
Author Archives: markdowe1
The Life of Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh
1921–2021
PRINCE Phillip, whose name has been synonymous with royal duty and public service since his marriage to the Queen 74 years ago, has been such a constant and colourful feature of British life, it’s almost impossible to believe he’s no longer with us.
Loved and admired in equal measure, his sad passing, nine weeks before his 100th birthday, marks the end of a cherished chapter in our national story. He was of the Greatest Generation, and he will be written into the history books as one of the best.
Doughty and irrepressible to the very end, the Duke of Edinburgh was said to have died peacefully at Windsor Castle on, fittingly, what was a beautiful spring morning.
In a moving statement on his passing, Buckingham Palace expressed “deep sorrow” – a sentiment echoing the profound sense of loss felt across Britain, the Commonwealth, and many other countries.
Prince Phillip was a distinguished and decorated war veteran. He unselfishly eschewed personal ambition – he was tipped for the Royal Navy’s top job – for royal duty.
In public, he has walked a discreet step behind throughout the 69 years of Her Majesty’s reign, content to play the supporting role which the Queen came to depend on. In private, though, this was unquestionably a partnership of equals.
He has been her confidant, adviser, comforter, morale-booster and, above all, as the Sovereign put it, her “strength and stay”.
His job “first, second and last”, he would say, was “never to let her down”. That Her Majesty has reigned so successfully, calmly and without blemish for such a remarkable span of time is proof he never did.
It would be wholly wrong and recklessly incomplete to characterise and pigeonhole Phillip as merely the longest-serving royal consort in British history. His life deserves far more accreditation than a monarchical footnote.
He was a brilliant man in his own right, possessing many gifts and talents. He could fly a jet as well as command a ship, was a talented sportsman, a skilled artist and painter, and had an excellent grasp of science.
Like so many of his generation, the duke didn’t suffer fools gladly and had little truck with political correctness. His plain speaking could be curt and would often cause controversy.
Beyond his brusque exterior, however, he was a deep thinker and an innovator. Possessing a core of steel and courage in spades, he embodied resilience and fortitude. As a young naval officer, he was praised for his actions in the decisive sea battle against the Italian fleet.
These self-same values not only helped Britain navigate the hardship of the Second World War – they spurred, to a very striking degree, our subsequent economic and social renaissance.
Yes, a man who lived a life of incredible privilege, but his personal legacy to the nation is impossible to exaggerate.
One of the last connections to an era which included the Victorians, he – like a sculptor with clay – helped mould the monarchy to modernity, shoring it up during times of turbulence.
Without Phillip’s and the Queen’s steady hand, the shape of Britain today might be inexpressibly different – and not for the better. This 1,000-year-old institution, as Prime Minister Boris Johnson says, “remains indisputably vital to the balance and happiness of our national life”.
Not content to be a mere appendage or footnote after his wife came to the throne, the duke carved a niche from which he could help transform our planet and change the lives of individuals.
He paved the way for environmental groups such as Greenpeace, played a central role in the creation of the World Wildlife Fund, and the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme remains a torch of achievement for younger people in many countries.
His stewardship of the National Playing Fields Association has given millions of children somewhere to play organised sport. As a patron to nearly 800 organisations, his sense of obligation has been unmatched.
Quite apart from his royal role, which he stepped back from only four years ago at the age of 96, this was a man of vision and substance.
Despite his advancing years, the duke remained a totemic member of the Royal Family. Not just a national treasure, but also a towering father figure to the country. How else to explain the tsunami of affection and sadness following his passing? The floral tributes laid in his memory have come from members of all generations.
As an invaluable asset to the monarchy, there will be a sadness that he didn’t reach his centenary – although the duke would doubtlessly have been nonplussed by such fuss. But his shadow will cast a positive influence lasting well beyond his years.
Prince Phillip embodied self-sacrifice, family values and devotion to duty. He stands as a font of inspiration. Not just to younger royals, but the whole nation and millions worldwide.
A salute to his extraordinary life.
Book Review – Science: ‘How To Read Numbers’
REVIEW
Intro: Why numbers don’t always add up
DOES swearing when you lift something heavy make it easier? According to one scientific study, shouting obscenities will help you shift that heavy and cumbersome wardrobe across your bedroom.
It seems halfway plausible until you look at the micro numbers in the study. One experiment had 52 participants, the other 29. Perhaps swearing and using uncouth language does make you stronger, but it seems [expletive deleted] unlikely.
In this fascinating and easy to read narrative of how to interpret numbers in the news, cousins Tom and David Chivers reveal that it’s best to be wary of large claims based on small samples. Who can forget the claim and advocacy by Donald Trump of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for Covid-19? It all stemmed from a trial on just 42 patients.
Smallness of sample is not the only problem. So too is an unrepresentative one. You’d get a very skewed and biased view of average human height if you took your measurements at a basketball players’ convention.
And very different answers to the question of which was the greatest English football club in Manchester and in Liverpool.
The authors cite a classic story from the 1936 American elections. The Democrat F D Roosevelt won, taking 62 per cent of the vote, but one poll had confidently predicted victory for his Republican opponent by 57 to 43 per cent. They’d canvassed two million voters, but they’d contacted them by telephone. Phones at the time were owned mainly by the affluent who were more likely to vote Republican.
It’s also easy to make links between statistics where none exist. Sales of ice cream rise on the same days that drownings do. The explanation, obviously, is not that there is a causal link between the two.
Ice cream is nice on a hot summer day and so, too, is swimming which, unfortunately, leads to more drownings.
When we see a claim that X is linked to Y, we shouldn’t assume one causes the other. There could be some hidden thing, Z, which causes both.
When confronted by a number in a news story, it’s often difficult to assess its significance. Is that a big number? In London, over a 25-year period, 361 cyclists were killed. That seems a lot until you learn that, in the same quarter century, the average number of daily journeys by bicycle was 437,000. There was one in a ten million chance of a fatal accident per journey.
It’s also tricky to judge whether percentage increases are significant without knowing base numbers. To say that a political party doubled in size in a week would sound impressive, but not so much if it had one original member and he’d just recruited one more.
We are bombarded daily with statistics and the barrage has only increased during this year of Covid. “It’s wise to be wary”, point out the Chivers. Their enlightening book provides us with the tools to quickly identify when we’re being led astray.
– How To Read Numbers, by Tom and David Chivers, is published by W&N, 208pp