Government, Politics, Scotland

Police Scotland: ‘Computer revamp hits £45m’…

SCOTLAND’s unitary police force is facing a fresh crisis after it emerged that the budget for a crime-fighting computer project has almost quadrupled to £45 million.

Earlier this year it was disclosed that Police Scotland is using eight separate IT databases from the former regional system.

The systems, though, are incompatible with each other, despite the merger of Scottish Police forces into a single force on April 1.

This has led to warnings that criminals may escape detection because of poor sharing of intelligence.

At First Minister’s Questions, yesterday, at Holyrood in Edinburgh, Alex Salmond said the cost of replacing the police computer network is estimated to be £45 million over a decade.

The Scottish Government had originally estimated that integrating the systems of the old eight forces would initially cost £12 million over three years.

Lewis Macdonald, the justice spokesman for Labour, said that public faith is dwindling fast following one calamity after another for the new police service.

It has been revealed that police have been privately briefing for two years that integration would cost £45 million. The Scottish Police Authority (SPA), the body set up to oversee the new force, made the revelation. The true figure was only made public yesterday at First Minister’s Questions.

Information and communications technology (ICT) integration has been described as Police Scotland’s priority but critics fear the Scottish Parliament’s scrutiny of ICT has been downgraded following the resignation of three senior SPA executives, events that have prompted claims of a leadership crisis.

Mr Salmond insists the resignations ‘will have no impact’ on ICT integration because the SPA’s chief information officer remains in post. The First Minister said the ‘proposal for the acquisition of the single ICT system to cover recording, management, analysis of data and crime, vulnerable persons, criminal justice and custody, missing persons and property is a major advance’.

The First Minister added:

… Discussions with the SPA indicate the estimated total cost of £45 million over ten years is affordable within their existing budget.

Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) have previously heard the present ‘hamfisted’ IT network still relies on outdated floppy discs, does not comply with police regulations and leave officers open to criticism if a prisoner dies in custody.

South Scotland Labour MSP Graeme Pearson, a member of Holyrood’s justice committee, said:

… This is the first time this number has been brought to light and brings to a conclusion the ambiguity that has existed up to now about the cost and the likely way forward for the service; £12 million was the Government’s guess and it was obviously an unreasonable figure.

Mr Pearson also said that a highly publicised ‘turf war’ between Police Scotland and the SPA over division of power at the top of the new service has been resolved. He added:

… Many of the major government issues have been reallocated so that Police Scotland will be in charge of human resources, finance and corporate services… The SPA will do what it was designed to do: utilise governance and accountability by watching the way the service delivers according to the strategy. Until now, the SPA deemed it would be responsible for all support staff, all ICT, be the accountable officers for finance and human resources and so forth.

Holyrood’s justice sub-committee on policing will question SPA chairman Vic Emery and Police Scotland chief constable Sir Stephen House on the SPA resignations. That meeting will take place next Thursday. An SPA spokesman said the papers for the next SPA meeting on Wednesday would include details of the revised ICT strategy.

The SPA further added that the £12 million was only a theoretical figure that existed in a Government document. It says there is ‘no ring-fenced sum’ in its capital budget purely for technology.

Standard
Arts, Books

Book Review: ‘Alone In Berlin’…

AN ACCOUNT OF RESISTANCE

Intro. More than six decades on this account of a couple’s doomed efforts to sabotage the Nazi regime remains powerful testimony.

HANS FALLADA led the kind of life that is measured in shots. Shots of every kind. At the age of 17 Rudolf Ditzen, to give him his birth name, shot one of his closest friends dead in a bizarre suicide pact, staged to look like a duel. As a result he was committed to a psychiatric institution.  This spared him the ordeal of being tried and punished for his offence, but on the downside it ushered in a life increasingly governed by drink, morphine, marital breakdown, mental illness and the Nazis.

In 1944, having already endured two separate stints in prison for petty offences committed in pursuit of his drug habit, Fallada fired a gun at his first wife in a drunken incident. The couple had recently divorced. He was briefly jailed again and spent most of the rest of his life in and out of hospitals until he died of heart failure in February 1947, aged 54. Remarkably, the last 30 months of Fallada’s life yielded some of his most powerful and enduring works, among them Jeder Stirbt Fur Sich Allein (Everyone Dies Alone), first published in 1947, but only now available in English under the title Alone in Berlin.

Despite his formidable demons, Fallada was astonishingly productive. He enjoyed literary acclaim, and a rare spell of mental stability, following the publication of his 1932 novel Little Man, What Now? , which was made into a Hollywood film. But the rise to power of Hitler triggered the first in a series of breakdowns that marked his slow, painful decline.

Alone In Berlin: Hans Fallada has emerged with a novel that remains powerful 60 years after the Resistance to sabotage the Nazi regime. Berlin, 1940, and the city is filled with fear. At the house on 55 Jablonski Strasse, its various occupants try to live under Nazi rule in their different ways.

Alone In Berlin: Hans Fallada has emerged with a novel that remains powerful 60 years after the Resistance to sabotage the Nazi regime. Berlin, 1940, and the city is filled with fear. At the house on 55 Jablonski Strasse, its various occupants try to live under Nazi rule in their different ways.

