History, Philosophy

Philosophy: Rene Descartes

DESCARTES’ DISCOURSE

IN 1637 RENE Descartes published his discourse (Discours de la Methode). In this he established the principle that metaphysical demonstrations should be based on mathematical certainty, not on scholastic subtleties. Descartes argued that the proper way to reason is to doubt everything systematically until only the clear and simple ideas that are beyond doubt are left. Then you have arrived at the truth. This method of thinking became known as the ‘Cartesian’ method.

Descartes wanted to be able to doubt everything, but he vehemently affirmed his certainty in his own existence: I think, therefore I am. Whatever else the sceptic may doubt, he should not doubt his own existence. The saying entails believing that mind is more real than matter. This idea was not entirely new: St Augustine said something similar but did not give it the emphasis that Descartes did. He also adopted as a general rule that all things that we conceive very clearly and very distinctly are true.

Descartes’ view of the world was rigidly deterministic. Dead matter and living matter are equally governed by the laws of physics, so there is no need to follow Aristotle in thinking in terms of a soul, or some equivalent to a soul, to explain the growth of organisms. This got Descartes, a devout Christian, into some difficulties. If all organisms, people included, were simply following predetermined laws of physics, how could free will exist? The Bible taught him that people did have free will, and that making the wrong choice resulted in the exclusion from Eden. In the end, Descartes was unable to resolve a fundamental problem in his philosophical system, because he had one foot in the scholasticism of the middle ages and one foot in contemporary science. If he had been able to leave his religion behind, he could have achieved philosophical consistency, and planted both feet in the modern world. Descartes’ philosophy is all the more interesting because it stands on the division between two mindsets. It stands at a particular moment in human history, a particular threshold.

Descartes is generally regarded as the founder of modern philosophy. He was the first man of high philosophical capacity to be affected by the new physics and the new astronomy. He was bold in not accepting foundations that had been laid down by earlier philosophers; he tried to set out a complete philosophic edifice from scratch, something which had not really been attempted by anyone since Aristotle. He developed a simple, direct and clear literary style, one that could be understood by intelligent men of the world; he did not try for an obscure or jargon-ridden style that would impress without really communicating.

Standard
Arts, Literature, Philosophy

The Stoic: Be Ruthless To The Things That Don’t Matter

CLARITY

“How many have laid waste to your life when you weren’t aware of what you were losing, how much was wasted in pointless grief, foolish joy, greedy desire, and social amusements – how little of your own was left to you. You will realise you are dying before your time!” – Seneca, On The Brevity of Life, 3.3b

 

ONE of the hardest things to do in life is to say “No.” To invitations, to requests, to obligations, to the things that everyone else is doing. Even harder is saying no to certain time-consuming emotions: anger, excitement, distraction, obsession, lust. None of these impulses feels like a big deal by itself, but run amok, they become a commitment like anything else.

If you’re not careful, these are precisely the impositions that will overwhelm and consume your life. Do you ever wonder how you can get some of your time back, how you can feel less busy? Start by learning the power of “No!” – as in “No, thank you,” and “No, I’m not going to get caught up in that,” and “No, I just can’t right now.” It may hurt some feelings. It may turn people off. It may take some hard work. But the more you say no to the things that don’t matter, the more you can yes to the things that do. This will let you live and enjoy your life – the life that you want.

. Previously The Stoic: Control & Choice

Standard
Arts, Literature, Philosophy

The Stoic: Control & Choice

CLARITY

“The chief task in life is simply this: to identify and separate matters so that I can say clearly to myself which are externals not under my control, and which have to do with the choices I actually control. Where then do I look for good and evil? Not to uncontrollable externals, but within myself to the choices that are my own.” – Epictetus, Discourses, 2.5.4–5

The Pen

A metonymic adage, coined by English author Edward Bulwer-Lytton in 1839.

THE single most important practice in Stoic philosophy is differentiating between what we can change and what we can’t. What we have influence over and what we do not. A flight is delayed because of weather – no amount of yelling at an airline representative will end a storm. No amount of wishing will make you taller or shorter or born in a different country. No matter how hard you try, you can’t make someone like you. And on top of that, time spent hurling yourself at those immovable objects is time not spent on the things we can change.

The recovery community practices something called the Serenity Prayer: “God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.” Addicts cannot change the abuse suffered in childhood. They cannot undo the choices they have made or the hurt they have caused. But they can change the future – through the power they have in the present moment. As Epictetus said, they can control the choices they make right now.

The same is true for us today. If we can focus on making clear what parts of our day are within our control and what parts are not, we will not only be happier, we will have a distinct advantage over other people who fail to realise they are fighting an unwinnable battle.

The Stoic is a new series on site which aims to interpret powerful quotations and historical anecdotes through personal commentary.

Appendage:

stoicism

Standard