Education, Politics, United States

The US administration’s attack on universities is an affront to democracy

AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES

IN the authoritarian playbook, enfeebling universities is an early move in the state seizing control. It has been studied eagerly by the likes of Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Authoritarians and one-party states centrally target universities with the aim of restricting dissent. There are instances now, too, where scholars of influential universities in America, such as Yale, are leaving the US for other countries such as Canada because of the political climate and the battle that is escalating over higher education.

It is not merely because universities are often bastions of liberal attitudes and hotbeds for protest. They also constitute one of the critical institutions of civil society; they are a bulwark of democracy. The Trump administration is taking on judges, lawyers, NGOs, and the media: it would be highly surprising if universities were not on the list. They embody the importance of knowledge, rationality, and independent thought.

The evidence is now clear to see. In a typically brazen move, Donald Trump has accused Harvard of being a threat to democracy, and has become one of his administration’s top targets. The US government is attacking diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, and says it is tackling the failure of universities to root out antisemitism – a claim that is widely challenged. While most Trump supporters are unlikely to take issue with cutting billions of dollars of public spending on wealthy elite institutions, it has to be recognised that much of that money goes to scientific and medical research that enriches the US as a nation and benefits vast numbers of people who have never ventured near an Ivy League university.

The administration’s shocking demands of Harvard include federal oversight of admissions, the dismantling of diversity programmes, the curtailment to recruitment of international students “hostile to American values”, and the compelled hiring of “viewpoint diverse” staff.

Harvard has commendably chosen to fight back. Its president, Alan Garber, insists the university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. It is suing the government over the freeze on $2.2bn in federal funding, part of a threat to withhold $9bn. That is encouraging others to speak out. More than 150 university presidents have signed a joint letter denouncing “unprecedented government overreach and political interference”.

Many have pointed out that the world’s richest university can afford to stand firm thanks to its unrivalled $53bn endowment and sympathetic billionaire alumni. Nonetheless, that same prestige and power is what has made it the primary target: force it to fold, and weaker institutions will follow. It’s worth noting that Harvard toughened its position after faculty, students, and alumni pushed hard for it to do so, warning that concessions would only encourage the administration. Columbia acquiesced to an extraordinary list of demands but some $400m of withheld funding has yet to be restored, and the administration is reportedly seeking to extend control over the university.

Troubling, because whatever comes of Harvard’s lawsuit, this is an administration that has already chosen to ignore court rulings. It may step up its assault, by revoking charitable status and clamping down on international students. Still, Harvard is fighting back not just because it can, but because it must. In doing so, it is defending not only academic freedom, but democracy more broadly. It will inspire others to do the same.

Standard
Arts, Books, Education

Book Club: ‘Re-Educated’ by Lucy Kellaway

SYNOPSIS

IF YOU’VE come to a certain point in your life where you realise something is missing, then this dazzling, life-affirming book is for you.

Lucy was a celebrated columnist and frequent broadcaster, when at 57 – and to all appearances happy and successful – she decided she wanted something else.

With four grown-up children she gave up her job, her marriage, and a six-figure salary to retrain as a maths teacher in a tough inner-city comprehensive. And, on the way, she co-founded the educational charity Now Teach for those wishing to change career.

Many did. This wonderful, at times funny book, is a celebration of the power of education, as well as the ability of any of us to transform our lives and start out again.

It also proves that if you are well-off, well-educated, well-connected and middle class you can do more or less anything you set your mind to.

– Re-Educated is a beautifully told story of courage, determination and magnificent human resilience. It is bracing, inspirational and life affirming. Published by Ebury, 256pp
Standard
Education, Information, Science, Society, Technology

Information Society: Probability and Statistics

INFORMATION AGE

WE live in an information age in which modern technology makes it easy to gather large amounts of information on almost every aspect of our lives. However, on its own this information is of only limited value – it needs to be organised and analysed to be of practical use.

 

INFORMATION about population numbers have been collected since ancient times (see Appendage), but the science of analysing and making sense of data – statistics – is relatively recent. Although now not usually considered to be a branch of mathematics, statistics relies on mathematical analysis to interpret information and is closely linked to the area of mathematics known as probability theory.

Chance and probability

The beginnings of probability theory came from the fascination that two 17th-century French mathematicians had with games of chance. Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat discussed, in a series of letters, a method of calculating the chances of success in gambling games, and they were the first to give the subject of probability a scientific treatment.

