China, Government, History, Politics, Society

China’s leader told he can rule for life

CHINA

PRESIDENT Xi Jinping has been given the go-ahead to rule China for the rest of his life.

The country’s parliament voted overwhelmingly earlier this week to abolish the 35-year-old law limiting leaders to two consecutive terms in power.

The decision marks a leap back in time, reversing the system of “collective leadership”. And it elevates Mr Xi to the same supreme position enjoyed by Mao Zedong, the dictator who ruled China from 1949 to his death in 1976.

The National People’s Congress backed the constitutional amendment by voting 2,958 in favour – with only two voting against and three abstaining.

Once the parliamentary ballot had been cast, to polite applause, the announcer declared: “The constitutional amendment item has passed.” Mr Xi, who would have had to step down in 2023, showed little emotion. The slide towards one-man rule will fuel concerns about a return to the excesses of autocratic leadership and the possible economic consequences.

Mr Xi’s confident leadership style and tough attitude towards corruption has won him popular support.

Now 64, the unchallenged leader of the world’s most populous nation worked his way up from the poverty of a rural commune. Mr Xi – married to soprano Peng Liyuan, 55, with whom he has one daughter – was appointed leader of the Chinese Communist Party in 2012 and has moved to concentrate power in his own hands. He has appointed himself to bodies that oversee security, finance and economic reform.

Critics fear the lessons of history are being forgotten. Zhang Lifan, a Beijing-based political commentator, said: “This marks the biggest regression in China’s legal system since the reform and opening-up era of the 1980s. I’m afraid that this will all be written into our history in the future.”

In a sign of the issue’s sensitivity, government censors have aggressively cleared social media of expressions ranging from “I disagree” to “Xi Zedong”.

Mr Xi’s control has crushed hopes for reform among China’s embattled liberal scholars and activists, who now fear even greater repression. China allows no political opposition and has relentlessly persecuted groups seeking greater civic participation.

The country’s growing economic power also means world leaders are unlikely to make too much of the developments.

Only last month Theresa May visited China in what was seen as the first step towards a post-Brexit trade deal with the country. Commercial deals worth a total of £9billion were said to have been signed during the trip.

Most powerful man since Mao

The vote makes Xi Jinping China’s most powerful ruler since Mao Zedong.

It also undoes the system of “collective leadership” introduced to avoid a repeat of Chairman Mao’s long and bloody reign.

The founding father of the People’s Republic of China, Mao ruled from when he seized power in 1949 to his death in 1976.

He introduced dramatic and disastrous reforms as he established his own brand of Communism.

The Great Leap Forward – a mass mobilisation of labour to improve production and output – resulted in famine and the deaths of millions.

In 1966 Mao launched the Cultural Revolution to purge the country of opponents. It crippled the economy and thrust China into ten years of turmoil, bloodshed and hunger. It also saw the imprisonment of a huge number of citizens.

His final years saw attempts to build bridges with the US, Japan and Europe, but his reputation could never be restored.

Such was Mao’s devastating impact that in 1982 a law was passed limiting presidents to two terms.

Its reversal will raise fears of a return to the horrors of Mao’s reign.

 

Standard
Arts, Drama, Puzzle

Lateral Thinking Drama: ‘The Lost Idol’

THE LOST STATUE OF MANCO CAPAC

The Lost Idol and Statue of Manco Capac

SAVAGE was late. Raybould sipped the last of his Black Russian. He would give the man five more minutes, then depart. He had better things to do than sit in the bar of Grant’s restaurant waiting for some young chancer who couldn’t read a watch.

Two more minutes passed, then the door from the street opened and a man with close-cropped, almost white hair and striking, pale blue eyes emerged into the foyer. He looked around, a faint smile playing over his lips. Raybould recognised Mark Savage at once from the photograph he had sent. He raised a hand to draw his attention.

“Mr Raybould?”

“Mr Savage. You know you are over an hour late?”

“I’m sorry.” The man had a surprisingly deep, mellifluous voice. “I was researching in the library and lost track of time.”

“I trust you have no objection to dining straight away?”

“Of course not.”

Raybould stood. He nodded to the waiter who had appeared discreetly at the door to the restaurant. “Evening, Andre.”

“Good evening, Monsieur Raybould. Your usual table is ready for you.”

Grant’s restaurant was large and genuinely old, with low ceilings and thick oak beams. As well as the main dining area, which was about half-full, there were several smaller rooms leading off. Raybould’s table was in an alcove in one of these. Privacy was guaranteed by thick drapes on three sides, and a curtain that could be pulled on the fourth.

Andre handed them two leather-bound menus. “An aperitif, Monsieur Raybould?”

“Have you any more of that excellent sherry – the Amontillado?”

“Bien sûr, monsieur. And for your guest?”

“Whatever,” Savage said airily. Raybould frowned. Clearly this man had little appreciation of the finer things. Still, no doubt he had more pressing concerns. Well, no time like the present, he thought.

“So, Mr Savage, perhaps you’d like to explain your proposition, and how it may be worth five million pounds to me.”

“Certainly.” Savage looked relieved to be getting down to business. “Three years ago, I was on a trekking holiday in Peru. A friend had told me about the Inca Trail, and I decided I must see it for myself. The trail follows the ancient road that originally linked Cuzco and Machu Picchu, the mysterious ruined city of the Incas.”

