Category Archives: National Security

Britain, Intelligence, National Security, United States

Britain’s Spy watchdog rules on GCHQ eavesdropping…

INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY COMMITTEE

The Westminster Parliament’s spy watchdog has called for an investigation into Britain’s laws on intelligence eavesdropping as it cleared GCHQ of flouting the existing rules.

The Intelligence and Security Committee ruled on Wednesday that the listening station in Cheltenham acted with ministerial backing when it requested electronic intercepts from the US National Security Agency’s PRISM programme.

But the committee has raised questions about whether there is a need for new laws.

GCHQ has faced criticism after NSA whistleblower and US fugitive Edward Snowden claimed that British intelligence used PRISM by circumventing British laws.

The committee said the claims were ‘unfounded’ and that in each case where GCHQ sought information from the US, an intercept warrant signed by a minister was already in place. Crucially, however, it has not yet investigated what happened when the NSA handed over unsolicited intelligence.

And, in dealing with only the ‘content of private communications’, the committee has not examined the vast majority of the intelligence generated by PRISM – data which reveals who sends emails and other messages, to whom they send them, at what time and from where.

The watchdog suggested that the ‘law has not caught up with technology’ that allows the listening post to tap millions of emails.

Standard
Britain, Foreign Affairs, Government, Military, National Security, Syria, United States

Arming the Syrian rebels is looking less likely…

SYRIAN REBELS

Downing Street has ditched plans to arm the Syrian rebels after the Prime Minister has been warned that there is little point sending weapons unless he is prepared for all-out war with the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

General Sir David Richards, Chief of the Defence Staff, along with other commanders believe that sending small arms or ground-to-air missiles will hardly be worth it, since it would it would make little difference to the outcome of the conflict. Military chiefs have also said that even options like a no-fly zone (NFZ) would require air attacks on Syrian defences that would last weeks or even months.

The assassination last week of Kamal Hamami, a top commander of the Syrian Free Army, by a hardline group linked to Al-Qaeda, has compounded anxieties over plans by Britain and other Western countries to give military help to rebels fighting the Assad regime. Those fears are aggravated by the possibility that weapons and expertise provided to the rebels could be turned against the UK and her allies by radical Islamists. There are also growing rivalries between the Syrian Free Army and Islamists, who have sometimes joined forces on the battlefield.

But senior ministers and Whitehall officials have revealed that the Coalition is drawing up plans to help train and advise ‘moderate’ elements of the opposition forces who continue to battle with Assad’s forces.

The British Prime Minister has been keen to act on Syria and demanded last month an end to the EU arms embargo on the country to give him options. The EU reluctantly relented, but sending weapons to the beleaguered rebels in Syria remains an option open to the prime minister if parliament was to approve, though that does seem a remote possibility at the present moment given the lack of support among Tory whips.

Following a meeting of the National Security Council, in which British military commanders were asked to present options on the conflict, the Government was told that although it might make them feel better (by sending weapons) it was hardly worth it in terms of altering the balance of forces on the ground. Whilst Syria is known to have good air defences, military chiefs have also said that engaging Syria militarily would mean weeks of bombing and air strikes. A decision to engage is one that couldn’t be undertaken half-heartedly.

But given the lack of organisation within the rebel movement, training and advising the rebels remain district possibilities for Britain. The UK is concentrating on areas where it feels it has the expertise to contribute. The supply of weapons into Syria is continuing to be made by Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

It is understood that military advisers could be stationed in Jordon to advise Syria rebel leaders on strategy and tactics. UK chiefs are wary of being accused of having British boots on the ground in Syria or by making any ground incursion into the country.

Ministers believe it could take 18 months of further conflict before Assad is forced to the negotiating table. The civil war has already claimed more than 100,000 lives with millions more displaced on the borders with neighbouring countries.

There is also frustration about the approach taken by US Secretary of State John Kerry in pushing regime figures to the negotiating table. There is little idea of the solution Mr Kerry is seeking. Knowing where you are trying to get to in order to get there should surely be central in any negotiations over Syria, but this underpinning remains distinctly absent even after almost three years of intense fighting.

Standard
European Union, Government, Intelligence, National Security, United States

U.S. spying report on EU offices has angered European officials…

A report by the U.S. National Security Agency that suggests it spied on EU offices has infuriated European officials.

The European Union has warned that if the report is accurate it will have tremendous and wide reaching repercussions. Martin Schulz, the President of the European Parliament, said he was deeply worried and shocked about the allegations and has stressed that if the allegations prove to be true it would have a severe impact on EU-US relations. Acting on behalf of the European Parliament, Mr Schulz has demanded full clarification and is seeking further information from the U.S. authorities on these allegations.

Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, the German Justice Minister, said that if the accusations were true that would be reminiscent of the Cold War. The German minister has also asked for an immediate explanation from the United States.

Citing information from secret documents obtained by former NSA employee Edward Snowden, the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel reported that several U.S. spying operations targeted EU leaders.

Der Spiegel says the documents from Snowden describe how the National Security Agency bugged EU officials’ Washington and New York offices and conducted an ‘electronic eavesdropping operation’ that tapped into an EU building in Brussels.

Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for strategic operations in the White House, said he had not seen the report and would not comment on unauthorised disclosures of intelligence programs. Mr Rhodes did say, though, that the United States does work very closely with its European partners and has very close intelligence relationships with Europe.

Michael Hayden, a former director of the CIA and NSA, whilst having been out of government for some five years, said he didn’t know whether the report was true. Mr Hayden was clear, however, on a number of points confirming that the United States does conduct espionage and, that in relation to the US’s Fourth Amendment, which protects the privacy of Americans, does not amount to an international treaty. The former CIA director was also reticent about Europeans looking first to what their own governments are doing in respect to international espionage.

Der Spiegel’s report comes at a particularly sensitive time. The first round of negotiations for a trans-Atlantic trade agreement between the United States and the European Union are set to start next month in Washington.

Standard