Arts, Psychology, Science

A study finds those who regularly read books are kinder and more emphatic

EFFECTS OF READING

Benefits of reading: Having your nose in a book might seem a little anti-social at times – but reading could actually make you a kinder, more empathetic person, a study has found.

Being regularly engaged and engulfed in books might seem a little anti-social at times, but research has revealed that reading could actually make you a kinder and more empathetic person.

Readers were more likely to act in a socially acceptable manner while those who preferred watching television came across as less friendly and less understanding of others’ views, researchers said.

The 123 participants in the study were quizzed on their preferences for books, TV and plays at Kingston University, London.

They were then tested on interpersonal skills, such as how much they considered people’s feelings and whether they acted to help others.

Researchers told the British Psychological Society conference in Brighton that fiction fans showed more positive social behaviour.

Readers of drama and romance novels were also empathic, while lovers of experimental books showed the ability to see things from different perspectives.

Comedy fans scored the highest for relating to others.

The study suggested reading allows people to see different points of view, enabling them to understand others better.

The researchers added: ‘Exposure to fiction relates to a range of empathetic abilities.

‘Engaging with fictional prose and comedy in particular could be key to enhancing people’s empathetic abilities.’

However, the authors warned the study did not prove cause-and-effect.

So it could be that reading causes positive behaviour, or it could be that thoughtful, well-mannered people are more likely to prefer reading.

Standard
Fitness, Health, Medical, Science

Research reveals that walking is better for the brain than cycling

HEALTH

WALKING is better than cycling for the brain, because striking the ground boosts blood flow.

A stroll is often seen as gentler exercise than a long bike ride.

But as your foot hits the ground, each step sends backward-flowing pressure waves up the arteries, which boost the brain’s blood circulation.

This makes walking better for cerebral blood flow than cycling.

It follows numerous studies showing walking can prevent Alzheimer’s disease, which has been linked with reduced blood flow in part of the brain. Researchers at New Mexico Highlands University say a stroll not only boosts brain function, but may make exercise more enjoyable.

Lead researcher Dr Ernest Greene said: ‘What is surprising is that it took so long for us to finally measure these obvious hydraulic effects on cerebral blood flow.’

The scientists took ultrasounds from 12 healthy adults as they stood upright or walked steadily at a rate of a metre per second.

This calculated the speed of blood flow through vessels including the carotid artery to both sides of the brain. Plodding feet sent pressure waves through the arteries, which modify and increase the brain’s blood supply.

The waves were found to synchronise with the heart rate and stride rate to regulate blood circulation to the brain. While the effect was less dramatic than when running, it was greater than when cycling.

The results, presented to a meeting of the American Physiological Society, show that the brain, as well as the heart and muscles, benefits from going for a walk.

The NHS advises people to take 10,000 steps a day to reduce the risk of stroke, heart disease, type 2 diabetes and asthma.

Appendage:

Walking

Some of the benefits of walking.

Standard
Arts, History, Philosophy, Science

Quantum Leaps: Plato

Portrait of Plato. Luni marble. Roman copy after a Greek original of Silanion. Inv. No. MC 1377. Rome, Capitoline Museums, Museum Montemartini.

Copy after the statue created by the renowned portrait-sculptor Silanion. The original, commissioned by Mithridates, was dedicated to the Muses in the Academy, seat of the philosophical school founded by Plato in Athens.

c. 427 – 347 BC

To understand how Plato came to the conclusions which have exercised such a profound impact on Western thinking, it is necessary to understand his own influences. Born in or around Athens at a time when the city-state was flourishing as one of the most dominant and culturally enlightened places on earth, he was strongly affected by the arguments of another great philosopher, Socrates, who also lived there. Socrates’ approach was to constantly strive for clearer definitions of words and people’s perceptions of those words in order to get nearer to ‘the truth’ that lay behind their often irritational and ill-thought-out use of them. This introduced to Plato the notion of ‘reality’ being distorted by human perceptions, which would become important in his approach to science and, in particular, metaphysics.

. Socrates’ Influence

Socrates’ was executed in 399 BC for allegedly ‘corrupting’ the youth of Athens with his ‘rebellious’ ideas. Reacting to this, Plato fled the city-state and began a tour of many countries which would last more than a decade. On his travels, he encountered a group of people who would become another major influence, the Pythagoreans. Begun by their founder Pythagoras, the school of disciples in Croton continued to promote their ‘all is number’ approach to everything.

. The Theory of Forms

The combination of these two major forces on Plato – plus, of course, his own work – brought him to his Theory of Forms, his main legacy to scientific thought. This consisted of an argument that nature, as seen through human eyes, was merely a flawed version of true ‘reality’ or ‘forms’; in an instructive metaphor, he compares humanity with cave dwellers, who live facing the back wall of the cave. What they perceive as reality, is merely the shadows thrown out by the sun. There is, therefore, little to be learnt from direct observation of them. For Plato, there had always existed an eternal, underlying mathematical form and order to the universe, and what humans saw were merely glimpses of it, usually corrupted by their own irrational perceptions and prejudices about the way things ‘are’.

Consequently, for Plato, like the Pythagoreans, the only valid approach to science was a rational, mathematical one which sought to establish universal truths irrespective of the human condition. This validation of the numerical method strongly impacted on science; disciples following in its tradition ‘made’ discoveries by mathematical prediction. For example, arithmetic calculations would suggest that future discoveries would have particular properties, in the case of unknown elements in Dmitry Mendeleev’s first periodic table for instance, and subsequent investigative work by scientists would prove the mathematics to be true. It is an approach still used by scientists today.

. The Academy

Plato also helped to influence scientific thought in a much more physical sense by founding an Academy on his return to Athens in 387 BC. Some commentators claim this institute to be the first European university, and certainly its founding principles as a school for the systematic search for scientific and philosophical knowledge were consistent with such an establishment. Plato’s influence was pervasive; it is said there was inscription over the entrance to the institute which read, ‘Let no one enter here who is ignorant of geometry.’ Over the subsequent centuries, the Athenian Academy became recognised as the leading authority in mathematics, astronomy, science and philosophy, amongst other subjects. It survived for nearly a thousand years until the Roman emperor Justinian shut it down in 529 AD, around the time the Dark Ages began.

. The Legacy of Plato

Plato is best remembered today as one of the greatest philosophers of the Western tradition. He might not, therefore, be an obvious candidate for inclusion in any compendium of famous or influential scientists. But in exactly the same way that the influence of Plato’s work stretched into many other academic areas such as education, literature, political thought, epistemology and aesthetics, so it is the case with his science.

Although Plato’s scientific and philosophical knowledge has undergone significant revival and reinterpretation over the course of history, his logical approach to science remains influential, standing testament to his far-reaching ideas.

‘Geometry existed before creation.’ – Plato

Standard