Biotechnology, Government, Health, Medical, Science, Society

Genomic medicine is being blocked by the NHS

NHS: GENOMIC MEDICINE

THIS MONTH the NHS will become the first health service in the world to offer whole genome sequencing to patients where clinically appropriate. Heralded by NHS leaders as “a new era of genomic health”, the goal is to use these data and new technologies to decode and treat previously intractable diseases, to move away from symptomatic treatments to cures and prevention.

The Prime Minister has said she wants the UK to lead the world in this new area of science – to continue a tradition of innovation in this country that will “extend horizons and transform lives”.

Theresa May’s ambition to lead the world in genomics and precision medicines is one that we should all want to support. Scientists and doctors know that pioneering precision medicines and their advances change lives, but they will also be aware of the challenges that must be overcome to realise its potential. This is not necessarily because the science is lacking, but because a fundamental shift in thinking is still needed by governments, regulators and policymakers in how they assess the value of this innovation.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an excellent example of this challenge. In 1989, when the cystic fibrosis gene was first identified, scientists did not know how mutations in the gene caused the condition. There was nothing to treat the underlying cause of the disease and people could only seek treatment for their symptoms.

After nearly 20 years of research and development by hundreds of scientists, and the design, synthesis and testing of more than 400,000 unique molecules, they have now done what was once thought impossible – discovered and brought to nearly half of all CF patients the first medicines to treat the underlying cause of this devastating disease. Today, multiple medicines approved by the EU and U.S. now exist, and there are more coming down the line. The ultimate goal is to cure CF once and for all.

For this remarkable cycle of innovation to be completed, Governments must now play their part, by providing patients with access to these medicines. Three years after approval of these medicines, this has still not happened because scientific innovation is outpacing the UK medicines evaluation system.

The evaluation criteria and processes used by the NHS and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are currently preventing them from being made available to patients. Despite universal acceptance of the benefits that these medicines will bring, people in the UK have been waiting for access for more than 1,000 days, while thousands of people with CF in other countries in Europe and the US have been benefiting from them for years.

CF patients don’t really have the time to wait. Half of those with this cruel disease will die before they are 31. Science has delivered the breakthroughs, but the system is blocking access. The UK has the second largest number of CF patients in the world.

In 2016, the UK’s own chief medical officer recommended a fundamental shift in how new transformative medicines are developed and appraised for use in healthcare systems. The appraisal system in the UK needs to reflect that the genes and pathways underlying genetic diseases seldom respond to traditional pharmaceutical approaches, and so precision medicine requires risk-taking innovation.

The Life Sciences Industrial Strategy, a report made to the Government just last year, echoes many of these sentiments. It outlines the need for industry to take on bold, far-sighted ambitions in the life sciences with the intention of creating commercial success, underpinned by novel technology and higher-risk science. The strategy singles out a handful of successful biotech companies with highly innovative products. Yet, unlike in many other European countries, the NHS and NICE have not yet followed these recommendations and evolved their evaluation criteria for these types of transformative precision medicines.

The Government must surely need to act, not just for more than 10,000 people currently living with CF in the UK, but also for people suffering from many other kinds of genetic diseases.

Genomic medicine stands on the cusp of becoming an everyday reality. Those institutions at the cutting edge of gene therapy and gene editing need a system that is already thinking about the innovations of tomorrow. Such systems need to incentivise innovators to get medicines into the hands of patients as soon as possible.

Organisations involved in scientific advances will never give up on their ambition to cure serious diseases that today might still seem impossible to tackle. While they continue to deliver on the science, the UK Government must show its commitment to biomedical innovation if the genomic revolution is to be fully realised.

Standard
Biotechnology, Britain, Environment, European Union, Government, Research, Science, Society

Pesticides require to be cut to save bees…

COLONY COLLAPSE DISORDER

Bees are an essential part of our life-cycle. Without them, flowers would not be pollinated and crops would fail. And as the world’s human population continues to grow, bee numbers in recent times have been falling, indicating that there is a big problem looming. Scientists are concerned.

Biologists and environmentalists have been puzzling about the cause for some time. Of particular concern is what has become known as colony collapse disorder, an affliction that has already led to the death of entire hives of bees during the winter months. The collapse of colonies is something which has been happening with frequent occurrence. The finger of suspicion is now pointing ever more firmly at insecticides and aggressive agricultural practices, especially those chemicals containing compounds known as neonicotinoids.

These are recently developed pesticides that have become widely used in agriculture because they are much less toxic to humans and other animals than the chemicals they replaced.

Evidence is mounting, though, that they are highly toxic to bees. A scientific study has found that hives that had similar levels of mite and parasite infestation, also thought to be a factor in colony collapse, were much more likely to die if the bees had also been exposed to neonicotinoid pesticides.

Empirically, several studies have now borne out this effect, with researchers edging closer in identifying the casual mechanism – that neonicotinoids are responsible for disrupting the immune and neurological systems of bees. This makes them less resistant to disease caused by parasites.

European and British regulators have already moved to restrict the use of neonicotinoids, but the case for a much tougher clampdown to reverse the loss of honey bees is gaining traction.

 

Standard
Biotechnology, Health, Medical, Research, Science

Cell transplant gives hope for treating blindness…

A MAJOR ADVANCE

Scientists in Britain have made a major leap forward in efforts to treat blindness.

They have grown part of an eye in the laboratory and have extracted the light-sensitive cells which are the key to vision.

These cells were injected into mice, where they seemed to grow normally and formed the crucial connections between the eye and brain.

Such developments could pave the way for a treatment which could eventually give millions back their sight. It is hoped the first human patients could be treated in as little as five years. Transplanting just a small number of cells could have a big impact on quality of life.

Those who could benefit include men and women with age-related macular degeneration – the most common cause of blindness in the elderly. This condition affects more than 600,000 Britons and the number is expected to triple in the next 25 years as the elderly population swells.

There are few treatments for the condition – and no cure.

The research and experimentation is being carried out at University College London in which scientists are trying to replace damaged cells in the retina, the light sensitive ‘film’ at the back of the eye.

Last year, researchers used healthy cells from young mice to restore vision in adult animals. The results were said to be ‘dramatic’, with the treated animals able to quickly find their way out of a miniature swimming pool in dim light, while untreated ones swam around in circles.

Stem Cell Therapy for Blindness

The project’s lead-scientist, Professor Robin Ali, said the results amount to a ‘major advance’. His team took embryonic stem cells – ‘master cells’ capable of turning into other cell types and widely touted as a repair kit for the body – and used a cocktail of nutrients to coax them into turning into a retina.

They then raided the laboratory-grown retina for rods (key cells which pick up light and send it to the brain for conversion into images). The rods were then transplanted into the eyes of mice.

A retina has been grown in a dish before but Professor Ali’s team are the first to transplant cells from one successfully.

The journal Nature Biotechnology was the first to report the findings and has said that the lab-grown cells integrated into the existing eye was successful in forming the nerve connections needed to send information to the brain.

Professor Ali said:

… We are getting closer and closer to carrying out a trial.

However, the need to be highly confident that the treatment is safe and effective means that widespread use is at least 10-15 years away.

The Medical Research Council, which funded the team’s work, said in a statement:

… This study is an important milestone on the road to developing a widely available cell therapy for blindness.

Standard