Arts, Books, Britain, History, Military, Photography

Book Review: Birth of the RAF (& Gallery)

(LONG-READ COMPOSITION)

THE order to ‘Scramble’ had finally come and the ever-eager Squadron Leader Douglas Bader led his team of Spitfires and Hurricanes in a fast ascent into the sky over southern England.

It was September 1940, the height of the Battle of Britain. In the distance, a cluster of black dots scattered across the sky.

Over the radio came the cry: ‘Bandits, 10 o’clock!’ There were 70 of them, Dornier bombers and their fighter plane escorts. Bader closed fast, ignoring the streams of tracer streaking at him from their rear gunners.

. See also Britain: ‘RAF and the ‘Battle of the Beams’…

A Messerschmitt floated into his sights. He gave a quick burst of fire and felt a moment of triumph and relief as he saw it fall, smoke pouring from its tail.

Relief turned to fear as there then followed a horrible, jarring shock as German cannon shells slammed into his own plane. Instinctively, he banked hard left as his cockpit filled with smoke. He was going down in flames.

Gripped by the inevitable, he pulled back the hood to bale out – until the slipstream cleared the smoke and he realised the fire had miraculously gone out. He was all right after all.

Using all his strength and skill, he eased the Hurricane out of its screaming dive and gave chase to another Messerschmitt, firing three sharp bursts.

It veered groundward and seconds later exploded. But Bader was in real trouble now too, his aircraft crabbing awkwardly, left wing dropping, holes in the cockpit and the side of the airframe.

His flying-suit was gashed across the right hip. Somehow, he nursed the Hurricane back to base, landed, taxied to the maintenance hangar and climbed out, barking: ‘I want this aircraft ready again in half an hour!’

Here was the raw, do-or-die courage, the refusal to be beaten, that came to typify Britain’s Royal Air Force. The service is now set to celebrate 100 years since it was founded on April 1, 1918.

The formation of the RAF had a difficult birth. Conceived in panic against the wishes of the other armed forces, the RAF was sniped at from all sides and only just managed to survive as an independent organisation. It was a good job it did.

It nurtured the likes of the indomitable Bader (who’d lost both his legs in a pre-war crash when showing off his aerobatic skills), without whom the Battle of Britain, its finest hour, would not have been won. It has proved its worth ever since.

Spitfires Oil Painting

Oil Painting: ‘Spitfires’

 

IN a new book by historian Richard Overy, it comes as a surprise to learn that getting the RAF off the ground took herculean effort – and very nearly didn’t happen.

Britain had war planes in service ever since the start of World War I, with their importance in battle growing even though flying then was still rudimentary and dangerous.

Flimsy planes made of wood and fabric and held together with wire were liable to break up or crash.

Pilots took to the air in combat after just a dozen hours training, wrapped up in layers of clothing and multiple balaclavas to keep out the cold in the open cockpits. There were no parachutes.

Continue reading

Standard
Britain, Defence, Government, Military

Defence to get billions more to help tackle terror threats

DEFENCE

THE Armed Forces are to be handed billion of pounds to tackle threats from terrorists and hostile states such as Russia.

The Prime Minister has said that the Government would do better on defence in the future to ensure the capabilities meet the changing threats facing the UK.

Details of the promise of billions in the next autumn Budget to Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson came after Theresa May announced a cash injection of £800million to the Ministry of Defence.

The Treasury will release £600million from a contingency fund in the next financial year so it can go towards building a new class of submarines to carry the UK’s nuclear deterrent. This will free up money for operations and training, areas which would have been cut otherwise.

A further £200million will be made available to move forward certain projects this year, which in turn will give the department more room to spend money on other schemes next year.

Mr Williamson said that this is a welcome boost to our Armed Forces, ensuring that the country can be defended and in protecting our national interests with the ultimate capability. The Defence Secretary said that in an increasingly dangerous world we must strengthen our ability to counter the intensifying and evolving threats we face to keep Britain safe.

In the Commons, Mrs May said: “Today’s announcement will ensure the work to rebuild the UK’s new world-class submarines remains on schedule and is another sign of the deep commitment this Government has to keeping our country safe.”

The MoD is carrying out a defence review to examine which areas of the department need more money after dire warnings about the present state of the Armed Forces.

The Modernising Defence Programme comes after a wider Strategic Defence and Security Review in 2015.

The mini review will be published this summer and is expected to say that the MoD needs greater investment in more modern capabilities – and extra resources.

 

SOME within the military are calling the £600million boost for the Ministry of Defence a “minor miracle”.

The Prime Minister said the money would come from underspends elsewhere, adding that the work to rebuild the new nuclear deterrent remains on course.

With an increasingly belligerent Russia sending nuclear-capable bombers towards our airspace, and with their submarines haunting sea approaches to Faslane, this is surely a time for vigilance and internal unity.

Standard
Britain, Government, Military

The UK’s military capability is being drained by overseas aid

DEFENCE

BRITAIN’S military must stop being used as a ‘cash cow’ for overseas aid missions, the ex-armed forces minister has said.

Sir Mike Penning warns operations such as the Royal Navy’s task of rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean are ‘draining military capabilities’.

The senior Conservative says the Ministry of Defence must stop being seen as a ‘soft option’, warning that the backbone of the UK’s operational defence capability is being ‘stripped out’.

Sir Mike, who served eight years as a Grenadier Guard, says the cash for the Trident nuclear deterrent should be removed from the defence budget to free up more cash. ‘The MoD has got to stop being a soft option. It needs to spend what it has wisely and stand up to those who see it as a cash cow,’ he said.

The defence budget for 2016-17 was £35billion – of which around £2billion was earmarked for the annual operating costs of Trident.

Sir Mike warns that if the costs of the nuclear deterrent were not taken out of the budget then the MoD would be forced to cut more warships and troops.

‘The core and backbone of our operational defence capability are being stripped out at a time when our enemies are testing us every day’. He also says that the Department for International Development (Dfid) should shoulder the cost of more missions.

Sir Mike Penning, a former soldier who served eight years as a Grenadier Guard, said the cash for the Trident nuclear deterrent should be removed from the defence budget to free up more cash.

Britain should be proud of its commitment to aid spending, ‘but not if the cost is adversely affecting our military capability’. Sir Mike adds: ‘The question to be asked is why it should be our ships and troops being used when there are other ways to help.’

The Navy has been providing ships to rescue migrants and destroy smuggling boats in the Mediterranean since 2015.

Sir Mike says the aid ministry should be using its funds to lease other ships so naval assets could be freed up for other tasks. Emphasising the point that Royal Navy ships have helped to rescue thousands from the sea, he simply asks whether that is the best use of naval resources, and asks: ‘Why can’t we use some of the 0.7 per cent we have committed to international aid to lease ships that are much more suitable for the job?’

This would ‘free up the Royal Navy to do what they are trained and equipped to do – namely protect us… We should be using the Department for International Development cash where it is needed, not draining our military capabilities.’

A spokesperson for Dfid said: ‘Dfid works closely with the MoD to increase security overseas, and both departments want to use both the aid and defence budgets in the wisest way to boost our global influence and make the UK safer.

‘The International Development Secretary has had a series of meetings to see how the two departments can better achieve their aims.’

 

TRUE, with defence spending pared to the bone, former Armed Forces minister Sir Mike Penning asks a pertinent question. Why, he wonders, are we diverting warships from defending us to the job of rescuing migrants from the Mediterranean? There should be enough cash in our bloated foreign aid budget to lease far more suitable vessels for this task. Equally, we should ask what has happened to properly joined-up government?

 

Standard