spirit (or mind), was published in 1807. Many of his ideas were developed in other deeply complex works until his death, from cholera, in 1831.
Almost everything that Hegel was to develop over the rest of his life is prefigured in the Phenomenology. The book and text is far from systematic and is generally accepted as difficult to read. The Phenomenology attempts to present human history, with all its revolutions, wars, and scientific discoveries, as an objective and idealistic self-developing Spirit or Mind.
Hegel is a notoriously difficult philosopher to understand. For a beginner with next to no grounding in the Greek logic of Aristotle and the later works of Descartes, Hume and Locke it is probably a forlorn task best left until the fundamentals of philosophy are mastered. Being able to comprehend what he writes requires a grasp of at least the basics. Hegel still causes frustration among academics and one of the philosophers that give the discipline its forbidding reputation.
For example, in his book Hegel, Edward Caird writes: “But the height of audacity in serving up pure nonsense, in stringing together senseless and extravagant mazes of words, such as had previously been known only in madhouses, was finally reached in Hegel… and became the instrument of the most bare-faced general mystification that has ever taken place, with a result which will appear fabulous to posterity, and will remain as a monument to German stupidity.”
To have any chance of understanding Hegel one must first come to terms with the principle of the dialectic method. This is a type of argument or discussion between two or more opposing viewpoints whereupon the outcome or truth can be distilled. As the mechanism for this process Hegel proposed variations on the three “classical laws of thought” – that is, the law of identity (essentially “truths” that are taken to be self-evident), and the laws of [non]contradiction and the law of the excluded middle. Paraphrasing these last two suggests respectively that contradictory statements cannot both be true but that either proposition must be true. This is the kind of difficulty that any student of philosophy will be faced with.
Hegelian dialectics is based upon four concepts:
. Everything is transient and finite, existing in the medium of time.
. Everything is composed of contradictions (opposing forces).
. Gradual changes lead to crisis or turning points when one force overcomes its opposing force (quantitative change leads to qualitative change).
. Change is helical (spiral), not circular.
In summary, Hegel believed that when our minds become fully conscious, awakened, or enlightened, we will have a perfect understanding of reality. In short, our thoughts about reality, and reality itself, will be the same. He argues this by showing that the mind goes through an evolution on its way to what he calls “absolute spirit”.
Because Hegel’s philosophy requires a journey it can be seen that it is the process and not just the result that is important. A struggle exists between one viewpoint (or thesis) to which there might exist one or more opposing viewpoints (or antithesis). A process of debate or connected dispute such as revolution or war might lead to a higher level of understanding (or synthesis) to which another antithesis might emerge and thus the process towards truth will continue. This is a Hegelian description of all history as an inevitable progression towards truth. It is complex and a difficult area of study.
Hegel’s mark on history has been profound, in that his influence has spread throughout both left- and right-wing political thought. Marx drew influence from Hegel by developing the idea that history and reality should be viewed dialectically and that the process of change – the struggle – should be seen as a transition from the fragmentary towards the complete. Yet, this is a skewed development of what Hegel tried to suggest in Phenomenology. However, in practical terms it is likely that Hegel may have approved of Marx’s revolutionary interpretation, as he was witness at close hand to revolutionary Europe towards the end of the eighteenth century.
. Hegel on Reason and Experience
“Truth in philosophy means that concept and external reality correspond.
Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights.”


