Britain, Government, Health, Politics, Society

NHS at 70: The Health Service faces tough choices to survive

THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE

Intro: The NHS is creaking under the strain of an ageing and unfit population

The natural lifespan of a human being was once viewed as being three score years and ten. But while a baby girl born in 1948 could reasonably look forward to a life that long, the life expectancy of a boy was less than 66.

How times have changed. Today, the respective figures for either gender are about 10 years longer, thanks in large part to the National Health Service which turned 70 on the 5 July.

Among its major achievements, the NHS has saved countless lives from infection or injury, eliminated horrific diseases like polio from the UK, introduced comprehensive vaccination programmes, and enabled the birth of the world’s first IVF baby. It has many other successes to its name.

NHS staff have become the heroes of modern-day Britain: nurses were last year voted the most trusted profession, with doctors a close second. Nurse Pauline Cafferkey, who contracted Ebola while working in Sierra Leone, recently told of how she was “astounded” by the level of care she received, with medical staff “putting their lives on hold and working round the clock” to save her.

And she is certainly not alone. The Commonwealth Fund, a US think tank, last year ranked the NHS as the best healthcare system in 11 leading countries, including the US, France, Germany and Australia.

The UK’s total spending on public and private healthcare is about 10 per cent of national income. This is lower than in the US (16%), as well as Japan, France and Germany (11%). The simple comparisons would suggest we are getting a top-class health service on the cheap; indeed, the NHS has been described in the British Medical Journal as the “world’s most cost-effective healthcare system.”

Yet, for all that, the NHS is clearly showing signs of decrepitude as it moves on from its 70th anniversary. Its success at enabling the average person to live an extra decade has created a vast amount of new work to keep the diseases of old age at bay. Meanwhile, poor trends of bad diets and physical inactivity have produced a surge in rates of obesity and associated illnesses, some of which are threatening to overwhelm the NHS.

While healthcare funding has been increased by both Labour and Conservative governments, the extra cash has failed to keep pace with the rise in demand, leaving doctors and nurses increasingly overworked and stressed as waiting times for treatment have increased.

However, whilst governments and health secretaries can change, we, the public, must share some of the blame. Most people bang the table to demand appointments and yet a staggering 1.7million, about 10 per cent, of them were missed over the last decade at a cost of some £200million. Many also insist on antibiotics when they are not needed.

If we wish the NHS to continue as part of the societal fabric of the UK, then some tough choices may need to be made. And, on this, the public may be more accepting of the need for change than politicians realise.

A recent poll found 75 per cent of respondents backed fining patients who repeatedly missed appointments. Plastic surgery for purely cosmetic reasons and other non-vital procedures may need to be cut or scrapped completely.

Laws that were enacted in applying a 5p charge for plastic bags resulted in an 80-90 per cent fall in their use. So, unless we can be persuaded to stop putting so much pressure on the NHS, perhaps the time has come to consider small charges for prescriptions and even GP appointments to make us all value them more.

For if the NHS is ever lost, we will rue the day we lost sight of just how worthwhile it is.

Standard
China, Economic, European Union, Government, Politics, Society, United States

Trump’s trade war is a risk to the global economy

GLOBAL TRADE WAR

AN escalating trade war between China, the US and Europe could plunge the global economy into turmoil, international experts have warned.

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) said the battle of wills between President Donald Trump and rivals in China and the European Union has put “economic recovery in jeopardy”.

In a major report on the 20 largest economies – known as the G20 – WTO economists warn that angry rhetoric and rising tariffs on all sides are a severe threat.

The WTO said that G20 countries slapped £52.6billion of sanctions on trade between October and May. A total of 39 new restrictive measures were introduced to block goods from competitors – double the number in the previous report.

The WTO said: “The G20 economies must use all means at their disposal to de-escalate the situation and promote further trade recovery.”

President Trump vowed on the campaign trail to protect US jobs and industries from globalisation. He has imposed aluminium and steel tariffs on China and the EU, and hit the Chinese with extra duties on everything from bulldozers to touchscreens.

Beijing responded in kind, hitting key US exports such as its important soya bean trade. Meanwhile, Brussels has slapped tariffs on American goods, including motorcycles and bourbon whiskey.

The President is now threatening to act against Europe’s prized car manufacturers. Last week, he said: “The EU is possibly as bad as China, only smaller. They send a Mercedes in, we can’t send our cars in.”

Standard
Consumer Affairs, Energy, Government, Society

Smart Meters and the ‘hidden agenda’

ENERGY USAGE

Smart Meters

ENERGY firms using smart meters have a “hidden agenda” to charge customers more when demand for power surges, an expert has warned.

The technology has been promoted as a way of ending estimated bills and giving households real-time information on how much energy they are using.

But it will also allow firms to introduce a raft of new tariffs that will hit those who use electricity and gas at peak times with higher charges.

Under these “time-of-use” tariffs those who use appliances at off-peak times overnight will be rewarded with low rates. This will have the effect of spreading out demand over a 24-hour period. This is seen as an advantage by the Government and energy industry because it means fewer power stations are needed to cover the daily peak.

. See also Concern over energy firms refusing to pass on price cuts…

But the move towards these tariffs raises the prospect of surge pricing during holiday periods when millions of householders are using appliances at the same time.

The former head of gas and electricity meter technology at the energy regulator OFGEM, Jerry Fulton, said the industry will quickly move beyond a two-tier peak and off-peak system to prices that change depending on demand every 30 minutes. He said: “I believe that the hidden agenda behind smart meters is that they will allow half-hourly charging.

“Instead of having two charge rates – day and night – the price of energy will change every half hour, so when solar and wind generation are low and usage is high the price of electricity will rise steeply.”

Unlike ordinary meters, smart devices transmit information about when households use most energy to suppliers.

The default setting on most means that the machines send a total usage figure to suppliers once a month. Customers can change this to send their data as often as every half an hour.

These regular updates are essential for those who have signed up to a tariff where prices vary depending on the time of day. This type of tariff was first offered by British Gas two years ago.

It ran trials giving smart meter customers free electricity for eight hours on either a Saturday or Sunday in an attempt to encourage them to shift heavy power use to this off-peak period.

Another smaller provider, Green Energy UK, has already launched a “time-of-day” tariff where prices vary between periods of high and low demand. It charges five times more for electricity used in early evening than it does overnight.

More of these types of tariffs are expected to flood the market as the rollout of smart meters continues. They are not yet compulsory, but suppliers must at least offer every household a smart meter by 2020.

Critics say everyone cooking family meals, watching prime-time TV shows and heating their homes in the evenings will be penalised by time-of-day tariffs. Higher charges are also likely to apply in the mornings when people are taking showers and heating their homes as they get ready for the day ahead.

A spokesperson for the comparison site Energy helpline, said: “Energy prices are confusing enough and fluctuating half-hourly tariffs will complicate matters further. How are you supposed to know when to turn the dishwasher on when the cost is continually changing?

“For years the Government has been saying it wants to simplify the energy market for customers. This will do the exact opposite.”

Standard