Fallada’s relationship with the Nazis was complex. Having been branded an “undesirable author” in the early days of the regime, he was later favoured by Joseph Goebbels following his 1937 novel Wolf Among Wolves, for its negative portrayal of the Weimar republic. The following year he made plans to flee the country, aided by his British publisher, George Putnam, but lost his nerve at the crucial moment. Wary of being blacklisted again, or worse still confined to one of the Nazis’ notorious mental institutions, he was forced to bargain with the regime he despised in order to continue publishing.

Crazed killer, alcoholic, morphine addict and Nazi collaborator: Hans Fallada was always going to be a hard sell outside his native country. So it is to Penguin’s credit that it has taken the long overdue step of commissioning this English translation of his final work. It is a necessary step, too, for Fallada invokes an aspect of the Second World War that is in danger of being forgotten: the grinding horror of life in a totalitarian state.

..

ALONE IN BERLIN is the story of a couple, Otto and Anna Quangel, who wage a doomed campaign of resistance against the Nazis. Otto Quangel is a foreman at a furniture factory in Berlin, a man who demands nothing from society beyond a living wage and the freedom to live as he pleases.

At the start of the novel Fallada introduces us not just to the Quangels, but to everyone in their block of flats on Jablonski Strasse: the die-hard Nazi clan, the Jewish widow on the top floor, the petty thieves hanging around the entrance. Fallada expertly weaves the stories of this disparate cast of characters, creating a clever cross-section of a society under siege.

The Quangels are no blameless innocents: they have supported the Nazis in the desperate days of the early thirties, and for many years close their eyes to the atrocities just around the corner. Otto Quangel chooses not to dwell on the sudden disappearances of workers from his factory floor or the pervasive rumours about what happens in the concentration camps. But as the crimes of the state mount up, such silent complicity is unsustainable. The turning point comes in the shape of two events. First, they receive news that their son, Otto, has been killed on the front – on the same day Germany’s triumph over France is announced, prompting an outburst of celebration among their Nazi neighbours. A few days later, their Jewish neighbour, under provocation from the same family, throws herself to her death from her top-floor window.

..

NO LONGER able to ignore the regime’s disregard for human life, the Quangels begin a futile campaign of resistance that leads to their arrest, trial and death. Quangel’s method of subversion is almost pathetic in its lack of impact: every Sunday he writes a handful of postcards denouncing the Nazis and deposits them in stairwells. When he is arrested, he learns that all but 18 of his cards have been handed to the police unread: his two-year crusade has reached, at most, a handful of people. And he pays for it with his life.

There are no tricks or unexpected twists in Alone In Berlin. It reads like a whodunit in reverse, an account of a murderous state clenching its fist around another victim. Fallada’s style is straightforward, often crude (he is said to have written the novel in a “white heat” of 24 days, under failing health), with only the occasional descriptive flourish. The power – and the horror – of the novel is rooted not in the grotesque spectacle of the Holocaust, but in the commonplace brutality that underpinned it.

The Quangels’ situation is hopeless, but Fallada offers them redemption in their refusal to succumb to the Nazis’ dehumanising crusade. It is portrayed as an assertion of the primacy of human life, vindicated by the demise of the regime in the closing chapter. As Anna Quangel puts it, “The main thing … is that we never allow ourselves to be made into them, or start thinking as they do.”

– ALONE IN BERLIN, Hans Fallada [transl. Michael Hofmann], is published by Penguin Classics at £20.

Standard
Biotechnology, Britain, Economic, European Union, Government, Health, Science, Technology

Environment Secretary says GM farming would save the countryside…

The Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson MP, has controversially claimed that GM farming would save the countryside and cost less.

Mr Paterson says that Britain should lead the way in producing genetically-modified food because it would lower prices and free up the countryside.

A long standing advocate of GM technology, Mr Paterson claims its adoption in the UK could be as significant as the agricultural revolution.

He has pointed out that since 1996 there has been a hundred-fold increase in the use of GM crops around the world, with 17 million farmers in 28 countries now growing what critics have branded Frankenstein foods. Less than 0.1 per cent of this takes place in the EU.

According to Mr Paterson farmers wouldn’t grow these crops if they didn’t benefit from doing so. Governments wouldn’t license these technologies, he says, if they didn’t recognise the economic, environmental and public benefits. He also added that consumers wouldn’t buy these products if they didn’t think they were safe and cost-effective.

In a speech designed to appeal to traditionalists, he said that while the rest of the world is ploughing ahead and reaping the benefits of new technologies, Europe risks being left behind.

… The use of GM (technology) could be as transformative as the original agricultural revolution was. The UK should be at the forefront now, as it was then.

Mr Paterson says that GM farming can help feed people in poorer countries and inject missing vitamins into the diets of children in the UK. He also argued that using GM crops to improve yields will require less space, and will free up more greenfield land.

… If we use cultivated land more efficiently, we could free up space for biodiversity, nature and wilderness.

The Environment Secretary also promotes the view that GM crops can help combat the effects of Britain’s increasingly erratic climate.

In recent weeks, the Prime Minister, the Government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Mark Walport, and the Science Minister, David Willetts, have all voiced support for GM crops.

Mr Paterson intends to lead a campaign among European ministers to make Brussels lift many of its restrictions on the use of GM technology.

The Minister of State says that he is conscious of those who need reassurance on this matter. He highlighted the need for government, industry and the scientific community of having a duty to the British public to reassure them that GM is a ‘safe, proven and beneficial innovation.’

But despite the assurances, the Soil Association has warned:

… We need farming that helps poorer African and Asian farmers produce food – not farming that helps (GM producers) Bayer, Syngenta and Monsanto produce profits.

Standard