Health, Medical, Research, Science, World Health Organisation

Coronavirus: How much of a risk are we facing?

CORONAVIRUS

CORONAVIRUSES are a type of virus that can trigger respiratory infections, from bad colds to lethal pneumonia. Seven strains are currently known to circulate among humans. These include SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome). The Wuhan novel coronavirus is a previously unseen strain that originated in central China last month.

The more serious symptoms are typically a fever, cough and breathing problems. Some patients have developed pneumonia, which involves inflammation of the small air sacs in the lungs. Severe lung disease is believed to the cause of at least 25 deaths so far.

Scientists do not yet know if the new virus is as severe or as contagious as SARS. Statistics suggest it kills around 2 per cent of those infected, significantly lower than SARS (10 per cent). If it mutates into a more infectious or lethal strain, the death rate could rise.

Analysis also suggests it may have emerged after viruses found in bats and snakes combined. It is believed that snakes have acted as a ‘reservoir’ that have passed the new virus to humans.

Common sense and basic hygiene, such as washing hands in hot soapy water, will help to protect yourself. Anyone who believes they have been exposed is advised to clean all high-touch surfaces around them, such as counters, doorknobs and phones with a disinfectant. Disinfectants will kill the virus.

Experts are, in general, sceptical about the effectiveness of standard face masks against airborne viruses. But there is evidence they can help people avoid transmitting infection from their hands to their mouths.

The US National Institute of Health has announced it is in the “very preliminary stages” of research to develop a vaccine for the virus.

Standard
Health, Medical, Science

Mindfulness

WELL-BEING & MENTAL HEALTH

Mindfulness

I ran a series of tweets on mindfulness over the past 10 days on the social media networking site Twitter. I have listed here in consolidated form, from the earliest to the most recent.

Attached below is a link that will display the content in PDF format.

Extracts:

‘The experience of people who practise mindfulness is now being backed up by science. Within the past few years, neuroscientists have been using MRI technology to look at the brains of people who meditate. The results have been fascinating.’

‘Mindfulness training draws on the ancient traditions of meditation and yoga, often incorporating insights from modern medicine and psychotherapy.’

‘Buddhist thinkers have taken great interest over the centuries in the way the human mind works.’

‘In the 1990s, mindfulness took a quantum leap into the world of mental health and psychotherapy when three leading psychologists from the UK and Canada developed Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) as a treatment for people with a history of recurrent depression.’

‘Mindfulness can help us to cope better with a range of conditions including chronic pain and heart disease. It has been shown to strengthen the immune system, improving our responses to illnesses ranging from flu to psoriasis and even to HIV.’

The range of content shared can be viewed here (PDF format) > MINDFULNESS

Standard
Britain, Government, Health, Society

Saving the overmighty NHS with little platoons

BEVERIDGE & THE NHS

THE National Health Service, which celebrated its 70th anniversary this summer, is not only the standard-bearer for Britain’s welfare state but also the cuckoo in the nest. The institution is a source of national pride, much loved and admired by the public, but also a source of exasperation. Its regular winter crises and its ongoing struggles with issues such as bed-blocking by older patients and the inability in some cases to offer even a half-decent service – recent figures released suggests that one patient waited more than 62 hours for an ambulance – raises relevant questions about whether taxpayers are getting the services they pay for.

They are certainly paying for it. The NHS’s “birthday present” this year – additional spending of more than £20bn per annum by the early 2020s – will add to the cost of an NHS that already accounts for nearly a third of all spending on public services. This is up from 10% in the early 1950s, and costs about 12 times as much what it did when it was founded.

The financing of the NHS has gone well beyond anything Lord Beveridge envisaged in his 1942 report which provided the blueprint for the postwar welfare state in Britain. The NHS – large, monolithic and one of the biggest employers in the world – has also moved beyond Beveridge in another way.

His 1942 report was one of three he wrote during that decade, the others being Full Employment in a Free Society in 1944 and Voluntary Action in 1948. Before the welfare state was established, much healthcare and support for the poor were provided by a network of voluntary organisations. The system was patchy and fell short of the universal care that was provided in 1948 (and which has expanded hugely since).

Beveridge was clear that the welfare state and voluntary action should be complementary, writing that “the state, in organising security, should not stifle incentive, opportunity, responsibility” and should “leave room and encouragement for voluntary action by each individual”.

Today, some are putting that into practice. HelpForce, for example, is, along with other charitable bodies, providing volunteer support to the NHS and is making a difference. Volunteers who ring patients to remind them of their appointments to attend memory clinics have lifted the attendance rate from 15% to 100%. Motorbike enthusiasts act as volunteer couriers, shipping around blood and other essential supplies.

These efforts are making a difference, but things could go much further. Most people do not even know they can volunteer in an NHS hospital. You might imagine, then, a Britain where millions of people are proud to be the HelpForce – a country where giving back to the NHS and other public services becomes ingrained in our social fabric, where you can expect companionship and support through your entire time in the health system and where communities support nurses and doctors.

It is an attractive proposition. David Cameron, the former prime minister, meant well when he launched his Big Society initiative in 2010. Allowing people to organise and provided for their communities would, he argued, represent “the biggest, most dramatic redistribution of power from elites in Whitehall to the man and woman on the street”. Overcentralisation and bureaucracy had, he said, turned too many public sector workers into the “disillusioned, weary puppets of government targets”.

It is an ambition and a criticism that remain valid but Mr Cameron was, in most respects, the worst person to launch it. Coming hard on the heels of the government’s austerity programme, it looked to some like an attempt to get public services delivered on the cheap. And, perhaps more importantly, the key to building a bigger voluntary contribution should be from the ground up, not from the top of government down.

That entire experiment should not, however, be a source of discouragement. As the experience of HelpForce demonstrates, people want to volunteer and find their involvement fulfilling. Figures from the National Council for Voluntary Organisations show that 35% of men and 39% of women do formal voluntary work at least once a year. More than a fifth of both sexes volunteer once a month or more. There is also a huge untapped resource of people who do not currently volunteer but would like to do so.

There is an optimistic vision here of voluntary action, working in tandem with state-provided public services, to provide the care that our ageing population needs; pensioner numbers are set to increase by some 9million over the next 50 years. It is a vision that fits perfectly with the Beveridge vision of the welfare state. And it is one that should largely be embraced.

Standard