Britain, Environment, Government

Energy firms heavily criticised by MPs on the Energy and Climate Change Committee…

ENERGY FIRMS SLAMMED

A major report by MPs has warned that swingeing green stealth levies on energy bills are ‘perverse’ and should be scrapped.

MPs also call for middle-class pensioners to lose their winter fuel allowance, with the savings redirected to help low-income households insulate their homes.

They have also attacked the regulator OFGEM for failing to hold giant energy firms to account for soaring prices.

The findings were delivered in a report by the Commons energy and climate change committee, which warns that, based on Government estimates, green levies will add a third to electricity prices by 2020 – even before likely rises in wholesale prices are factored in.

The Government has been accused of using stealth taxes to fund the huge subsidies given to green energy firms. These are needed, ministers say, to meet controversial carbon reduction targets set by the last government.

But MPs on the Commons energy and climate committee have warned that most families have no idea that the green energy drive is costing them dear. Their report states:

… There is no widespread understanding by consumers of how much of their bills is made up of levies.

The average family pays £1,267 towards energy bills, with £112 comprising green taxes – £18 of which is directly spent on subsidising giant wind farms. By 2020 the contribution will have increased by more than 150 per cent, with each household estimated to pay £286 as part of their bills, according to the Department for Energy and Climate Change.

The committee’s report also says:

… Increasing use of levies on bills to fund energy and climate policies is problematic since it is likely to hit hardest those least able to pay.

MPs on the committee suggested that if the green subsidies are to continue they should be funded through the tax system which is more transparent and ‘less regressive than the levies’.

The report questions the repeated claims by ministers that families will see lower bills as a result of Government policies, which include measures to promote energy efficiency. The committee is calling on ministers to start an ‘honest conversation’ about the fact that energy bills are highly likely to continue to rise.

Since 2007, average prices of gas and electricity have increased by 41 per cent – 20 per cent in real terms – leaving millions of households in ‘fuel poverty’. MPs warned that the public’s ‘deep mistrust’ of energy providers will continue unless they show greater transparency and reassure households that high prices are not fuelling excessive profits.

The Renewable Energy Foundation, a think tank, says there is little or nothing to be said in favour of energy bill levies. They hurt the poor most, they reduce competition in the energy markets and make supplier-switching less effective. The Energy Foundation says that because the levies camouflage government taxation they reduce democratic accountability.

Green taxes account for nearly 10 per cent of energy bills. They include an EU-imposed levy on industry and power generators for each tonne of carbon dioxide emitted, the cost of which is then passed on to consumers.

Customers also cover the cost of energy companies’ obligation to source more electricity from costly renewable sources – such as offshore wind farms and biofuel, to reduce fossil fuel use – and the requirement for suppliers to install free or subsidised heat saving measure, such as loft insulation or draught-proofing.

Whilst David Cameron has ruled out any change to the winter fuel allowance before the election in 2015, the report by MPs re-opens the debate over whether better-off pensioners should continue to receive the payment which is worth up to £300 a year. The cross-party committee is urging ministers to introduce ‘better targeting of the winter fuel allowance through means-testing’ and to consider ‘how savings could be used to boost investment in energy efficiency programmes’.

MPs also said they were ‘disappointed at OFGEM’s slow progress’ in forcing the energy giants to reveal how much they are making from household bills.

The regulator must ‘use its teeth’ and force energy firms to explain the reasons behind price rises, the report says.

Energy firms were also criticised for ‘falling far short of what is required to increase transparency’ as well as failing to improve consumer trust.

But Energy Secretary Ed Davey has rejected the suggestion that ministers were misleading the public over the impact of green measures on bills. He said:

… Our policies to support renewable energy and reduce energy waste are insulating consumers from the rising cost of fossil fuels.

… And by 2020, our analysis shows household energy bills will on average be £166 lower than they would if we did nothing.

COMMENT

After years of relentless price rises, families across Britain are already struggling to pay electric and gas bills which, on average, include £112 in green taxes and levies.

Yet, as Westminster’s climate and energy committee has warned, this crisis is to get much worse – with the value of these ‘perverse’ levies rocketing by 150 per cent between now and 2020.

On countless occasions, government ministers and supine regulators have promised they will force energy companies to introduce simplified, easily comparable tariffs and bills the public can readily understand.

Yet still the obfuscation goes on. As utility charges soar – along with profits for the Big Six – customers remain saddled with indecipherable bills that leave them dumbfounded over whether they are getting the best deal. Charitable organisations, including the Citizen’s Advisory Service, are receiving record numbers of calls from desperate households struggling with debts, after energy bills have rocketed by as much as 40 per cent in real terms since 2007.

And with yet more increases threatened on top of the 11 per cent so far this year, those on fixed low incomes will suffer the most. How much longer can the authorities stand by while this ruthless exploitation continues?

There are many things that could be done. For instance, minsters could scrap the posturing green taxes that already add £112 to average bills. This could be done at a stroke. The regulator, OFGEM, could also do far more by ensuring gas and electricity companies are more transparent and straightforward in their dealings.

Standard
Banking, Britain, Economic, Financial Markets, Government

Lending to small and medium sized firms on course to hit a 7-year low…

BANK LENDING

Bank lending to businesses is projected to slump to its lowest level for seven years, a report from Ernst & Young has warned.

UK banks will lend £422 billion to firms this year – the lowest amount since 2006. This is well below the £575 billion lent in 2008 before the financial crisis.

The figures from the Ernst & Young Item Club underline the crisis facing many companies as banks starve them of the funds they need to grow and prosper. The problem poses a serious threat to the economic recovery.

