Arts, Britain, Films, History, Second World War

Film Review: Dunkirk

LITERARY REVIEW

THERE haven’t been many good films about the mass evacuation of Allied troops from the beaches of Dunkirk in the early summer of 1940. Strangely, however, two of the most notable were made in the same year, with World War II still raging. William Wyler’s Oscars-festooned Mrs Miniver, and David Lean’s In Which We Serve, both came out in 1942.

In 1958, the film Dunkirk directed by Barry Norman’s father Leslie, made a pretty decent fist of showing why Churchill called the events of May 26 to June 4, 1940, “a colossal military disaster”.

That is perhaps why not too many movies have been made about it. By contrast, D-Day and its aftermath, received oodles of cinematic attention. That event was just four months after the events at Dunkirk. But that was based on an advance; Dunkirk was merely about the definitive retreat.

Writer-director Christopher Nolan receives plaudits from many for tackling it again now, so unambiguously many of the protagonists say. Despite some of the gaps that historians will exploit, such as the absence from the film of some 15,000 Scottish soldiers of the Highland Regiments nearby, or even that of the assistance provided by India and its soldiers, this gripping and unconventional film is a mighty accomplishment all the same. It will be interesting to see whether the film will collect as many Academy Awards as Wyler’s Mrs Miniver (six).

Contrary to some over-excited reports, its main achievement is not to offer proof that the One Direction boyband star Harry Styles, who makes his screen debut can really act. Rather, it is to show, in much more vivid detail than Norman’s 1958 film, why a French place-name that is synonymous with British stoicism more accurately reflects Churchill’s infamous and grave assessment. Read enough reports, for example, of townsfolk battling against rising floodwaters, and it won’t be too long before you come across the evocative phrase “Dunkirk spirit”.

The new Prime Minister’s famous bulldog exhortation to fight on the beaches, in the fields and in the streets, was delivered in response to Dunkirk. But the same speech included the declaration that “wars are not won by evacuations”.

EMOTIVE

NOLAN uses that line as his mantra. From the film’s first frame to its last, there is never any doubt that we are witnessing a catastrophe. After all, some 338,000 members of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) returned home, but around 68,000 were lost.

The film begins, quite dramatically, with a young soldier, Tommy (Fionn Whitehead), running from German gunfire through the streets of the small French seaside town.

His arrival on the beach yields a breathtaking sight, for him and us alike. Tens of thousands of men are lined up, almost as far as the eye can see, waiting to climb into boats that have yet to arrive. And there are German bombers overhead.

Tommy hooks up with a French soldier and together they carry a wounded man on a stretcher towards the sea, not so much to save his skin as theirs. Indeed, one of the reasons this film is so moving is not so much its frequent displays of doughty heroism (not least from Mark Rylance as Mr Dawson, one of the many civilian skippers who took their boats to help with the evacuation), but more its powerful depiction of an intense will to live, against seemingly insuperable odds.

Survival instincts can sometimes look like the very opposite of bravery. Cillian Murphy plays a shellshocked soldier, saved from the sea by Mr Dawson, who cannot bear to return to Dunkirk. However, we are encouraged not to judge him, even when he does something with terrible consequences.

The film has emotive scenes. One is where an elderly blind man, back in Blighty, welcomes home the bedraggled returning soldiers by telling them “well done”. But all they did, one of them responds, was survive. “That’s enough,” says the old man.

Another is when Kenneth Branagh’s naval commander first spots salvation in the form of all those fishing-boats and pleasure crafts helping in the rescue effort. Yet, the film does not feel manipulative. Nolan could have made more of his opening shot of the rescuing flotilla. It could have been breathtaking; thousands of boats bobbing all the way to the horizon. But he keeps it real, with a suitably motley, but relatively small, advance fleet.

With astute screenwriting, Nolan offers us a series of small, personal dramas rather than any overall narrative thread, which we must suppose is precisely what war is.

There are no scenes with Churchill and his top brass back in Whitehall trying to orchestrate Operation Dynamo, the somewhat grandiose seat-of-the-pants exercise. Instead, Nolan is far more intent on evoking the frantic chaos of that momentous week.

There is a strong sense, too, which even the best war films sometimes fail to convey, of nobody quite knowing what’s going to happen next. The director communicates this by keeping dialogue to a minimum, daringly considering his heavyweight cast. Hoyte van Hoytema’s rousing cinematography tells the story just as eloquently and powerful as any words. At times, though, there is an almost documentary realism to proceedings, which won’t please everyone. Not all viewers will be spellbound.