Continue reading

Standard
Arts, Australia, Books, Britain, History, Maritime

Book Review: The Bounty Mutiny & The Founding of Australia

PARADISE IN CHAINS

Mutinous Mary’s miracle on the high seas follows that of Captain Bligh who survived one of history’s most perilous voyages, a Cornish woman transported Down Under was inspired to do the same.

MOST of us know the story of Captain Bligh and the mutiny on HMS Bounty from the Hollywood movies, variously starring Charles Laughton, Trevor Howard and Anthony Hopkins, through which Bligh became a byword for shipboard tyranny.

In contrast, few have heard of the female convict Mary Bryant, transported Down Under in 1787. But, as Diana Preston’s vivid, continuously compelling book reveals, there are intriguing links between Bligh and Bryant.

Preston’s revisiting of the mutiny is rich in detail. Bligh’s orders were to sail to the Pacific island of Tahiti, gather breadfruit seedlings and take them to the West Indies to grow food for plantation slaves.

His troubles began when he arrived in Tahiti, that “fabled paradise of plenty and pleasure”.

European visitors had, from the time of the island’s discovery, been both delighted and scandalised by what they found there, and sex-starved sailors had rejoiced in what seemed like Tahitian free love.

The Bounty’s men were no different, and they were unsurprisingly reluctant to leave at the end of their five-month layover, but Bligh hauled them back to the ship.

Once they had left Tahiti, relationships on board the Bounty rapidly deteriorated. Bligh’s outbursts of temper and foulmouthed ranting undermined the men’s already low morale.

 

PARTICULARLY distressed by what he saw as his unfair treatment was Master’s Mate Fletcher Christian who, within weeks, could take it no longer.

On April 28, 1789, he and fellow mutineers took over the ship. “You have treated me like a dog all voyage,” he told Bligh. “I am determined to suffer it no longer.”

Bligh and 18 men loyal to him were ordered into an open boat 23ft long and 6ft 9in at its widest – and left to the mercies of the sea.

What followed was more extraordinary than the mutiny itself. Bligh decided to head for Timor, 3,600 miles away in the Dutch East Indies. All the men agreed to a daily ration of one ounce of bread and a quarter-pint of water, which Bligh measured out using scales and weights improvised from two coconut shells and pistol balls (which can still be seen in the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, London).

Unsurprisingly, these rations caused pains in the lower bowels and constipation. “Most of us 18 days without an evacuation,” noted Bligh in his sea journal.

Despite the hardships, Bligh successfully navigated his tiny boat to its destination. Six weeks later, it arrived in the Dutch harbour of Kupang and Bligh hoisted a Union Jack he had fashioned from signal flags. All but one man had survived.

In Britain two years earlier, as the Bounty was setting sail in search of breadfruit, the first plans for criminals to be exiled Down Under were drawn up.

When the First Fleet of 11 ships sailed from Portsmouth for New South Wales, there were more than 700 convicts on board. The oldest was an 82-year-old rag-and-bone woman convicted of perjury; the youngest was nine-year-old John Hudson, whose chimney-sweep master had pushed him through the skylight of a house to steal from it.

Maid Elizabeth Beckford had taken several pounds of Gloucester cheese from her mistress’s larder. Thomas Chaddick had appropriated 12 cucumbers from a kitchen garden.

Compared to these petty thieves, Mary Broad was a major criminal. She had been a highway robber and was sentenced to death, but this was commuted to transportation.

By the time she set off for New South Wales, Mary was pregnant – probably by one of her guards. During the voyage, she gave birth to a girl and took up with William Bryant, a fisherman convicted of smuggling. They married once they arrived in what was then called New Holland.

Conditions in the new colony were hellish. Deprivation and disease were everywhere, and punishments were severe.

William Bryant and his wife seem to have decided that anything was preferable to remaining in New Holland. They may well have heard of Bligh’s extraordinary journey from a passing Dutch ship captain and were inspired to steal a boat.

Together with their children (they now had two) and seven other convicts, they made their bid for freedom. Heading like Bligh to the Dutch East Indies, they travelled 3,254 nautical miles along Australia’s eastern seaboard, westward through the feared Torres Strait and across the largely uncharted Arafura Sea. Whenever they ventured on shore, they were threatened by hostile natives. They faced seas “running mountains high” and lived in dread “that our boat would be staved to pieces and every soul perish”.

 

SIXTY-NINE days later, they arrived in Kupang, where they claimed to be the survivors of a shipwrecked whaler. Their true story eventually emerged and they were taken back to Britain, coincidentally on board the same ship as some of the Bounty mutineers who had been captured while enjoying more sex and sunshine in Tahiti.

Both the open-boat voyage made by Bligh and his men and the one by Mary Bryant and her companions rank among the most remarkable in maritime history.

Bligh’s subsequent career included service under Lord Nelson and a spell as Governor of New South Wales, during which he faced another mutiny.

Mary Bryant’s case was taken up by distinguished men, including Dr Johnson’s biographer James Boswell. She was given a free pardon in 1793 and returned to her native Cornwall, where she is assumed to have died some time before the end of the century.

In telling these tales in parallel, Preston provides a fresh perspective on both the endlessly fascinating saga of the Bounty and the early history of Australia.

– ‘Paradise In Chains: The Bounty Mutiny and The Founding of Australia’ by Diana Preston is published by Bloomsbury for £25

Standard