Arts, Books, Literature

Book Review – Eileen: The Making of George Orwell

LITERARY REVIEW

Eileen

BACK in 1934, a poem was published in the Sunderland Church High School magazine. It had been written by one of its alumnae, Eileen Maud O’Shaugnessy entitled, End Of The Century, 1984.

The poem foresaw a bleak near-future in which academic scholars, with no need for books, “know just what they ought”, and which led to a situation described as “mental cremation”.

A year after writing that poem, pretty dark-haired Eileen would meet George Orwell at a smoky party in a flat in London’s Hampstead. He fixed his piercing blue eyes on her and they talked all evening. “Now, that’s just the kind of girl I would like to marry,” Orwell said afterwards to the party’s host – and he proposed within weeks. He was so hard up that he could afford only a cheap ring from Woolworths.

That “1984” poem was rediscovered only in 2001. It’s surely not fanciful to suggest, as the author of this fascinating biography of Orwell’s first wife writes, that Eileen’s poem planted the seeds of the Nineteen Eighty-Four dystopia in Orwell’s mind: a world where the thoughts of a brainwashed society are prescribed by Big Brother.

The Canadian author Sylvia Topp has brilliantly recaptured the flavour and texture of the Orwell’s marriage.

One that is vividly bound up that the reader of this book might feel as if they themselves had been living in a damp, cold, mouse-infested cottage with a corrugated iron roof, regularly milking the goats and living on eggs from the stock of 26 hens. Eileen spent hours typing up her husband’s manuscripts, while he repeatedly coughed all over her, a perpetual drip on the end of his nose, his infected TB breath imbuing the place with a sickly-sweet odour.

 

THEIR tragically brief nine years of marriage took place before Orwell became famous. He was a little-known, struggling author. In a drive to shrug off his well-healed Eton years of public schooling, the couple embarked on a Thirties Good Life, a Tom-and-Barbara type of existence, which aimed to prove it was possible to subsist on their own produce.

They kept a goat, named Muriel after one of Orwell’s aunts (there would later be a goat in Animal Farm also called Muriel). Every morning Orwell rose at 6.30am to milk Muriel and to record precisely how many eggs each hen had laid. Utterly shabby in the daytime, the Old Etonian in Orwell came out at night: he changed into black tie every evening, and tucked into Eileen’s apple meringue pie.

It was Eileen, not her husband, who was the university graduate. Orwell had left Eton to be a policeman in Burma where, with servants to do everything for him, he’d picked up slovenly habits, such as dropping his cigarette ends onto the floor. Eileen had a degree from St Hugh’s College, Oxford, and was studying for an MA in psychology in London when she met Orwell. She gave up her studies and devoted her life to be his helpmeet and typist.

Neither of them was healthy. In fact, there’s so much illness in this book that you may well feel that the very pages you’re reading are contagious. Orwell kept having to spend months in sanitoriums because he was coughing up blood. This made life even more exhausting for Eileen, who had to visit him (starting with a three-mile walk just to get to the railway station), as well as typing up his manuscripts, and tending to the animals and plants on her own.

She was so tied up doing all this, and he was so busy writing and being ill, that neither noticed that Eileen, working herself to the bone, was ailing faster.

A few months into their marriage, in 1936, Orwell vanished to Spain to fight for the Republican army. Eileen followed him there shortly afterwards; she managed to get Orwell’s Aunt Nellie to live at the cottage and milk Muriel in their absence.

Eileen got a job as a secretary to the Independent Labour Party representative in Barcelona, which she greatly enjoyed. It’s thought that, while in Spain, she had a brief affair with Georges Kopp, Orwell’s commander. Her husband, meanwhile, was shot in the shoulder by Fascists, and said to the American beside him: “I’m done for. Please tell Eileen I love her.”

Thanks to Eileen’s swift organisation and care, the couple managed to escape by train, just before the war turned really nasty. Back they went to their mouse-infested cottage, the unkempt garden gone to seed, Aunt Nellie totally out of her depth.

How was Orwell and Eileen’s relationship, really? Infuriatingly for posterity, they threw almost all their letters to each other away – which suggests a marked lack of romance.

Eileen had that brief affair in Spain, and Orwell, returning to Britain, started pursuing Eileen’s best friend, Lydia Jackson, to whom he wrote: “I would regard it as a privilege to see you naked”. Lydia succumbed, writing later that Orwell’s kissing was “good and clean”, but his hands were “coarse and clumsy”.

So the Orwells’ marriage was a bit of an open one. The great sadness was that the couple couldn’t conceive a child. This may have been caused by Eileen’s mild attack of Spanish flu in the pandemic of 1918. Orwell refused to submit to a medical examination, thinking it “too disgusting”.

 

YET there’s a real sense that these were two kindred spirits who found one another’s company perpetually stimulating. Topp’s subtitle for her book is The Making of George Orwell, and she argues that it was thanks to Eileen that Orwell’s prose took on a fresh zip and wit. Many critics noted a new zestfulness in his writing after they met, though no one credited her.

Orwell admired Eileen’s highly educated mind. They sparked off each other, keeping up a “merry war” of words. She would pronounce on his generalisations, such as “all tobacconists are fascists”, and would not let him get away with them.

Typically cussedly, the couple returned to London during the Blitz, renting a succession of cabbage-smelling London flats. Both got wartime jobs: Eileen with the Ministry of Food, and Orwell as talks assistant for the BBC Foreign Service. All too imaginable.