The film is presented from three perspectives – from land, sea and air – each within a different time frame. The fate of Tommy and a few other desperate soldiers unfolds over a week. Another is played, splendidly, by Styles, who reportedly auditioned without Nolan having the slightest idea who he was, but whose presence should tempt youngsters to watch this film. Let’s hope so. They’ll perhaps realise that ‘one direction’ has a much more solemn meaning when applied to Dunkirk.

Dunkirk (12A)

Verdict: Unmissable epic ★★★★★

Standard
Britain, Government, Politics

A new legal crackdown on those who abuse MPs

BRITAIN

The Committee on Standards in Public Life has been asked by the Prime Minister to review the law following the abuse and threats Members of Parliament have been subject to. Lord Bew will head the review.

The law could be changed to stop the diatribe and abuse of MPs, the new head of the public standards watchdog has said.

Lord Bew warned politics was at a “tipping point” after an increase in vociferous personal attacks and threats against candidates during this year’s election campaign. Some had swastikas carved on their posters.

Theresa May said she was “shocked” and has asked the Committee on Standards in Public Life to review the issue.

Lord Bew warned: “We are in a bad moment and we have to respond to it. We cannot afford to lose people of quality in our political life, and we may be approaching a tipping point.”

Speaking earlier in the week in an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour, he did not rule out the possibility that the Committee would recommend new laws to protect candidates, saying: “Everything has to be considered.”

Asked about claims by Conservative MPs that they had been abused by Left-wing activists, and that Labour had not done enough to condemn this, Lord Bew said: “It’s absolutely clear the Labour leadership holds the view that politics should be conducted in the normal way without threat or fear.”

His aim, he told the programme, was to ensure public debate remained “vigorous” but steered clear of “nastiness and hatred”.

But he called on all party leaders to speak “with some sharpness” against abuse.

Standard
Arts, Books, Britain, History

Book Review – ‘Collecting The World: The Life And Curiosity of Hans Sloane’

HANS SLOANE’S CURIOUS LIFE

Collecting The World

Collecting The World is published by Allen Lane for £25.

Intro: Hans Sloane was a medical doctor to royalty and collector supreme who created Britain’s first public museums. But he couldn’t have cared less that his treasures were tainted by the blood of slaves.

‘Admission Free’ . . . When you next read those words at the entrance to one of our national museums, thank Hans Sloane (1660 – 1753), whose collection, built up over his lifetime, formed the core of the British Museum.

In those days of endemic British snobbery, when collections of antiquities and curiosities were normally viewed only by gentleman scholars by appointment in private houses, Sloane’s concept of creating a museum to all was ground-breaking.

In his Last Will of Testament he stipulated: ‘I do hereby declare that it is my desire and intention that my said musaeum (sic) … be visited and seen by all persons desirous of seeing and viewing the same.’

This led to the passing of the British Museum Act in 1753, which stated that Sloane’s collection was ‘not only for the inspection and entertainment of the learned and curious, but for the general use and benefit of the publick (sic)’.

Some trustees were not happy with this arrangement, worrying that the dirty common people would wreck the furniture and gardens ‘and put the whole economy of the museum into disorder’.

Hans Sloane

Hans Sloane, Museum pioneer. Picture: National Portrait Gallery

THIS BOOK tells the story of Hans Sloane’s life. Having read it, I’m sure I will never look at my old Sloane Ranger Handbook again without thinking of the original Mr Sloane – or Sir Hans, as he became. A visit to Sloane Square, too, might take on a different perspective than one would otherwise have had.

Whether the blue-blooded Sloane Rangers would quite approve of him, given that he was a bit of an arriviste, is an open question.

Born the child of servants to aristocracy in Ulster, he came to London aged 19 and made it his business to climb the social ladder, achieving the first rung by learning medicine and becoming the personal physician to the Duke of Albemarie, whom he accompanied to Jamaica in 1687 to visit the Duke’s slave plantations.

When reading any book about the wealthy British in the 17th and 18th centuries, it’s never long before one’s nose is rubbed in the dark story of what helped make everyone so rich. Here, though, we get a first-hand glimpse into how the slavery system worked, and what life was like for slaves in Jamaica.

