Britain, Defence, Government, Military

Defence to get billions more to help tackle terror threats

DEFENCE

THE Armed Forces are to be handed billion of pounds to tackle threats from terrorists and hostile states such as Russia.

The Prime Minister has said that the Government would do better on defence in the future to ensure the capabilities meet the changing threats facing the UK.

Details of the promise of billions in the next autumn Budget to Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson came after Theresa May announced a cash injection of £800million to the Ministry of Defence.

The Treasury will release £600million from a contingency fund in the next financial year so it can go towards building a new class of submarines to carry the UK’s nuclear deterrent. This will free up money for operations and training, areas which would have been cut otherwise.

A further £200million will be made available to move forward certain projects this year, which in turn will give the department more room to spend money on other schemes next year.

Mr Williamson said that this is a welcome boost to our Armed Forces, ensuring that the country can be defended and in protecting our national interests with the ultimate capability. The Defence Secretary said that in an increasingly dangerous world we must strengthen our ability to counter the intensifying and evolving threats we face to keep Britain safe.

In the Commons, Mrs May said: “Today’s announcement will ensure the work to rebuild the UK’s new world-class submarines remains on schedule and is another sign of the deep commitment this Government has to keeping our country safe.”

The MoD is carrying out a defence review to examine which areas of the department need more money after dire warnings about the present state of the Armed Forces.

The Modernising Defence Programme comes after a wider Strategic Defence and Security Review in 2015.

The mini review will be published this summer and is expected to say that the MoD needs greater investment in more modern capabilities – and extra resources.

 

SOME within the military are calling the £600million boost for the Ministry of Defence a “minor miracle”.

The Prime Minister said the money would come from underspends elsewhere, adding that the work to rebuild the new nuclear deterrent remains on course.

With an increasingly belligerent Russia sending nuclear-capable bombers towards our airspace, and with their submarines haunting sea approaches to Faslane, this is surely a time for vigilance and internal unity.

Standard
Britain, Defence, Government, National Security, Terrorism

Security Review: Terror threat to UK to get worse

BRITAIN

A SECURITY review warns that Britain could face a greater threat from Islamist terrorism over the next two years.

Intelligence experts fear battle-hardened jihadis in Syria are dispersing to set up cells elsewhere from which to plot attacks on the West.

There are also concerns that die-hard fanatics could try to come back to Britain to carry out massacres.

These factors, on top of concerns that youngsters at home are being easily radicalised on the internet, point to a heightened terror threat.

The assessment comes after MI5 chief Andrew Parker recently warned that the terror threat was already the worst he had ever seen in his 34-year career.

A security shake-up detailed in the National Security Capability Review, states: ‘We expect the threat from Islamist terrorism to remain at its current heightened level for at least two years and it might increase further.’

The review comes in the wake of five terror attacks on British soil last year and this month’s nerve-agent attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, in Salisbury.

In other details from the review, it can be disclosed that:

. The UK will introduce a ‘fusion doctrine’ to use military, financial, cultural and diplomatic clout to quash threats;

. ‘Unprecedented’ levels of intelligence were shared with allies after Salisbury to make the case for action against Russia;

. Russia, Iran and North Korea are identified as the key state-based threats;

. So-called ‘soft power’ such as the BBC’s World Service and social media will be used to tackle misinformation.

The review outlines the threats facing the UK and how the Government plans to deal with them.

In it, Theresa May states: ‘Every part of our Government and every one of our agencies has its part to play. As long as we defend our interests and stand up for our values, there will continue to be those who seek to undermine or attack us. But these people should be in no doubt that we will use every capability at our disposal to defeat them.

‘Over the past year we have witnessed appalling terrorist attacks in London and Manchester. But also a brazen and reckless act of aggression on the streets of Salisbury: Attempted murder using an illegal chemical weapon, amounting to an unlawful use of force against the UK.’

She said national security depended on not only the police, security services and the Armed Forces, but ‘on our ability to mobilise… the full range of our capabilities in concert’.

The nerve-agent attack in Salisbury shows just how important it was to counter propaganda from Russia. The Kremlin had put out more than 20 stories to confuse the picture.

On top of this, up to 2,800 Russian bots – computer programmes that generate posts on social media – are thought to have tried to sow confusion after the poison attack by spreading deliberately fake information. Officials have feared for months that IS jihadists defeated in Iraq and Syria could morph into a new terror group.

But the danger from Islamist extremists moving into other regions seems likely to increase the threat to British citizens. There are, for example, cells in Yemen, Nigeria, Somalia, as well as those remnants that remain in Syria and Iraq. There is no doubt that they will seek to project out.

The biggest shift in the terrorist threat comes from those who have been radicalised in their own communities and through their interactions in cyber space.


. Russia can take fight to space

Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier, Head of the RAF, warns that Russia could defy international rules by attacking in space.

THE UK must be ready to confront Russia in space as technology opens a new frontier, the head of the RAF has said.

In the wake of the Salisbury nerve-agent attack, Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier warned that Moscow could defy rules to attack in space.

He said enemy states were developing space weapons capable of destroying satellites and jamming GPS signals.