What they discussed was a mathematical way of determining the probability of a particular outcome occurring in a random event, such as tossing a coin or throwing a dice. When a coin is tossed there are two possibilities: heads or tails. Each is equally likely: there is one chance in two that the coin will come up heads (or tails), or in other words the probability is 1/2. The six faces of a dice give one chance in six of throwing any particular number, a probability of 1/6. In games using more than one dice, or a deck of cards, or a roulette wheel, the calculation becomes more complex but is essentially built from basic principles and is the same. From this discussion of gambling games, a theory of probability evolved.

The idea was further developed by the next generation of mathematicians. French mathematician Abraham de Moivre discovered a pattern to the probability of outcomes, now known as normal distribution and represented graphically as the bell curve.

Bell Curve

[Bell Curve: Normal distribution] – When certain values (such as height) are plotted against the number of occurrences of that value (how many people are of a specific height), the result is often a bell-shaped curve – the normal distribution. The most common value, at the peak, is the mean (average).

British mathematician and clergyman Thomas Bayes took de Moivre’s ideas further with his theorem of conditional probabilities, which makes it possible to calculate the probability of a particular event occurring when that event is conditional on other factors and the probabilities of those factors are known. Bayes’ work was further developed by Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French mathematician and astronomer whose application of Bayes’ theorem to real cases led to a new field of study: statistics.

Detecting patterns

The pioneering work in statistics was done by de Moivre, who used data about death rates and rates of interest to devise a theory of annuities, which enabled insurance companies to compile tables of risk for life assurance based on scientific principles. This application of mathematics to data in records was at first known as “political arithmetic”, and, as patterns emerged in collections of data, research began into their underlying statistical laws. To begin with, statistics was concerned with social issues, and advances in sociology and criminology were made by the Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet, who introduced the concept of the “average man”. He also believed mathematics lay at the heart of every science, and statistical analysis could be applied to data of all kinds. Perhaps the area where this had greatest effect was medicine, where an important new study, epidemiology (occurrence of disease in populations), developed from medical statistics.

As more practical use was made of probability theory and statistics, the mathematics behind them was developed by various mathematicians, including the Frenchman Adrien-Marie Legendre, the German Carl Friedrich Gauss, and the Russian Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, whose systematic approach to the subject forms the basis for much of modern probability theory.

Modern statistics

Statistics plays a key role in much of modern life. Governments collect and analyse a wide range of personal data to detect patterns that can help shape policies. Businesses use market research to gather information about potential customers and apply statistical methods to analyse the data. In science, statistics and probability are central to subjects such as quantum theory and are also essential to many other subjects, from psychology and economics to information science.

Data Samples

In practice, the data used for statistical analysis must be sound for it to produce useful results. The data must be collected using a valid method that measures what is intended, and the data must be accurate. It is also essential that the set of data is large enough and constitutes a representative sample. For example, in general public opinion polls the right questions must be asked in an unambiguous, neutral way; sufficient numbers of people must be polled; and, as a whole, the respondents must be representative of the population (for instance, in age and gender).

Applications

Coxcomb2

Florence Nightingale’s “coxcomb” graph – This graph devised by Florence Nightingale shows the relative causes of death among soldiers in one 12-month period during the Crimean War (1854-56).

. Coxcomb graphs – Working as a nurse for British troops during the Crimean War, Florence Nightingale kept records of troop deaths and later used the information to create what are now called “coxcomb” graphs. These highlighted the number of deaths that were not directly caused by combat but by factors such as wound infection and disease.

. Computerised Modelling – The development of probability and statistics gave scientists new ways to analyse and conceptualise the physical world.

Many natural systems are influenced by numerous factors and exhibit chaotic behaviour. For example, influences on the weather include air, land, and sea temperatures, winds, sea currents, humidity, and the amount of sunlight. Minute changes in any one of these factors can have a profound effect on the weather. Because of this, weather forecasting relies on numerical models in which statistical methods are used to arrive at predictions that have various degrees of probability of being correct.

. Quantum Theory – The currently accepted theory of the nature and behaviour of matter at the subatomic level, quantum theory uses probability as one of its fundamental tenets. For example, according to quantum theory it is impossible to know precisely the location and momentum of subatomic particles such as electrons “orbiting” the nucleus of an atom; it is only possible to specify regions – known as clouds – where particles may be located with the highest probability.

Appendage –

Early Censuses

The earliest known census dates from ancient Babylonian times, about 3800 BCE, and recorded the human population and agricultural data.

Many of the other ancient civilisations also regularly recorded population numbers, often for the purposes of taxation. In the Middle Ages, probably the best-known census is the Domesday Book, which was instigated by William I of England in 1086 to tax the recently conquered population. These early censuses were simply records of numbers because mathematical techniques for analysing data had not yet been developed.

Standard