As soon as the Duke and Sloane disembarked, the Duke acquired 69 slaves, which was totally normal for a Thursday afternoon.

In the last quarter of the 17th century, the British transported 77,000 Africans to Jamaica; the crossings took three months and the mortality rate was 30 per cent.

What is striking is that Sloane, a Protestant who believed all nature was created by a benign God, had absolutely no interest in slaves as human beings.

Utterly dispassionately he describes the punishments meted out to them: ‘After they are whip’t (sic) till they are raw, some put on their skins pepper and salt to make them smart . . . they put iron rings of great weight on their ankles . . . these punishments are sometimes merited by the blacks, who are a very perverse generation of people’.

He did take an interest in slaves’ physiognomies, but this was purely commercial, gauging the degree to which different Africans made good slaves.

Sloane’s life as an obsessive collector of curiosities began in Jamaica. He started accumulating specimens of the plants and animals on the island with the help of slaves, who knew their way around and were useful for climbing trees.

Purely in passing, he gives glimpses of how the slaves lived, describing ‘the stench of a ship in from Guinea loaded with blacks to sell’.

He visited the slaves’ enclosures where they were allowed to grow a few crops to supplement the rotting carcasses they were fed by their owners. Some had managed to conceal a grain or two of rice in their hair before being hounded on to ships in Africa, and these were planted to sustain their families.

Sloane collected samples from these grounds that remain immaculately preserved in the Sloane Herbarium (now at the Natural History Museum). He also obtained an example of African music, taken down at his request by one of the ‘negroes’ – it’s the earliest sample of African music in the Americas. Proudly, Sloane noted: ‘I desired Mr Baptiste, the best Musician, to take the words they sung and set them to Musick (sic).’

For the modern reader, to look at the illustration of that snatch of music is to witness a fleeting glimpse of the deep yearnings of slaves for their homeland. For Sloane, it was an amazing souvenir.

The Duke died of drink and his corpse was embalmed and brought back to England – but not before Sloane had met Elizabeth Rose, the daughter of a wealthy planter, whom he would marry, bringing him a one-third share of the net profits from her father’s vast plantations.

Back in London, he built up his reputation as a great physician, living in fashionable Bloomsbury where his patients included Samuel Pepys, Robert Walpole, Queen Anne and two King Georges.

‘I’m almost wishing myself sick, that I might have a pretence to invite you for an hour or two,’ Pepys wrote to him – Sloane was clearly good company.

He became President of the Royal College of Physicians and aimed to bring medicine away from magic and quackery and into the new world of science.

He inoculated Queen Caroline’s children against small pox, but not before trying out the inoculation on prisoners in Newgate and then on charity children – just in case.

But it was a collector of objects from all over the world that Sloane became famous. He moved to Chelsea Manor and bought the house next door, which he filled with his burgeoning collection of natural specimens and man-made curiosities: he was at the helm of a new mania for treasure-hunting.

 

SOME people (including William Hogarth) mocked him for being a shallow collector of nonsense, ‘a mere trafficker of baubles’. But there was no stopping him.

Raking in money from Jamaica (on a single day in 1723 his books record proceeds from sugar shipments of more than £20,000 in today’s money), and with a genius for making contact with travellers to China, Japan and the South Seas, he could never resist a new offering, and seemed to collect everything.

His treasures ranged from ‘a long worm drawn piece meal from a Guinea negro’s legs and other muscular parts’ to drums, shoes, scientific instruments, thousands of medals, coins, birds’ eggs, fossils, sea urchins, human skeletons and an Egyptian mummy.

He collected other collectors’ collections in a way the author describes as ‘cannibalistic’. Visitors marvelled at ‘God’s power to create and Sloane’s power to collect.’

He was canny enough to choreograph his own legacy, appointing 63 trustees to ensure the creation of the ‘musaeum’ in which his collections would be preserved.

From the day of its opening in what was Montagu House, before the new Parthenon-like structure replaced it in the 1850s, the British Museum was a showroom for celebrating the global reach of British power.

This book succeeds in paying tribute to the man who was a living embodiment of that global reach, but it never shirks from exposing the dark side of his story: his unashamed acceptance of slavery as the engine of his wealth.

–     Collecting The World: The Life And Curiosity of Hans Sloane by James Delbourgo is published by Allen Lane for £25.

Standard