The Chief of the Air Staff said the RAF needed to be able to combat such threats. At the Royal Aeronautical Society in London, he said: “We have potential adversaries like Russia who are disregarding the rules-based international system and exploiting environments in whatever way they feel they can to their advantage. I don’t foresee a war in space, but I can see us being contested for use of space and for people trying to deny some of our specific capabilities.

“We already see that to a significant degree and we need to be prepared to deal with that threat.”

His warning of intensifying threats from Russia comes ahead of the publication of a defence review in the summer.

Weapons could affect the ability of aircraft to operate, cripple satnavs and shut down maps on mobile phones.

Consumers could also be stopped from using cashpoints and online banking because such activities rely on satellites and time signals.

Sir Stephen said: “We could look at it and say, ‘Yes that is the theory, but they wouldn’t do it, would they?’ Well they would never launch a nerve-agent on a city in the United Kingdom, would they? But they did. So, we need to be ready for those situations.” Pentagon experts believe Russia and China are developing lasers and missiles that could take out satellites in low-earth orbit, according to reports.

Sir Stephen also hit out at Russia for its use of a military grade nerve agent, as well as the “criminal activities of the Russian state in cyberspace”.

He said: “The post-war consensus that has provided the basis for the rules-based international order is being challenged and undermined.

“We must respond, collectively with our NATO and other partners, to counter hostile acts by Russia against our countries, our interests and our values.”

It comes as Western capitals brace for Kremlin reprisals after the list of British allies kicking out Russian spies over the Salisbury attack grew to 27.

Ireland, Belgium, Macedonia and Moldova have joined the list while NATO said it would cut the Russian delegation at its headquarters by ten.

Moscow has threatened a “tough response” to the expulsions.

. See also Britain’s Military and the 2015 Defence Review…

Standard
Britain, Business, Defence, Government, National Security

The GKN bid and threat to national security?

MELROSE

THE hostile takeover of the defence giant GKN is to be investigated by MPs amid concern that it could harm national security.

In a rare intervention in a corporate takeover, senior executives from GKN and the predatory bidder Melrose are being called before the business committee.

MPs want answers about the risk to jobs, pensions and the manufacture of key military components if the £7.4billion deal goes ahead.

It came as Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson expressed “serious concerns” about the proposed takeover.

Giving evidence to the defence select committee, Mr Williamson said he had written to Business Secretary Greg Clark about the deal, adding: “There is no clarity as to what the true approach is going to be in terms of the GKN military side of the business.

“We sometimes have to ask tough questions as to whether we should raise concerns about the break-up of large successful important businesses that have a real impact upon our national security. It would have been remiss if I didn’t do that on this occasion.”

Turnaround specialist Melrose’s bid for GKN, which employs 6,000 people in the UK and 58,000 worldwide, is facing close-scrutiny amid concerns over its potential impact.

Redditch-based GKN, which is nearly 260 years old, makes parts for fighter jets including the US-UK F-35, the Eurofighter Typhoon, and the US B-21 stealth bomber. It also produces components for aircraft and car firms including Airbus, Mercedes and Toyota.

The Government is investigating whether it could intervene on national security grounds. The business committee is to hold a hearing into the takeover on March 6.

Committee chairman Rachel Reeves said: “GKN is an important company for the UK and globally. This session will be an opportunity to hear from Unite [the union] and for GKN and Melrose to set out their case for the future of the business.”

GKN’s fate was thrown into doubt last month when Melrose tabled its offer to buy the firm, which was rejected by board members as cheap and opportunistic.

Melrose’s strategy is to sell firms on it has acquired at a profit within three to five years, raising fears that GKN will be broken up piecemeal and sold off around the world.

Melrose suffered a £28million loss last year and has presided over factory closures and hundreds of job cuts.

The firm has said it welcomes the opportunity to appear before the select committee. It also said that while it believes there are no competition or national security issues, it asserts that it will be in the national interest for Melrose to be the guardian of GKN businesses. As a British public company, it says it is fully aware of its ownership responsibilities.

GKN said it was happy to give evidence to the committee.

 

AS MPs launch an inquiry into the hostile bid for Britain’s oldest engineering company, it is a relief that Westminster has at last woken up to this grave threat to our national interest.

Anyone who believes the get-rich-quick asset strippers at Melrose are fit to take over GKN should look closely what happened to FKI, another company that fell into their clutches ten years ago.

After selling off most of the firm’s assets for a huge profit, Melrose kept control of gas turbine manufacturer Brush – which has performed weakly ever since, with the threat of job losses now hanging over it.

Earlier this week, Melrose reported a loss of £28million after writing-off £145million from Brush’s value. Can such City takeover firms, relying on loans for their acquisitions, really be trusted to takeover GKN?

For 260 years, this flagship engineering firm has been vital to our defence, making cannonballs for Waterloo and Spitfires for the Battle of Britain. To this day, it remains a world-beater in the sort of technologies we will need after Brexit, whether building parts for stealth aircraft or driveshafts for new electric cars.

True, GKN needs to improve its efficiency. But it would be madness to let it be broken up and sold to the highest bidders at home and abroad.

As leading industrialist and Government adviser Sir Richard Lapthorne puts it: “The hollowing out of Britain’s industrial base has gone too far. The Germans and French would not even dream of allowing this.”

Standard