Wonderfully, in May 1944, the couple adopted a baby, Richard. But you can feel tragedy approaching. Eileen, increasingly weak, took their son to stay with her widowed sister-in-law, while Orwell went off to Paris as a war correspondent.

One of the very few letters to survive is the last one Eileen sent to her husband in 1945, asking for his signed permission to pay for an operation for a hysterectomy to remove a growth, saying: “I really don’t think I’m worth the money.”

You can see her handwriting trailing off as the morphine takes hold. She died of cardiac failure under anaesthetic, aged 39. Orwell would live for only another five years, dying just a few months after marrying his second wife, Sonia, on his deathbed. Even he didn’t live to see his own astonishing success.

– Eileen: The Making Of George Orwell by Sylvia Topp is published by Unbound, 560pp

Standard
Arts, Books, Britain, Literature

Book Review: Padre, Prisoner and Pen-Pusher

Howson

Intro: The World War One Experiences of the Reverend Benjamin O’Rorke

THERE are few army chaplains that had as varied a career during the First World War as the Reverend Benjamin O’Rorke. A regular Padre who had seen service in the Boer War he was mobilised along with 54 other chaplains at the start of hostilities. He was deployed to France with 4 Field Ambulance where he was taken prisoner by the Germans at the end of August 1914. He was repatriated in July 1915 and wrote a book of his experiences. Returning to France he served as frontline chaplain before being posted to serve as a staff chaplain to the Deputy Chaplain General.

Posted back to the UK in June 1918 he died on 25th December 1918 during the flu epidemic. The central part of the book is a transcription of the diary he kept during January to June 1918.

At the heart of the chaplaincy administration on the Western Front he recorded an inside view of how chaplains were thinking, particularly about post-war British society. His notes include record of sermons preached throughout the war which give a fascinating record of one chaplain’s perspective on the developing war. The book puts the experiences of Ben O’Rorke within the context of chaplaincy during the First World War.

This book will appeal to all who are interested in how a regular army chaplain coped with mobilisation, life as a prisoner of war, and then of the ever-lengthening war. It provides information on the large number of chaplains with whom he came into contact whilst keeping the diary. As well as an introduction and notes to explain the diary and other writings there is a discussion about the value of chaplains’ diaries and letters in understanding the First World War.

Padre, Prisoner and Pen-pusher is published by Helion & Company (2015), 164pp

Standard
Arts, Books, Literature, Poetry

Book Review: A Little History of Poetry

LITERARY REVIEW

PICK up this book by John Carey, take a deep breath and hold on tight. The author takes us on a helter-skelter journey spanning some 4,000 years of an art form central to human life since people banged drums and thrilled each other with stories in rhyme and rhythm around a fire.

In a relatively small space, a book of 80,000 words in Yale’s useful Little History series, he skips around the world in a dance to the music of words, quickening to a dizzying whirl at the end. In summary, this is a whistle-stop tour. The inevitable superficiality of Carey’s masterly history of poetry is the book’s inherent weakness.

Its strength, however, is the knowledge of a distinguished professor sharing his passionate belief that great literature is for everybody, if only they would give it a try.

Most books of this sort begin with a long introduction setting out the reasons for the project and a general explanation of the author’s choices and method. Some readers of this book may have liked that, yet still admiring the way that Carey plunges in.

The opening of chapter one is almost brusque: “What is poetry? Poetry relates to language as music relates to noise. It is language made special, so that it will be remembered and valued . . . Over the centuries, countless thousands of poems have been forgotten. This is a book about some that have not.”

From there we start the tour – with the earliest surviving work of great literature, the Epic Of Gilgamesh, dating back to about 2,100 BC. This story of male tyranny, friendship, heroism and grief survived on 12 clay tablets marked with wedge-shaped carvings made with reeds. Think about that for a few seconds . . . miraculous.

Equally awe-inspiring is that the epic’s themes are as relevant today as ever. After all, love and death are staples of all our lives.

When at the end the great ruler Gilgamesh is humbled, “having learned that, though he is mighty and famous, he will be equal in death with all other human beings”, we know that this lesson awaits the richest and most powerful of our own time, wherever they strut.

The next 39 chapters introduce us to roughly 185 names, as well as that talented scribe known as Anonymous. Rather surprisingly, the whole book ends with the recent dead American Mary Oliver and Australian Les Murray.

Sometimes Carey’s ambitious, thematic chapter-groupings include the unexpected too. For example, in the chapter rather oddly called Poets Of The Seen World And The Unseen (which surely includes all poets?) he sums up the work of the anonymous medieval Gawain poet and William Langland – and also plonks down beside them their contemporary Persian poet Hafez, still a favourite in Iran.

It’s so brief as to be almost pointless. Yet if somebody reads some Hafez as a result, that might just be the perfect tonic for encouraging further poetic engagement.

Why read poetry? Even those who don’t have poems at their fingertips still have a primitive need in their hearts for its incantations.

Why? John Carey sums it up in the conclusion of his wise polemic, What Good Are The Arts?

“Literature does not make you a better person, though it may help you to criticise what you are. But it enlarges your mind, and it gives you thoughts, words and rhythms that will last you for life.” Absolutely!

The cover of this exhilarating book features portrait linocuts (by Nick Morley – which enliven the whole text) showing William Shakespeare with a bird perched on his finger, and Maya Angelou with a bird in a cage, invoking the title of her famous autobiography I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings.

It’s a nicely judged link between the canonical white English male and the modern American black woman, linked by centuries of poetry that make the human spirit soar up there in the rain or the blue – just like a bird.

– A Little History of Poetry by John Carey is published by Yale, 320pp

Standard