The Item Club report warns that lending will not return to its pre-recession peak until 2017.

Financial analysts fear small and medium sized firms are struggling to get the funds they need to grow, or by taking on staff that will be needed to drive the economy.

The further fall in lending this year will disappoint officials at both the Treasury and the Bank of England, who launched the £80 billion Funding for Lending scheme last summer.

This scheme was intended to increase the flow of cheap loans for households and businesses.

While there is evidence that mortgage lending is increasing, particularly to first-time buyers, there is little to suggest that small firms are getting access to the money they urgently need.

The Item Club report also showed that around £200 million was lent last year to small and medium-sized enterprises, or SMEs, through ‘peer to peer’ lending – which allows people to lend directly to businesses.

An economic adviser to the Item Club, said:

… We expect peer to peer lending to grow rapidly in the next few years as demand for funding from SMEs outstrips supply from the banks.

The report does predict, though, that bank lending will pick up as the economy recovers, rising to £452 billion next year, £497 billion in 2015, £545 billion in 2016 and £602 billion in 2017.

A spokesperson for the accountancy firm Ernst & Young, said:

… Corporate lending won’t increase enough in 2013 to compensate for the dire first half of the year. We expect it to pick up in 2014, raising hopes that UK companies may invest some of the cash back into the wider economy.

… The banks should be able to increase their credit supply – regulation permitting.

And, despite the recent pick-up in the economy interest rates look set to remain flat lined. The Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, which will meet on Thursday, is widely expected to peg interest rates at 0.5 per cent for a 54th month in a row.

Standard
Britain, Government, Libya, Scotland, United States

Megrahi’s release linked to £400m arms deal. Revelations continue to emerge…

THE LOCKERBIE BOMBER: ABDELBASET AL MEGRAHI

The release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Al Megrahi, was linked to a £400 million arms deal with Libya, according to secret documents.

Following disclosures, obtained under Freedom of Information laws, the documents show ‘reprehensible’ connections between the Labour government that aimed to boost business and freeing the man convicted of Britain’s worst terrorist atrocity.

In an email communication between the then UK ambassador in Tripoli to the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, further details have emerged of how a prisoner transfer agreement was aimed to be signed once Libya had fulfilled its promises to buy an air defence system.

At the time of Megrahi’s release in 2009, Labour’s government under Gordon Brown insisted there was no link to ‘blood money’ trade deals with Colonel Gaddafi.

Megrahi, a Libyan, was convicted under Scots Law of killing 270 people by blowing up a US airliner over the Scottish town of Lockerbie in December 1988. He was sent home early from Greenock prison on compassionate grounds because he had terminal prostate cancer. He died last year. Ministers have always insisted that his release from prison was a decision taken solely by the Scottish Government.

The email was sent by Sir Vincent Fean, then the UK’s most senior diplomat in Libya, to Mr Blair, ahead of his visit to Gaddafi in June 2008. Mr Blair, who quit Downing Street a year earlier, was being updated on the UK’s ongoing relations with the Libyan dictator.

Prior to this, Mr Blair met Gaddafi and his Prime Minister Al-Baghdadi Ali al-Mahmoudi in his infamous visit to Sirte in a desert tent. The meeting thrashed out a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on prisoner transfers just before BP announced the firm was investing £545 million to search for oil reserves in Libya believed to be worth £13 billion.

But according to the email, Mr Blair and Baghdadi agreed Libya would buy a missile defence system from MBDA, part-owned by BAE Systems. When he returned in June 2008 the Government appeared to see a chance for him to push for the arms deal to be sealed.

Sir Vincent Fean wrote:

… There is one bilateral issue which I hope TB (Tony Blair) can raise, as a legacy issue. On 29 May 07 in Sirte, he and Libya’s PM agreed that Libya would buy an air defence system (Jernas) from the UK (MBDA).

… One year on, MBDA are now back in Tripoli aiming to agree and sign the contract now – worth £400 million, and up to 2,000 jobs in the UK. We think we have Col Q’s (Gaddafi’s) goodwill for this contract. This issue can also be raised with Libya’s PM. It was PM Baghdadi who told the media on 29 May 07 that Libya would buy British.

… Linked (by Libya) is the issue of the 4 bilateral justice agreements about which TB signed an MoU with Baghdadi on 29 May. The MoU says they will be negotiated within the year: they have been. They are all ready for signature in London as soon as Libya fulfils its promise on Jernas.

The prisoner transfer agreement was signed in November 2008.

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary in Labour’s Government at the time of Megrahi’s release, said then it was ‘offensive’ to suggest it was linked to improving commercial relations with Libya.

On Sunday, Mandleson said:

… I was not aware of the correspondence covered in the FOI request.

A statement from Mr Blair’s side said the email did not show the UK government was trying to link the defence deal and Megrahi. A spokesperson for Mr Blair, said:

… Actually it shows the opposite – that any linkage was from the Libyan side. As far as we’re aware there was no linkage on the UK side. What the email in fact shows is that, consistent with what we have always said, it was made clear to the then Libyan leader that the release of Megrahi was a matter for Scotland. Of course the Libyans, as they always did, raised Megrahi.

MBDA says the Libyans never signed the arms deal.

But what is startling is the continuing emergence of revelations about the squalid relationship between the Blair government and Colonel Gaddafi.

First we learned of the willingness of the former British prime minister to fawn over an international terrorist as part of a charm offensive to win lucrative oil contracts.

With disclosures released under Freedom of Information, we now discover the grubby deal which allowed the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing to be freed early from a Scottish prison was linked to Libya agreeing to buy £400 million of British arms.

Standard